Does the Sequence of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis Matter for Patients with Multiple Primary Cancers? A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database Cohort Study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Anjelli Wignakumar, Sameh H Emile, Justin Dourado, Victoria De Trolio, Brett P Weiss, Marylise Boutros, Steven D Wexner
{"title":"Does the Sequence of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis Matter for Patients with Multiple Primary Cancers? A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database Cohort Study.","authors":"Anjelli Wignakumar, Sameh H Emile, Justin Dourado, Victoria De Trolio, Brett P Weiss, Marylise Boutros, Steven D Wexner","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to assess features and outcomes of isolated primary colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to CRC presenting in a sequence of multiple primary cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort including patients with stage I-IV colorectal adenocarcinoma from the SEER database (2000-2020) was assessed. Patients were classified into three groups: A: CRC as the only malignancy, B: CRC as the first of multiple primary malignancies, C: CRC as the second of multiple primary malignancies. Primary outcomes were overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From our sample of 592,063 patients, 424,920 (71.8%), 70,432 (11.9%), and 96,711 (16.3%) were in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Group A patients were younger (65.7 vs. 67.3 vs.72.6 years, p<0.001), had elevated pre-treatment CEA (49.7% vs. 43.2% vs. 46.9%, p<0.001), more frequent liver metastases (17.5% vs. 7.4% vs. 12.1%, p<0.001), more frequent lung metastases (6.3% vs. 2.5% vs. 4.2%, p<0.001) and systemic adjuvant treatments (10.4% vs. 8.9% vs. 5.8%, p<0.001). Group A included more T4 tumors (14.5% vs. 10.4% vs. 12.4%, p<0.001) and less surgical treatments than Groups B and C (86.4% vs. 94.8% vs. 88.1%, p<0.001). Group B included more males (57.1% vs. 51.8% vs. 53.1%, p<0.001) and left-sided CRC (37.9% vs. 37.1% vs. 32.2%). Group C entailed more right-sided CRC (38.6% vs. 33.1% vs. 35.3%). Group B had the longest OS and CSS (50.4 and 51.3 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRC presenting as the first of multiple primary malignancies less often presented at an advanced stage, more often underwent surgical treatment and was associated with improved OS and CSS than CRC presenting as an isolated primary or second primary malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess features and outcomes of isolated primary colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to CRC presenting in a sequence of multiple primary cancers.

Methods: A retrospective cohort including patients with stage I-IV colorectal adenocarcinoma from the SEER database (2000-2020) was assessed. Patients were classified into three groups: A: CRC as the only malignancy, B: CRC as the first of multiple primary malignancies, C: CRC as the second of multiple primary malignancies. Primary outcomes were overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results: From our sample of 592,063 patients, 424,920 (71.8%), 70,432 (11.9%), and 96,711 (16.3%) were in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Group A patients were younger (65.7 vs. 67.3 vs.72.6 years, p<0.001), had elevated pre-treatment CEA (49.7% vs. 43.2% vs. 46.9%, p<0.001), more frequent liver metastases (17.5% vs. 7.4% vs. 12.1%, p<0.001), more frequent lung metastases (6.3% vs. 2.5% vs. 4.2%, p<0.001) and systemic adjuvant treatments (10.4% vs. 8.9% vs. 5.8%, p<0.001). Group A included more T4 tumors (14.5% vs. 10.4% vs. 12.4%, p<0.001) and less surgical treatments than Groups B and C (86.4% vs. 94.8% vs. 88.1%, p<0.001). Group B included more males (57.1% vs. 51.8% vs. 53.1%, p<0.001) and left-sided CRC (37.9% vs. 37.1% vs. 32.2%). Group C entailed more right-sided CRC (38.6% vs. 33.1% vs. 35.3%). Group B had the longest OS and CSS (50.4 and 51.3 months).

Conclusion: CRC presenting as the first of multiple primary malignancies less often presented at an advanced stage, more often underwent surgical treatment and was associated with improved OS and CSS than CRC presenting as an isolated primary or second primary malignancy.

结直肠癌诊断顺序对多发原发癌患者有影响吗?一项监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库队列研究。
背景:我们的目的是评估孤立的原发性结直肠癌(CRC)的特征和结果,并将其与以多种原发癌症表现的结直肠癌进行比较。方法:对来自SEER数据库(2000-2020)的I-IV期结直肠癌患者进行回顾性队列评估。将患者分为三组:A: CRC为唯一恶性肿瘤,B: CRC为多发原发恶性肿瘤中的第一种,C: CRC为多发原发恶性肿瘤中的第二种。主要结局是总生存率(OS)和癌症特异性生存率(CSS)。结果:在592,063例患者中,A组、B组和C组分别为424,920例(71.8%)、70,432例(11.9%)和96,711例(16.3%)。A组患者年龄较小(65.7岁vs. 67.3岁vs.72.6岁)。结论:与以孤立原发或第二原发恶性肿瘤表现的CRC相比,以多发原发恶性肿瘤首发出现的CRC较少出现在晚期,更常接受手术治疗,并且与改善的OS和CSS相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信