"Predicting Resection Weights of Reduction Mammaplasty: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis Using Machine Learning".

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Devin J Clegg, Stefanos Boukovalas, Brett Beaulieu-Jones, Gulsah S Onar, Aaron N Hendizadeh, Kimberley C Brondeel, Michelle Y Seu, Kimberly Khoo, Linda G Phillips, George Kokosis
{"title":"\"Predicting Resection Weights of Reduction Mammaplasty: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis Using Machine Learning\".","authors":"Devin J Clegg, Stefanos Boukovalas, Brett Beaulieu-Jones, Gulsah S Onar, Aaron N Hendizadeh, Kimberley C Brondeel, Michelle Y Seu, Kimberly Khoo, Linda G Phillips, George Kokosis","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A single-institution study performed by our authors demonstrated that machine learning (ML) utilizing preoperative anthropometric variables was an accurate alternative to the Schnur Scale in predicting resection weights during reduction mammaplasty (RM). We sought to evaluate ML and regression modeling in a heterogenous multi-institutional population for predicting RM resection weights with improved accuracy and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-institutional retrospective study was performed including 635 patients from three institutions who underwent RM for macromastia between 2017 and 2022. Preoperative anthropometric variables included body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), sternal notch-to-nipple (SN-N), and nipple-to-inframammary fold (N-IMF) measurements. ML and regression models were evaluated for accuracy in predicting individual and total breast resection weights. The mean absolute errors (MAE) were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study population, mean age at the time of RM was 38.5 years, mean BMI was 32.8 kg/m2, mean BSA was 2.0 m2, mean SN-N was 33.9 cm, and mean N-IMF was 15.3 cm. Preoperative BMI, SN-N, N-IMF, and race/ethnicity were significant covariates. Six of the seven models evaluated demonstrated lower MAEs than the Schnur Scale across individual and total predicted resection weights. Elastic Net regression had the lowest MAEs across individual right (164.2), left (163.8), and total breast resection weight predictions (310.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML and regression modeling demonstrated improved accuracy in predicting resection weights for RM compared to the Schnur Scale in a heterogenous and multi-institutional population. This study provides further evidence of promising alternatives to the Schnur Scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A single-institution study performed by our authors demonstrated that machine learning (ML) utilizing preoperative anthropometric variables was an accurate alternative to the Schnur Scale in predicting resection weights during reduction mammaplasty (RM). We sought to evaluate ML and regression modeling in a heterogenous multi-institutional population for predicting RM resection weights with improved accuracy and generalizability.

Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective study was performed including 635 patients from three institutions who underwent RM for macromastia between 2017 and 2022. Preoperative anthropometric variables included body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), sternal notch-to-nipple (SN-N), and nipple-to-inframammary fold (N-IMF) measurements. ML and regression models were evaluated for accuracy in predicting individual and total breast resection weights. The mean absolute errors (MAE) were reported.

Results: In our study population, mean age at the time of RM was 38.5 years, mean BMI was 32.8 kg/m2, mean BSA was 2.0 m2, mean SN-N was 33.9 cm, and mean N-IMF was 15.3 cm. Preoperative BMI, SN-N, N-IMF, and race/ethnicity were significant covariates. Six of the seven models evaluated demonstrated lower MAEs than the Schnur Scale across individual and total predicted resection weights. Elastic Net regression had the lowest MAEs across individual right (164.2), left (163.8), and total breast resection weight predictions (310.5).

Conclusions: ML and regression modeling demonstrated improved accuracy in predicting resection weights for RM compared to the Schnur Scale in a heterogenous and multi-institutional population. This study provides further evidence of promising alternatives to the Schnur Scale.

预测乳房缩小成形术的切除权重:使用机器学习的多机构回顾性分析。
背景:我们的作者进行的一项单机构研究表明,利用术前人体测量变量的机器学习(ML)是预测乳房缩小成形术(RM)期间切除重量的准确替代Schnur量表。我们试图在异质多机构人群中评估ML和回归模型,以提高准确性和通用性来预测RM切除权重。方法:采用多机构回顾性研究,纳入2017年至2022年间,来自三家机构的635例巨乳症患者。术前人体测量变量包括体表面积(BSA)、体重指数(BMI)、胸骨缺口到乳头(SN-N)和乳头到乳房下褶(N-IMF)测量。评估ML和回归模型预测个体和全乳房切除重量的准确性。报告平均绝对误差(MAE)。结果:研究人群RM时的平均年龄为38.5岁,平均BMI为32.8 kg/m2,平均BSA为2.0 m2,平均SN-N为33.9 cm,平均N-IMF为15.3 cm。术前BMI、SN-N、N-IMF和种族/民族为显著协变量。评估的7个模型中有6个模型在个体和总预测切除权重上的MAEs低于Schnur量表。弹性网回归在个体右侧(164.2)、左侧(163.8)和全乳切除体重预测(310.5)中具有最低的MAEs。结论:在异质性和多机构人群中,与Schnur量表相比,ML和回归模型在预测RM切除权重方面显示出更高的准确性。这项研究为Schnur量表的有希望的替代方案提供了进一步的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信