In Their Own Words: Qualitative Study of Parenting During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Quinn Tucker, Robert Sege, Allison Stephens, Twinkle Suthar, Eliza Loren Purdue, Charlyn Harper Browne, Dina Burstein
{"title":"In Their Own Words: Qualitative Study of Parenting During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Quinn Tucker, Robert Sege, Allison Stephens, Twinkle Suthar, Eliza Loren Purdue, Charlyn Harper Browne, Dina Burstein","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors aimed to understand the experience of parents and caregivers during COVID-19, including the challenges they faced and what helped them cope using the Strengthening Families (SF) Approach and Protective Factors Framework's five factors: parental resilience, social connections, knowledge of parenting and child development, concrete support in times of need, and social and emotional competence of children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Family Snapshot Survey was developed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on family life, including items for quantitative analysis and 2 open-ended responses. This national survey of 9000 parents recruited from an opt-in internet panel was conducted in 3 waves of 3000 in November 2020, February 2021, and July 2021 using the online YouGov platform. The 2 open-ended responses are analyzed here using qualitative thematic analysis based on the SF Approach and Protective Factors Framework for caregivers with children aged 0 to 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SF factors were used to classify 770 responses, with many responses identified as containing multiple factors, representing their interrelated nature. A lack of concrete support was the most frequent challenge, and parental resilience was the most frequent support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Access or lack of access to concrete support in times of need underscored many of the strengths and challenges, respectively. Participants described interactions between individual protective factors that allowed for safety, stability, or positive experiences. In future community policy creation, policymakers may look at how programs interact and allow families to access multiple protective factors at once, with a critical need for providing these concrete supports.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":"46 3","pages":"e292-e299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12175968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001363","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The authors aimed to understand the experience of parents and caregivers during COVID-19, including the challenges they faced and what helped them cope using the Strengthening Families (SF) Approach and Protective Factors Framework's five factors: parental resilience, social connections, knowledge of parenting and child development, concrete support in times of need, and social and emotional competence of children.

Methods: The Family Snapshot Survey was developed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on family life, including items for quantitative analysis and 2 open-ended responses. This national survey of 9000 parents recruited from an opt-in internet panel was conducted in 3 waves of 3000 in November 2020, February 2021, and July 2021 using the online YouGov platform. The 2 open-ended responses are analyzed here using qualitative thematic analysis based on the SF Approach and Protective Factors Framework for caregivers with children aged 0 to 5 years.

Results: The SF factors were used to classify 770 responses, with many responses identified as containing multiple factors, representing their interrelated nature. A lack of concrete support was the most frequent challenge, and parental resilience was the most frequent support.

Conclusion: Access or lack of access to concrete support in times of need underscored many of the strengths and challenges, respectively. Participants described interactions between individual protective factors that allowed for safety, stability, or positive experiences. In future community policy creation, policymakers may look at how programs interact and allow families to access multiple protective factors at once, with a critical need for providing these concrete supports.

用他们自己的话说:COVID-19大流行期间父母养育的定性研究。
目的:作者旨在了解父母和照顾者在2019冠状病毒病期间的经历,包括他们面临的挑战,以及如何帮助他们利用“加强家庭”方法和保护因素框架的五个因素应对挑战:父母的复原力、社会联系、育儿和儿童发展知识、需要时的具体支持以及儿童的社交和情感能力。方法:制定《家庭快照调查》,评估新冠肺炎对家庭生活的影响,包括定量分析项目和2个开放式回答。这项全国范围的调查是通过YouGov在线平台在2020年11月、2021年2月和2021年7月分三次对9000名家长进行的。本文采用基于SF方法和保护因素框架的定性专题分析,对有0至5岁儿童的照顾者的两个开放式回答进行分析。结果:利用SF因子对770个响应进行分类,发现许多响应包含多个因子,代表了它们之间的相互关联性。缺乏具体的支持是最常见的挑战,而父母的韧性是最常见的支持。结论:在需要时获得或缺乏具体支持分别凸显了许多优势和挑战。参与者描述了允许安全、稳定或积极体验的个人保护因素之间的相互作用。在未来的社区政策制定中,决策者可能会考虑项目如何相互作用,并允许家庭同时获得多种保护因素,同时迫切需要提供这些具体的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信