Marco Proano, Eyerusalem Akpan, Kimberly Reiter, Vimla L Patel, Vishal Vashistha
{"title":"Physician Attitudes About Veterans Affairs Video Connect Encounters.","authors":"Marco Proano, Eyerusalem Akpan, Kimberly Reiter, Vimla L Patel, Vishal Vashistha","doi":"10.12788/fp.0538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) launched the VA Video Connect (VVC) video conferencing platform to connect veterans with VA clinicians in 2018. We assessed practices, concerns, and perceptions toward VVC encounters among physicians within the VA New Mexico Healthcare System (VANMHCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicine Service Physicians of VANMHCS who had previously completed ≥ 1 VVC encounter were invited to semistructured interviews. Questions were constructed to assess the following domains: overarching views of video telehealth, perceptions of the VVC application, and barriers to the broad implementation of video telehealth. Interviews were assessed using a qualitative, open-coding approach. Themes were constructed both deductively, through direct responses to interview questions, and inductively, by identifying emerging patterns in the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 64 physicians invited to participate, 13 (20%) were interviewed. Of those interviewed, 9 (69%) were female, 10 (77%) were specialists, 8 (62%) had been practicing for ≥ 10 years, and 7 (54%) completed ≥ 5 VVC visits. Interviews ranged from 10 to 25 minutes. Five themes were observed: (1) VVC software and internet connection issues affected implementation; (2) patient technological literacy affected both veteran and physician comfort with VVC; (3) integration of supportive measures is desired; (4) clinical video telehealth (CVT) services may increasingly enhance access to care; and (5) in-person encounters provided unique advantages over CVT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physicians believe VVC could lead to improved access to care for veterans facing geographical challenges. Efforts should focus on improving VVC user interface and addressing technological issues, educating veterans/physicians on the use of CVT, and integrating supportive measures for successful VVC encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":94009,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"41 12","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) launched the VA Video Connect (VVC) video conferencing platform to connect veterans with VA clinicians in 2018. We assessed practices, concerns, and perceptions toward VVC encounters among physicians within the VA New Mexico Healthcare System (VANMHCS).
Methods: Medicine Service Physicians of VANMHCS who had previously completed ≥ 1 VVC encounter were invited to semistructured interviews. Questions were constructed to assess the following domains: overarching views of video telehealth, perceptions of the VVC application, and barriers to the broad implementation of video telehealth. Interviews were assessed using a qualitative, open-coding approach. Themes were constructed both deductively, through direct responses to interview questions, and inductively, by identifying emerging patterns in the data.
Results: Of the 64 physicians invited to participate, 13 (20%) were interviewed. Of those interviewed, 9 (69%) were female, 10 (77%) were specialists, 8 (62%) had been practicing for ≥ 10 years, and 7 (54%) completed ≥ 5 VVC visits. Interviews ranged from 10 to 25 minutes. Five themes were observed: (1) VVC software and internet connection issues affected implementation; (2) patient technological literacy affected both veteran and physician comfort with VVC; (3) integration of supportive measures is desired; (4) clinical video telehealth (CVT) services may increasingly enhance access to care; and (5) in-person encounters provided unique advantages over CVT.
Conclusions: Physicians believe VVC could lead to improved access to care for veterans facing geographical challenges. Efforts should focus on improving VVC user interface and addressing technological issues, educating veterans/physicians on the use of CVT, and integrating supportive measures for successful VVC encounters.
背景:2018年,美国退伍军人事务部(VA)推出了VA Video Connect (VVC)视频会议平台,将退伍军人与VA临床医生联系起来。我们评估了VA新墨西哥医疗保健系统(VANMHCS)内医生对VVC遭遇的实践、关注和看法。方法:邀请已完成1次以上VVC就诊的VANMHCS内科服务医师进行半结构化访谈。问题的构建是为了评估以下领域:对视频远程医疗的总体看法、对视频远程医疗应用的看法以及广泛实施视频远程医疗的障碍。访谈采用定性的开放式编码方法进行评估。主题是通过对访谈问题的直接回答来演绎构建的,通过识别数据中的新模式来归纳构建的。结果:在64名受邀参与的医生中,13名(20%)接受了访谈。受访患者中,女性9人(69%),专科10人(77%),执业≥10年8人(62%),VVC就诊≥5次7人(54%)。采访时间从10到25分钟不等。观察到五个主题:(1)VVC软件和互联网连接问题影响了实施;(2)患者技术素养影响退伍军人和医生对VVC的舒适度;(3)配套措施一体化;(4)临床视频远程医疗(CVT)服务可能会日益增加获得护理的机会;(5)与CVT相比,面对面的接触提供了独特的优势。结论:医生认为VVC可以改善面临地理挑战的退伍军人获得护理的机会。应着重改进VVC用户界面和解决技术问题,教育退伍军人/医生使用CVT,并为成功的VVC接触整合支持措施。