In-home Tele-assessment for Autism in Toddlers: Validity, Reliability, and Caregiver Satisfaction with the TELE-ASD-PEDS.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Devon N Gangi, Laura Corona, Liliana Wagner, Amy Weitlauf, Zachary Warren, Sally Ozonoff
{"title":"In-home Tele-assessment for Autism in Toddlers: Validity, Reliability, and Caregiver Satisfaction with the TELE-ASD-PEDS.","authors":"Devon N Gangi, Laura Corona, Liliana Wagner, Amy Weitlauf, Zachary Warren, Sally Ozonoff","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study focused on in-home use of a tele-assessment tool for autism diagnosis in young children, the TELE-ASD-PEDS (TAP). Psychometric properties, caregiver experiences, and perceptions of feasibility were examined among families likely to experience barriers to in-person evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred eighty-two children between 18 and 42 months of age were recruited because of positive screening, primary care concerns, or early intervention referral. All participants completed initial tele-assessment including the TAP. Approximately 2 weeks later, a second visit was conducted: 92 were randomized to a repeat TAP administration by telehealth and 90 were randomized to an in-person evaluation. Caregivers completed surveys regarding challenges with technology and satisfaction with telehealth assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 77% of the sample was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (n = 140). There were few diagnostic disagreements (n = 10, 6%) between initial and second evaluations, with disagreements equally distributed between second visit type. Diagnostic outcomes (autism vs no autism) agreed between telehealth and in-person evaluation for 94% of cases, kappa = 0.82. Outcomes agreed between 2 telehealth visits for 94% of cases, kappa = 0.84. Test-retest reliability of total TAP scores across 2 administrations was strong, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.85. Very few caregivers reported challenges with technology during telehealth appointments (<6%); 92% reported that there was nothing they would change about the telehealth visit. Examiners also reported high satisfaction with telehealth assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In-home use of the TAP is valid, reliable, feasible, and acceptable to caregivers. Findings support the continued use of telehealth assessment for autism in toddlers, which can reduce disparities in access to timely diagnostic services.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"46 3","pages":"e261-e268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001358","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study focused on in-home use of a tele-assessment tool for autism diagnosis in young children, the TELE-ASD-PEDS (TAP). Psychometric properties, caregiver experiences, and perceptions of feasibility were examined among families likely to experience barriers to in-person evaluation.

Methods: One hundred eighty-two children between 18 and 42 months of age were recruited because of positive screening, primary care concerns, or early intervention referral. All participants completed initial tele-assessment including the TAP. Approximately 2 weeks later, a second visit was conducted: 92 were randomized to a repeat TAP administration by telehealth and 90 were randomized to an in-person evaluation. Caregivers completed surveys regarding challenges with technology and satisfaction with telehealth assessment.

Results: Overall, 77% of the sample was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (n = 140). There were few diagnostic disagreements (n = 10, 6%) between initial and second evaluations, with disagreements equally distributed between second visit type. Diagnostic outcomes (autism vs no autism) agreed between telehealth and in-person evaluation for 94% of cases, kappa = 0.82. Outcomes agreed between 2 telehealth visits for 94% of cases, kappa = 0.84. Test-retest reliability of total TAP scores across 2 administrations was strong, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.85. Very few caregivers reported challenges with technology during telehealth appointments (<6%); 92% reported that there was nothing they would change about the telehealth visit. Examiners also reported high satisfaction with telehealth assessments.

Conclusion: In-home use of the TAP is valid, reliable, feasible, and acceptable to caregivers. Findings support the continued use of telehealth assessment for autism in toddlers, which can reduce disparities in access to timely diagnostic services.

幼儿自闭症家庭远程评估:效度、信度和照顾者满意度。
目的:本研究主要关注幼儿自闭症远程评估工具TELE-ASD-PEDS (TAP)的家庭使用情况。心理测量的性质,照顾者的经验,并认为可行性的家庭可能会遇到障碍,以亲自评估。方法:182名年龄在18至42个月之间的儿童因阳性筛查、初级保健问题或早期干预转诊而被招募。所有参与者都完成了包括TAP在内的初步远程评估。大约2周后,进行了第二次访问:92名随机分配到通过远程医疗重复给药,90名随机分配到现场评估。护理人员完成了关于技术挑战和远程医疗评估满意度的调查。结果:总体而言,77%的样本被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍(n = 140)。第一次和第二次评估之间的诊断分歧很少(n = 10.6%),第二次就诊类型之间的分歧平均分布。在94%的病例中,远程医疗和现场评估的诊断结果(自闭症与非自闭症)一致,kappa = 0.82。94%的病例在两次远程医疗访问之间的结果一致,kappa = 0.84。两组TAP总分重测信度较强,类内相关系数= 0.85。很少有护理人员报告在远程医疗预约中遇到技术挑战(结论:在家中使用TAP是有效、可靠、可行和可接受的护理人员。研究结果支持对幼儿自闭症继续使用远程保健评估,这可以减少获得及时诊断服务的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信