Pathways to care: Factors predicting women's access to clinic versus pharmacy-based medication abortion in Ghana.

IF 2.9
Women's health (London, England) Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-17 DOI:10.1177/17455057251347032
Caesar Agula, Adriana Biney, Pearl Kyei, Ayaga A Bawah
{"title":"Pathways to care: Factors predicting women's access to clinic versus pharmacy-based medication abortion in Ghana.","authors":"Caesar Agula, Adriana Biney, Pearl Kyei, Ayaga A Bawah","doi":"10.1177/17455057251347032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women's decision to access medication abortion (MA) in clinics or pharmacies may be shaped by several factors, but is an area that has not been adequately researched. Little is also known about the primary predictors of choice of MA provider.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our study examined the factors associated with choice of MA provider and identified the primary predictors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A non-inferiority and prospective design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized data from a non-inferiority and prospective study that recruited women who had MA from selected clinics and pharmacies in Ghana. Our sample comprises 1045 and 929 women from clinics and pharmacies, respectively. We used a multivariate binary logistic model to examine the factors associated with MA providers. Following this, a decision tree model was utilized to shed light on the main predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results show that women were more likely to spend more on accessing MA in clinics than in pharmacies (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.0, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Notably, results from the decision tree model indicate that MA cost has the strongest effect on provider selection (χ<sup>2</sup> = 937, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Additionally, women over 24 years old (AOR = 0.7, <i>p</i> < 0.05), those with secondary education (AOR = 0.5, <i>p</i> < 0.01), those who learned about MA from friends or close relatives (AOR = 0.5, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and those who previously had MA before their recent MA (AOR = 0.6, <i>p</i> < 0.01) were less likely to access MA in clinics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that cost has the strongest effect on women's choice of MA provider in Ghana. In addition, sociodemographic and abortion-related factors play a role. These factors should be considered in developing strategies to enhance equal opportunity in accessing high-quality and safe MA. For instance, developing strategies to reduce MA costs in clinical settings could reduce the burden on vulnerable women, including those younger who may prefer clinic providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"21 ","pages":"17455057251347032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251347032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women's decision to access medication abortion (MA) in clinics or pharmacies may be shaped by several factors, but is an area that has not been adequately researched. Little is also known about the primary predictors of choice of MA provider.

Objectives: Our study examined the factors associated with choice of MA provider and identified the primary predictors.

Design: A non-inferiority and prospective design.

Methods: We utilized data from a non-inferiority and prospective study that recruited women who had MA from selected clinics and pharmacies in Ghana. Our sample comprises 1045 and 929 women from clinics and pharmacies, respectively. We used a multivariate binary logistic model to examine the factors associated with MA providers. Following this, a decision tree model was utilized to shed light on the main predictors.

Results: Our results show that women were more likely to spend more on accessing MA in clinics than in pharmacies (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.0, p < 0.01). Notably, results from the decision tree model indicate that MA cost has the strongest effect on provider selection (χ2 = 937, p < 0.01). Additionally, women over 24 years old (AOR = 0.7, p < 0.05), those with secondary education (AOR = 0.5, p < 0.01), those who learned about MA from friends or close relatives (AOR = 0.5, p < 0.01), and those who previously had MA before their recent MA (AOR = 0.6, p < 0.01) were less likely to access MA in clinics.

Conclusion: We found that cost has the strongest effect on women's choice of MA provider in Ghana. In addition, sociodemographic and abortion-related factors play a role. These factors should be considered in developing strategies to enhance equal opportunity in accessing high-quality and safe MA. For instance, developing strategies to reduce MA costs in clinical settings could reduce the burden on vulnerable women, including those younger who may prefer clinic providers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

途径护理:因素预测妇女获得诊所与基于药物流产在加纳。
背景:妇女在诊所或药房获得药物流产(MA)的决定可能受到几个因素的影响,但这是一个尚未充分研究的领域。对于选择医疗服务提供者的主要预测因素也知之甚少。目的:我们的研究考察了与选择医疗服务提供者相关的因素,并确定了主要的预测因素。设计:非劣效性前瞻性设计。方法:我们利用了一项非劣效性和前瞻性研究的数据,该研究从加纳选定的诊所和药店招募了患有MA的妇女。我们的样本分别包括来自诊所和药店的1045名和929名妇女。我们使用多元二元逻辑模型来检验与医疗服务提供者相关的因素。在此之后,使用决策树模型来阐明主要预测因子。结果:我们的研究结果显示,女性在诊所比在药店更有可能花费更多的钱来获得医疗服务(调整后的优势比(AOR) = 1.0, p 2 = 937, p p p p p p p)。结论:我们发现,在加纳,成本对女性选择医疗服务提供者的影响最大。此外,社会人口和堕胎相关因素也起作用。在制定战略以提高获得高质量和安全的MA的平等机会时,应考虑这些因素。例如,制定减少临床环境中MA费用的策略可以减轻弱势妇女的负担,包括那些可能更喜欢诊所提供者的年轻妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信