{"title":"'Line' Constraints Optimization for Improved Dose Distribution in Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Using Knowledge-Based Planning.","authors":"Xiaoli Yu, Yixuan Wang, Mingli Wang, Huikuan Gu, Xin Yang, Jiang Hu","doi":"10.1177/15330338251351535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionTo investigate the efficacy of a knowledge-based planning (KBP) model in optimizing dose distribution, and identify the inter-institutional variation in radiotherapy of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC).MethodsA total of 70 rNPC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were recruited to build a KBP model. Following model refinement, 36 patients were retrospectively enrolled for dosimetric comparison between manually optimized and KBP-generated plans. Ten experienced physicists from six different institutions were engaged to independently design manual plan for a representative case, to assess inter-institutional variations, and differences between KBP and manual plans.ResultsThe refined KBP model provided significant reduced dose in brainstem D<sub>1cc</sub> (the dose received by the \"hottest\"1 cm<sup>3</sup> volume, 41.14 ± 8.51 Gy vs 38.48 ± 8.60 Gy, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and spinal cord D<sub>1cc</sub> (17.48 ± 9.38Gy vs 12.23 ± 6.56Gy, <i>P</i> < 0.001). In addition, The mean dose (D<sub>mean)</sub> of brainstem, spinal cord, mandible, parotid, temporomandibular joint and inner ear were statistically decreased (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In validation cohort, KBP model eliminated the hotspot (0.57 ± 0.01% vs 0.00 ± 0.00%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), improved target homogeneity (HI: 0.06 ± 0.00 vs 0.08 ± 0.00, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and performed superior to the manual plans in sparing organs. While all institutions achieved comparable target coverage, manual plans exhibited substantial variability in sparing brainstem. KBP implementation reduced inter-institutional dose disparities for brainstem (46.30 ± 10.08 Gy vs 41.80 ± 5.80 Gy, <i>P</i> = 0.041) and spinal cord (26.08 ± 7.06 Gy vs 18.19 ± 1.98 Gy, <i>P</i> = 0.002). Additionally, planning efficiency increased by 48.7% (39 vs 76 min).ConclusionsThis KBP framework optimized rNPC reirradiation from three dimensions: 1) Enhanced OARs' protection; 2) Improved target homogeneity; 3) Improved the multi-institutional consistency and efficiency of planning. These advancements established a clinically actionable paradigm for precision reirradiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"24 ","pages":"15330338251351535"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12177241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338251351535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionTo investigate the efficacy of a knowledge-based planning (KBP) model in optimizing dose distribution, and identify the inter-institutional variation in radiotherapy of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC).MethodsA total of 70 rNPC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were recruited to build a KBP model. Following model refinement, 36 patients were retrospectively enrolled for dosimetric comparison between manually optimized and KBP-generated plans. Ten experienced physicists from six different institutions were engaged to independently design manual plan for a representative case, to assess inter-institutional variations, and differences between KBP and manual plans.ResultsThe refined KBP model provided significant reduced dose in brainstem D1cc (the dose received by the "hottest"1 cm3 volume, 41.14 ± 8.51 Gy vs 38.48 ± 8.60 Gy, P < 0.001) and spinal cord D1cc (17.48 ± 9.38Gy vs 12.23 ± 6.56Gy, P < 0.001). In addition, The mean dose (Dmean) of brainstem, spinal cord, mandible, parotid, temporomandibular joint and inner ear were statistically decreased (P < 0.05). In validation cohort, KBP model eliminated the hotspot (0.57 ± 0.01% vs 0.00 ± 0.00%, P < 0.001), improved target homogeneity (HI: 0.06 ± 0.00 vs 0.08 ± 0.00, P < 0.001), and performed superior to the manual plans in sparing organs. While all institutions achieved comparable target coverage, manual plans exhibited substantial variability in sparing brainstem. KBP implementation reduced inter-institutional dose disparities for brainstem (46.30 ± 10.08 Gy vs 41.80 ± 5.80 Gy, P = 0.041) and spinal cord (26.08 ± 7.06 Gy vs 18.19 ± 1.98 Gy, P = 0.002). Additionally, planning efficiency increased by 48.7% (39 vs 76 min).ConclusionsThis KBP framework optimized rNPC reirradiation from three dimensions: 1) Enhanced OARs' protection; 2) Improved target homogeneity; 3) Improved the multi-institutional consistency and efficiency of planning. These advancements established a clinically actionable paradigm for precision reirradiation.
目的探讨知识规划(KBP)模型在优化剂量分配中的作用,并确定复发性鼻咽癌(rNPC)放疗的机构间差异。方法选取70例接受调强放疗(IMRT)的rNPC患者,建立KBP模型。在模型改进后,36例患者回顾性入选,进行人工优化和kbp生成计划的剂量学比较。来自6个不同机构的10名经验丰富的物理学家被邀请为一个代表性案例独立设计手工计划,以评估机构间的变化,以及KBP和手工计划之间的差异。结果改进后的KBP模型在脑干、脊髓、下颌骨、腮腺、颞下颌关节和内耳(26.08±7.06 Gy vs 18.19±1.98 Gy, P = 0.002)、脊髓(17.48±9.38Gy vs 12.23±6.56Gy)的D1cc(“最热”1 cm3体积接受的剂量,41.14±8.51 Gy vs 38.48±8.60 Gy)、p1cc (P平均值17.48±9.38Gy vs 12.23±6.56Gy, P均值)和脊髓(26.08±7.06 Gy vs 18.19±1.98 Gy, P = 0.002)均有统计学意义降低。此外,计划效率提高了48.7% (39 vs 76分钟)。结论KBP框架从三个方面优化了rNPC再照射:1)增强了桨叶的保护;2)提高目标均匀性;3)提高了多机构规划的一致性和效率。这些进展为精确再照射建立了临床可操作的范例。
期刊介绍:
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.