Shayan Ebrahimian, Troy Coaston, Amulya Vadlakonda, Joseph Hadaya, Sara Sakowitz, Ali Nsair, Radoslav Zinoviev, Boback Ziaeian, Eric H Yang, Gregg C Fonarow, Olcay Aksoy, Peyman Benharash
{"title":"Outcomes of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest at Centers With and Without On-Site Coronary Angiography: A Nationwide Analysis.","authors":"Shayan Ebrahimian, Troy Coaston, Amulya Vadlakonda, Joseph Hadaya, Sara Sakowitz, Ali Nsair, Radoslav Zinoviev, Boback Ziaeian, Eric H Yang, Gregg C Fonarow, Olcay Aksoy, Peyman Benharash","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.125.042369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American Heart Association has advocated for regionalized systems of care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), emphasizing admission to specialized centers with onsite coronary angiography. However, national data evaluating outcomes of OHCA admission to such centers remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the 2021 National Inpatient Sample, we identified all direct OHCA hospitalizations across US facilities. Hospitals were categorized as angio-capable if they performed ≥1 coronary angiography in 2021 (others: angio-incapable). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Mixed-effects modeling quantified interhospital variation in mortality. Multivariable logistic regression modeling compared mortality between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 251 260 OHCA hospitalizations across 2867 centers, 92.6% occurred at angio-capable hospitals and 7.4% at angio-incapable facilities. Patients at angio-capable centers were younger, more frequently male, and had higher rates of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, and shockable rhythms. Crude mortality was higher at angio-incapable centers than at angio-capable facilities (83.0 versus 67.7%, <i>P</i><0.001). After adjustment for patient characteristics, hospital-level factors accounted for 13.5% of mortality variation. Admission to angio-incapable centers was associated with 60% greater odds of death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.42-1.80]). Marginal effects analysis demonstrated stepwise reduction in predicted mortality rate, from 87.0% (95% CI, 85.5-88.5) at rural angio-incapable centers to 67.3% (95% CI, 66.7-67.9) at urban angio-capable centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Admission to hospitals without coronary angiography is associated with higher mortality following OHCA, with the greatest risk observed in rural settings. These findings support regionalized systems of postarrest care and the role of coronary angiography-capable centers as resuscitation hubs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e042369"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.042369","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The American Heart Association has advocated for regionalized systems of care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), emphasizing admission to specialized centers with onsite coronary angiography. However, national data evaluating outcomes of OHCA admission to such centers remain limited.
Methods: Using the 2021 National Inpatient Sample, we identified all direct OHCA hospitalizations across US facilities. Hospitals were categorized as angio-capable if they performed ≥1 coronary angiography in 2021 (others: angio-incapable). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Mixed-effects modeling quantified interhospital variation in mortality. Multivariable logistic regression modeling compared mortality between groups.
Results: Of 251 260 OHCA hospitalizations across 2867 centers, 92.6% occurred at angio-capable hospitals and 7.4% at angio-incapable facilities. Patients at angio-capable centers were younger, more frequently male, and had higher rates of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, and shockable rhythms. Crude mortality was higher at angio-incapable centers than at angio-capable facilities (83.0 versus 67.7%, P<0.001). After adjustment for patient characteristics, hospital-level factors accounted for 13.5% of mortality variation. Admission to angio-incapable centers was associated with 60% greater odds of death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.42-1.80]). Marginal effects analysis demonstrated stepwise reduction in predicted mortality rate, from 87.0% (95% CI, 85.5-88.5) at rural angio-incapable centers to 67.3% (95% CI, 66.7-67.9) at urban angio-capable centers.
Conclusions: Admission to hospitals without coronary angiography is associated with higher mortality following OHCA, with the greatest risk observed in rural settings. These findings support regionalized systems of postarrest care and the role of coronary angiography-capable centers as resuscitation hubs.
背景:美国心脏协会提倡院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的区域化护理系统,强调住院到专门的中心进行现场冠状动脉造影。然而,评估OHCA进入这些中心的结果的国家数据仍然有限。方法:使用2021年全国住院患者样本,我们确定了美国设施中所有直接OHCA住院病例。如果医院在2021年进行了≥1次冠状动脉造影,则被归类为有血管造影能力(其他:无血管造影能力)。主要终点是住院死亡率。混合效应模型量化了医院间死亡率的差异。多变量logistic回归模型比较各组之间的死亡率。结果:在2867个中心的251 260例OHCA住院患者中,92.6%发生在有血管功能的医院,7.4%发生在没有血管功能的医院。血管功能中心的患者更年轻,男性更常见,st段抬高型心肌梗死、非st段抬高型心肌梗死、心源性休克和震荡性心律的发生率更高。无血管造影中心的粗死亡率高于有血管造影设施的粗死亡率(83.0 vs 67.7%)。结论:未进行冠状动脉造影的住院与OHCA后的高死亡率相关,在农村地区观察到的风险最大。这些发现支持了区域化的休息后护理系统和冠状动脉造影中心作为复苏中心的作用。
期刊介绍:
As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.