Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-low metastatic breast cancer treated with chemotherapy.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf106
Sandhya Mehta, Jackie Kwong, Clara Lam, Bruce Feinberg
{"title":"Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-low metastatic breast cancer treated with chemotherapy.","authors":"Sandhya Mehta, Jackie Kwong, Clara Lam, Bruce Feinberg","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hormonal therapy (HT) based regimen is the preferred first-line (1L) treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with human receptor epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low expression. However, HT resistance frequently emerges with many receiving subsequent chemotherapy (CT). This study aimed to examine CT treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patient characteristics and clinical data of adults receiving CT for HR+/HER2-low mBC were collected via physician-abstracted chart review from 10/1/2021 to 1/31/2022. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics with the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate time-to-event outcomes. Statistical comparisons were conducted between patients who received 1L CT vs CT after HT-based regimens (any line).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twenty three HR+/HER2-low patients were included, and CT utilization was described by line within metastatic setting: 1L = 20.2% (n = 45), 2L 26.4% (n = 59), 3L+ = 53.4% (n = 119). A higher rate of visceral metastases (86.7% vs 65.7%, P = .01) and lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (88.9% vs 70.2%, P = 0.01) were associated with 1L CT vs CT post-HT-based treatment. The median time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and real-world progression free survival (rwPFS) of CT were similar between the groups (TTD: 6.7 months vs 8.3 months for the 1L CT and CT post-HT-based regimen groups, respectively, P = .13; rwPFS: 9.3 months vs 8.8 months, P = .26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this sample of HR+/HER2-low mBC patients, most patients switched to CT after two lines of therapy with a median rwPFS shorter than 10 months. The findings highlight unmet needs for a more effective targeted therapeutic alternative to CT for HR+/HER2-low mBC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12200229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hormonal therapy (HT) based regimen is the preferred first-line (1L) treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with human receptor epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low expression. However, HT resistance frequently emerges with many receiving subsequent chemotherapy (CT). This study aimed to examine CT treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with HR+/HER2-low mBC.

Patients and methods: Patient characteristics and clinical data of adults receiving CT for HR+/HER2-low mBC were collected via physician-abstracted chart review from 10/1/2021 to 1/31/2022. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics with the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate time-to-event outcomes. Statistical comparisons were conducted between patients who received 1L CT vs CT after HT-based regimens (any line).

Results: Two hundred and twenty three HR+/HER2-low patients were included, and CT utilization was described by line within metastatic setting: 1L = 20.2% (n = 45), 2L 26.4% (n = 59), 3L+ = 53.4% (n = 119). A higher rate of visceral metastases (86.7% vs 65.7%, P = .01) and lower Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (88.9% vs 70.2%, P = 0.01) were associated with 1L CT vs CT post-HT-based treatment. The median time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and real-world progression free survival (rwPFS) of CT were similar between the groups (TTD: 6.7 months vs 8.3 months for the 1L CT and CT post-HT-based regimen groups, respectively, P = .13; rwPFS: 9.3 months vs 8.8 months, P = .26).

Conclusion: In this sample of HR+/HER2-low mBC patients, most patients switched to CT after two lines of therapy with a median rwPFS shorter than 10 months. The findings highlight unmet needs for a more effective targeted therapeutic alternative to CT for HR+/HER2-low mBC patients.

激素受体阳性/ her2低转移性乳腺癌患者接受化疗的现实世界治疗模式和结果
以激素治疗(HT)为基础的方案是激素受体阳性(HR+)转移性乳腺癌(mBC)伴人受体表皮生长因子2 (HER2)低表达的首选一线(1L)治疗。然而,许多接受后续化疗(CT)的患者经常出现HT耐药性。本研究旨在探讨HR+/ her2低mBC患者的CT治疗模式和结果。患者和方法:收集2021年10月1日至2022年1月31日接受CT检查的成人HR+/ her2低mBC的患者特征和临床资料。使用Kaplan-Meier方法对数据进行描述性统计,以估计事件发生时间。统计学比较接受1L CT与基于ht方案(任何线)的CT患者之间的差异。结果:纳入223例HR+/ her2低患者,CT利用情况根据转移情况进行描述:1L = 20.2% (n = 45), 2L = 26.4% (n = 59), 3L+ = 53.4% (n = 119)。高内脏转移率(86.7% vs 65.7%, P = 0.01)和较低的东部肿瘤合作组(ECOG)评分(88.9% vs 70.2%, P = 0.01)与1L CT和CT基于ht的治疗相关。两组间CT的中位治疗停药时间(TTD)和真实世界无进展生存期(rwPFS)相似(TTD: 1L CT组6.7个月vs 8.3个月,P = 0.13;rwPFS: 9.3个月vs 8.8个月,P = 0.26)。结论:在HR+/ her2低的mBC患者样本中,大多数患者在两线治疗后切换到CT,中位rwPFS短于10个月。研究结果强调,对于HR+/ her2低的mBC患者,需要一种比CT更有效的靶向治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信