Cleared to land? A nationwide analysis of emergency care hospital and HEMS infrastructure in Germany.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Justus Wolff, Christian Hohenstein, Christian Karagiannidis, Julius Kerkhoff, Hans Morten Lossius, Johannes Strobel, Jakob Ule, Janosch Dahmen
{"title":"Cleared to land? A nationwide analysis of emergency care hospital and HEMS infrastructure in Germany.","authors":"Justus Wolff, Christian Hohenstein, Christian Karagiannidis, Julius Kerkhoff, Hans Morten Lossius, Johannes Strobel, Jakob Ule, Janosch Dahmen","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01418-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare systems are increasingly shifting toward specialization and centralization. As a result, distances are growing between emergency patients and suitable emergency hospitals, as well as in between hospitals for interhospital transfers. Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) are essential in maintaining equitable access to emergency care, particularly in rural regions. However, the availability and quality of HEMS landing infrastructure at hospitals remains largely unexamined. This study provides the first nationwide integrated mapping and analysis of emergency care hospital and HEMS landing facility distribution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional analysis of all German hospitals classified under the Emergency Care Level system (ECL I-III). Using data from hospital quality reports, government registries, and satellite imagery, we assessed the availability and type of HEMS landing facilities, categorized as certified helipads or Public Interest Sites (PIS). The study aimed to map and characterize the emergency care hospital and HEMS infrastructure, identify associated hospital and regional factors, and assess spatial access and data completeness through targeted analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,037 emergency care hospitals, 69.6% have a designated landing facility, with 44.0% of these featuring a certified helipad and 56.0% relying on PIS. A substantial proportion of hospitals (30.4%) lack any HEMS landing facility, especially in urban areas. Certified helipads are more prevalent at higher-tier emergency hospitals (ECL II and III) but no landing facility is available at 18.3% of these facilities, particularly in metropolitan regions. Hospitals in rural areas are more likely to have a HEMS landing facility.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the crucial role of HEMS in emergency medical care, nearly one-third of Germany's emergency care hospitals lack designated landing facilities, with PIS still outnumbering certified helipads. This reflects structural and regulatory shortcomings that may compromise timely access to specialized care. Enhancing national oversight, modernizing infrastructure, and adopting harmonized European standards are key measures to ensure reliable aeromedical access - and to improve patient outcomes across borders.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12175417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01418-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare systems are increasingly shifting toward specialization and centralization. As a result, distances are growing between emergency patients and suitable emergency hospitals, as well as in between hospitals for interhospital transfers. Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) are essential in maintaining equitable access to emergency care, particularly in rural regions. However, the availability and quality of HEMS landing infrastructure at hospitals remains largely unexamined. This study provides the first nationwide integrated mapping and analysis of emergency care hospital and HEMS landing facility distribution.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional analysis of all German hospitals classified under the Emergency Care Level system (ECL I-III). Using data from hospital quality reports, government registries, and satellite imagery, we assessed the availability and type of HEMS landing facilities, categorized as certified helipads or Public Interest Sites (PIS). The study aimed to map and characterize the emergency care hospital and HEMS infrastructure, identify associated hospital and regional factors, and assess spatial access and data completeness through targeted analyses.

Results: Of 1,037 emergency care hospitals, 69.6% have a designated landing facility, with 44.0% of these featuring a certified helipad and 56.0% relying on PIS. A substantial proportion of hospitals (30.4%) lack any HEMS landing facility, especially in urban areas. Certified helipads are more prevalent at higher-tier emergency hospitals (ECL II and III) but no landing facility is available at 18.3% of these facilities, particularly in metropolitan regions. Hospitals in rural areas are more likely to have a HEMS landing facility.

Conclusions: Despite the crucial role of HEMS in emergency medical care, nearly one-third of Germany's emergency care hospitals lack designated landing facilities, with PIS still outnumbering certified helipads. This reflects structural and regulatory shortcomings that may compromise timely access to specialized care. Enhancing national oversight, modernizing infrastructure, and adopting harmonized European standards are key measures to ensure reliable aeromedical access - and to improve patient outcomes across borders.

可以降落了吗?德国紧急护理医院和医疗急救系统基础设施的全国性分析。
背景:医疗保健系统正日益转向专业化和集中化。因此,急诊病人与合适的急诊医院之间的距离越来越远,医院间转诊的距离也越来越远。直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)对于维持公平获得紧急护理至关重要,特别是在农村地区。然而,医院医疗急救系统着陆基础设施的可用性和质量在很大程度上仍未得到检验。本研究首次在全国范围内对急诊医院和医疗急救系统着陆设施分布进行了综合测绘和分析。方法:我们在全国范围内对急诊护理等级系统(ECL I-III)分类的所有德国医院进行了横断面分析。利用来自医院质量报告、政府登记和卫星图像的数据,我们评估了HEMS着陆设施的可用性和类型,将其分类为经过认证的直升机停机坪或公共利益站点(PIS)。该研究旨在通过有针对性的分析,绘制和表征急诊医院和HEMS基础设施,识别相关的医院和区域因素,并评估空间可及性和数据完整性。结果:在1037家急救医院中,69.6%拥有指定的降落设施,其中44.0%拥有认证的直升机停机坪,56.0%依赖PIS。相当大比例的医院(30.4%)缺乏任何医疗急救降落设施,尤其是在城市地区。经过认证的直升机停机坪在较高级的急救医院(二级和三级急救医院)更为普遍,但18.3%的医院没有着陆设施,特别是在大都市地区。农村地区的医院更有可能有医疗急救降落设施。结论:尽管HEMS在紧急医疗护理中发挥着至关重要的作用,但德国近三分之一的紧急护理医院缺乏指定的降落设施,PIS的数量仍然超过认证的直升机停机坪。这反映了结构性和监管方面的缺陷,可能影响及时获得专业护理。加强国家监督、基础设施现代化和采用统一的欧洲标准是确保可靠的航空医疗准入和改善跨境患者治疗结果的关键措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信