Naturalistic Psychedelic Use and Psychotic Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study of Individuals with a Personal or Family History of Psychotic or Bipolar Disorders.

Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2025-05-26 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1089/psymed.2024.0036
Haley Maria Dourron, Melissa Bradley, Otto Simonsson, Heith Copes, Daniel Grossman, Ryan Andrew Shallcross, Peter S Hendricks
{"title":"Naturalistic Psychedelic Use and Psychotic Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study of Individuals with a Personal or Family History of Psychotic or Bipolar Disorders.","authors":"Haley Maria Dourron, Melissa Bradley, Otto Simonsson, Heith Copes, Daniel Grossman, Ryan Andrew Shallcross, Peter S Hendricks","doi":"10.1089/psymed.2024.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior research examining the associations between psychedelic use and general psychotic symptoms has yielded mixed findings. However, no studies have investigated the relationships between psychedelic use and specific psychotic symptoms, and whether these relationships might differ among those with liability to psychosis, namely those with a history of psychotic or bipolar disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using cross-sectional survey data from a purposive sample (<i>n</i> = 548), we first regressed estimated lifetime psychedelic use occasions and personal and family history of psychotic or bipolar disorders on the Magical Ideation Scale, Referential Thinking Scale, Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms, and Continuum of Auditory Hallucinations-State Assessment, unadjusted and adjusted for a range of covariates. We then tested the interactions of estimated lifetime psychedelic use occasions with personal and family history of psychotic or bipolar disorders on these same measures, unadjusted and adjusted for the same set of covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In unadjusted models, the estimated number of lifetime psychedelic use occasions was robustly associated with less referential thinking, whereas personal and family histories of psychotic and bipolar disorders were each associated with moderately or slightly greater scores on all measures. Covariate-adjusted regression models revealed that the estimated number of lifetime psychedelic use occasions was not associated with any of the measured psychotic symptoms. A personal history of psychotic disorders was associated with moderately greater magical ideation, referential thinking, and auditory hallucinations, whereas a family history of psychotic disorders was associated with slightly greater negative symptoms. Neither personal nor family history of bipolar disorder was associated with any psychotic symptoms. Finally, estimated lifetime psychedelic use occasions interacted only with a personal history of psychotic disorders on one measure, such that auditory hallucinations were less severe as psychedelic use occasions increased among those with a personal history of psychotic disorder; there was no relationship between psychedelic use and auditory hallucinations among those without a personal history of psychotic disorder.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Naturalistic psychedelic use may not be associated with psychotic symptoms, even among those with a personal or family history of psychotic or bipolar disorders. Further work probing the risk-benefit profile for people typically excluded from clinical trials involving psychedelics is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74590,"journal":{"name":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"3 2","pages":"93-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/psymed.2024.0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior research examining the associations between psychedelic use and general psychotic symptoms has yielded mixed findings. However, no studies have investigated the relationships between psychedelic use and specific psychotic symptoms, and whether these relationships might differ among those with liability to psychosis, namely those with a history of psychotic or bipolar disorders.

Methods: Using cross-sectional survey data from a purposive sample (n = 548), we first regressed estimated lifetime psychedelic use occasions and personal and family history of psychotic or bipolar disorders on the Magical Ideation Scale, Referential Thinking Scale, Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms, and Continuum of Auditory Hallucinations-State Assessment, unadjusted and adjusted for a range of covariates. We then tested the interactions of estimated lifetime psychedelic use occasions with personal and family history of psychotic or bipolar disorders on these same measures, unadjusted and adjusted for the same set of covariates.

Results: In unadjusted models, the estimated number of lifetime psychedelic use occasions was robustly associated with less referential thinking, whereas personal and family histories of psychotic and bipolar disorders were each associated with moderately or slightly greater scores on all measures. Covariate-adjusted regression models revealed that the estimated number of lifetime psychedelic use occasions was not associated with any of the measured psychotic symptoms. A personal history of psychotic disorders was associated with moderately greater magical ideation, referential thinking, and auditory hallucinations, whereas a family history of psychotic disorders was associated with slightly greater negative symptoms. Neither personal nor family history of bipolar disorder was associated with any psychotic symptoms. Finally, estimated lifetime psychedelic use occasions interacted only with a personal history of psychotic disorders on one measure, such that auditory hallucinations were less severe as psychedelic use occasions increased among those with a personal history of psychotic disorder; there was no relationship between psychedelic use and auditory hallucinations among those without a personal history of psychotic disorder.

Conclusion: Naturalistic psychedelic use may not be associated with psychotic symptoms, even among those with a personal or family history of psychotic or bipolar disorders. Further work probing the risk-benefit profile for people typically excluded from clinical trials involving psychedelics is needed.

自然致幻剂使用和精神病症状:一项对有精神或双相障碍个人或家族史的个体的横断面研究
背景:先前的研究检查了迷幻药使用和一般精神病症状之间的关系,得出了不同的结果。然而,没有研究调查迷幻药使用与特定精神病症状之间的关系,以及这些关系是否可能在精神病易感性中有所不同,即那些有精神病或双相情感障碍病史的人。方法:使用来自有目的样本(n = 548)的横断面调查数据,我们首先回归了估计的一生迷幻药使用次数以及精神病或双相情感障碍的个人和家族史,包括魔幻思维量表、参照思维量表、阴性症状自我评估和幻听连续状态评估,未经调整和调整了一系列共变量。然后,我们测试了估计的一生迷幻药使用次数与精神病或双相情感障碍的个人和家族史之间的相互作用,在这些相同的测量中,未调整和调整了同一组协变量。结果:在未经调整的模型中,一生中使用迷幻药的估计次数与较少的参考思维密切相关,而精神病和双相情感障碍的个人和家族史在所有测量中均与中等或略高的分数相关。协变量调整回归模型显示,一生中使用迷幻药的估计次数与任何测量的精神病症状无关。精神障碍的个人病史与中度较大的魔幻观念、参照思维和幻听相关,而精神障碍的家族史与轻度较大的阴性症状相关。双相情感障碍的个人或家族病史均与任何精神症状无关。最后,在一项测量中,估计一生中迷幻药使用次数仅与个人精神障碍史相互作用,例如,在有精神障碍个人史的人中,随着迷幻药使用次数的增加,幻听的严重程度降低;在没有精神病病史的人群中,迷幻药的使用和幻听之间没有关系。结论:自然致幻剂的使用可能与精神病症状无关,即使对那些有精神病或双相情感障碍的个人或家族病史的人也是如此。需要进一步研究那些通常被排除在涉及致幻剂的临床试验之外的人的风险-收益概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信