Comparative efficacy and safety of targeted narrowband ultraviolet B, 308-nm excimer laser, and 308-nm excimer lamp in vitiligo: a retrospective study.

Thamonwan Tantivithiwate, Chayada Chaiyabutr, Chanisada Wongpraparut, Punyanut Yothachai, Nuttaporn Nuntawisuttiwong, Narumol Silpa-Archa
{"title":"Comparative efficacy and safety of targeted narrowband ultraviolet B, 308-nm excimer laser, and 308-nm excimer lamp in vitiligo: a retrospective study.","authors":"Thamonwan Tantivithiwate, Chayada Chaiyabutr, Chanisada Wongpraparut, Punyanut Yothachai, Nuttaporn Nuntawisuttiwong, Narumol Silpa-Archa","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2025.2514637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data directly comparing targeted narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB), 308-nm excimer laser, and 308-nm excimer lamp for vitiligo are limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared the efficacy and safety of these three modalities in vitiligo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of vitiligo patients at the Photodermatology Clinic, Siriraj Hospital. Patients received either targeted NB-UVB (group A), a 308-nm excimer laser (group B), or a 308-nm excimer lamp (group C), administered two to three times per week for at least 3 months. Photographs taken before and after therapy were evaluated. The primary outcome was repigmentation, graded on a five-tier scale: poor (0-25%), fair (26-50%), good (51-75%), very good (76-90%), and excellent (91-100%). The secondary outcome was treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences in efficacy were observed among the three groups, indicated by a very good to excellent response in 42.4% (group A), 17.6% (group B), and 29.4% (group C). Although group A showed higher response rates at 3 and 6 months, differences were not significant. Adverse effects were significantly more frequent in group C.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three devices demonstrated comparable efficacy and promoted rapid repigmentation. However, the excimer lamp had the highest rate of adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"36 1","pages":"2514637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2514637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data directly comparing targeted narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB), 308-nm excimer laser, and 308-nm excimer lamp for vitiligo are limited.

Objectives: We compared the efficacy and safety of these three modalities in vitiligo.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of vitiligo patients at the Photodermatology Clinic, Siriraj Hospital. Patients received either targeted NB-UVB (group A), a 308-nm excimer laser (group B), or a 308-nm excimer lamp (group C), administered two to three times per week for at least 3 months. Photographs taken before and after therapy were evaluated. The primary outcome was repigmentation, graded on a five-tier scale: poor (0-25%), fair (26-50%), good (51-75%), very good (76-90%), and excellent (91-100%). The secondary outcome was treatment-related adverse events.

Results: No statistically significant differences in efficacy were observed among the three groups, indicated by a very good to excellent response in 42.4% (group A), 17.6% (group B), and 29.4% (group C). Although group A showed higher response rates at 3 and 6 months, differences were not significant. Adverse effects were significantly more frequent in group C.

Conclusions: All three devices demonstrated comparable efficacy and promoted rapid repigmentation. However, the excimer lamp had the highest rate of adverse effects.

靶向窄带紫外B、308 nm准分子激光和308 nm准分子灯治疗白癜风的疗效和安全性比较:回顾性研究。
背景:直接比较靶向窄带紫外B (NB-UVB)、308 nm准分子激光器和308 nm准分子灯治疗白癜风的数据有限。目的:我们比较了这三种治疗白癜风的方法的疗效和安全性。方法:在回顾性研究中,我们回顾了Siriraj医院光皮肤科诊所白癜风患者的医疗记录。患者接受靶向NB-UVB (A组),308 nm准分子激光(B组)或308 nm准分子灯(C组),每周给药2至3次,持续至少3个月。对治疗前后拍摄的照片进行评估。主要结果是色素沉着,分为五个等级:差(0-25%)、一般(26-50%)、良好(51-75%)、非常好(76-90%)和优秀(91-100%)。次要终点是治疗相关不良事件。结果:三组疗效比较差异无统计学意义,a组疗效为42.4%,B组疗效为17.6%,C组疗效为29.4%。虽然A组在3个月和6个月时的有效率更高,但差异不显著。c组的不良反应明显更频繁。结论:所有三种器械都显示出相当的疗效,并促进了快速的色素沉着。而准分子灯的不良反应发生率最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信