Efficacy and safety of thalidomide for oncology-related uses approved in Brazil: An overview of systematic reviews.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Paula Lana de Miranda Drummond, Cristine de Araújo Silva, Júlia Estevão de Souza, Bárbara Alice Rocha Magno, Giovanna Marchetti Battaglia, Raissa Carolina Fonseca Candido, Cristiane Aparecida Menezes de Pádua, Bruno Gonçalves Pereira
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of thalidomide for oncology-related uses approved in Brazil: An overview of systematic reviews.","authors":"Paula Lana de Miranda Drummond, Cristine de Araújo Silva, Júlia Estevão de Souza, Bárbara Alice Rocha Magno, Giovanna Marchetti Battaglia, Raissa Carolina Fonseca Candido, Cristiane Aparecida Menezes de Pádua, Bruno Gonçalves Pereira","doi":"10.1177/10781552251348931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The aim of this overview was to summarize evidence of the efficacy and safety of thalidomide in the treatment of oncology-related diseases approved in Brazil, and to assess the quality of the available data. <b>Methods:</b> A literature search was performed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, and SciELO databases. Studies must contain evidence of efficacy and/or safety of thalidomide use for multiple myeloma - MM, graft-versus-host disease - GVHD, and myelodysplastic syndrome - MDS. The extracted information were: authors, year, literature search, studies design, target population, studies sample, comparisons and thalidomide dose, funding, outcomes, results / pooled effect, heterogeneity, conclusion. <b>Results:</b> This overview showed the available data about efficacy and safety of thalidomide used in the treatment of oncology-related approved indications in Brazil. It also classified the methodological quality of studies according to Amstar 2 tool. Despite of the poor quality of the articles found, they supported the efficacy of thalidomide in MM treatment. The main adverse events reported were peripheral neuropathy, infections, hematological, thromboembolic, and gastrointestinal events. Evidence supported that the more drugs combined, the greater the efficacy, but there is also a greater risk of toxicity. For the indications of GVHD and MDS no systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses that met the inclusion criteria were found. <b>Conclusions:</b> The overview confirmed thalidomide's efficacy on MM. It is important to monitor and manage the occurrence of thalidomide-related adverse events. Strict control over its use must always be reinforced to maintain its safe use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552251348931"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552251348931","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this overview was to summarize evidence of the efficacy and safety of thalidomide in the treatment of oncology-related diseases approved in Brazil, and to assess the quality of the available data. Methods: A literature search was performed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, and SciELO databases. Studies must contain evidence of efficacy and/or safety of thalidomide use for multiple myeloma - MM, graft-versus-host disease - GVHD, and myelodysplastic syndrome - MDS. The extracted information were: authors, year, literature search, studies design, target population, studies sample, comparisons and thalidomide dose, funding, outcomes, results / pooled effect, heterogeneity, conclusion. Results: This overview showed the available data about efficacy and safety of thalidomide used in the treatment of oncology-related approved indications in Brazil. It also classified the methodological quality of studies according to Amstar 2 tool. Despite of the poor quality of the articles found, they supported the efficacy of thalidomide in MM treatment. The main adverse events reported were peripheral neuropathy, infections, hematological, thromboembolic, and gastrointestinal events. Evidence supported that the more drugs combined, the greater the efficacy, but there is also a greater risk of toxicity. For the indications of GVHD and MDS no systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses that met the inclusion criteria were found. Conclusions: The overview confirmed thalidomide's efficacy on MM. It is important to monitor and manage the occurrence of thalidomide-related adverse events. Strict control over its use must always be reinforced to maintain its safe use.

巴西批准沙利度胺用于肿瘤相关用途的有效性和安全性:系统评价综述
目的:本综述的目的是总结在巴西批准的沙利度胺治疗肿瘤相关疾病的有效性和安全性的证据,并评估现有数据的质量。方法:在Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、Lilacs和SciELO数据库中进行文献检索。研究必须包含沙利度胺用于多发性骨髓瘤(MM)、移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)和骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的有效性和/或安全性的证据。提取的信息包括:作者、年份、文献检索、研究设计、目标人群、研究样本、比较和沙利度胺剂量、资助、结局、结果/合并效应、异质性、结论。结果:本综述显示了沙利度胺在巴西用于治疗肿瘤相关经批准适应症的有效性和安全性的现有数据。并根据Amstar 2工具对研究的方法学质量进行了分类。尽管发现的文章质量较差,但它们支持沙利度胺治疗MM的疗效。报告的主要不良事件为周围神经病变、感染、血液学、血栓栓塞和胃肠道事件。有证据表明,联合使用的药物越多,疗效越好,但毒性风险也越大。对于GVHD和MDS的适应症,没有发现符合纳入标准的系统评价和/或荟萃分析。结论:综述证实了沙利度胺对MM的疗效,监测和管理沙利度胺相关不良事件的发生十分重要。必须始终加强对其使用的严格控制,以保持其安全使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信