Measuring experiences and outcomes of mental distress-related presentations to Australian emergency departments: lived experience perspectives.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Stuart D M Thomas, Jo van Twest Farmer
{"title":"Measuring experiences and outcomes of mental distress-related presentations to Australian emergency departments: lived experience perspectives.","authors":"Stuart D M Thomas, Jo van Twest Farmer","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emergency departments (EDs) represent a key contact point for people experiencing mental health-related distress. Lived experience accounts of presenting to the ED with mental health-related concerns report the ED experience as being highly stigmatizing and negative, with significantly deleterious impacts on people's wellbeing and future help-seeking behaviours being documented. However, little by way of empirical data on these experiences and outcomes are available to help inform evidence-based policy and practice change. This scoping study considered the potential utility of using patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-rated experience measures (PREMs) in the Australian ED setting for people who present to an ED with mental health-related concerns. We interviewed eight people, all of whom had reported having presented to an ED for mental health-related reasons. Interviewees considered there being potential merit to measuring patient experiences and outcomes in this setting. Areas of focus for PROMs focussed on whether the presentation led to improvements in the person's health and whether they would return to the ED for future help. Focus areas for PREMs centred around respect for dignity, human rights being upheld, and having health needs met in a timely way. A number of concerns, challenges and opportunities are outlined. These should be used to inform larger-scale qualitative research that aims to develop patient-rated experience and outcome measures specifically for mental health-related ED presentations that are centred on, and are meaningful to, lived experience views and preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12203783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergency departments (EDs) represent a key contact point for people experiencing mental health-related distress. Lived experience accounts of presenting to the ED with mental health-related concerns report the ED experience as being highly stigmatizing and negative, with significantly deleterious impacts on people's wellbeing and future help-seeking behaviours being documented. However, little by way of empirical data on these experiences and outcomes are available to help inform evidence-based policy and practice change. This scoping study considered the potential utility of using patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-rated experience measures (PREMs) in the Australian ED setting for people who present to an ED with mental health-related concerns. We interviewed eight people, all of whom had reported having presented to an ED for mental health-related reasons. Interviewees considered there being potential merit to measuring patient experiences and outcomes in this setting. Areas of focus for PROMs focussed on whether the presentation led to improvements in the person's health and whether they would return to the ED for future help. Focus areas for PREMs centred around respect for dignity, human rights being upheld, and having health needs met in a timely way. A number of concerns, challenges and opportunities are outlined. These should be used to inform larger-scale qualitative research that aims to develop patient-rated experience and outcome measures specifically for mental health-related ED presentations that are centred on, and are meaningful to, lived experience views and preferences.

衡量经验和结果的精神痛苦相关介绍澳大利亚急诊科:生活经验的观点。
急诊科(EDs)代表了一个关键的接触点的人经历精神健康相关的困扰。向急诊科提出精神健康问题的生活经历报告称,急诊科的经历是高度污名化和消极的,对人们的福祉和未来的求助行为产生了重大有害影响。然而,很少有关于这些经验和结果的经验数据可以帮助为基于证据的政策和实践变革提供信息。这项范围研究考虑了在澳大利亚急诊科使用患者评分结果测量(PROMs)和患者评分体验测量(PREMs)对有精神健康相关问题的急诊科患者的潜在效用。我们采访了8个人,他们都曾因精神健康原因到急诊室就诊。受访者认为,在这种情况下,衡量病人的经历和结果有潜在的价值。PROMs的重点领域集中在演示是否会改善患者的健康状况,以及他们将来是否会回到急诊科寻求帮助。PREMs的重点领域集中在尊重尊严、维护人权和及时满足保健需求。概述了一些关切、挑战和机遇。这些数据应该用于为更大规模的定性研究提供信息,这些研究旨在开发患者评价的经验和结果措施,特别是针对与心理健康有关的ED演示,这些演示集中于生活经验观点和偏好,并且对生活经验观点和偏好有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信