Treatment of Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea With Collateral Puncture Therapy: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Aolin Song, Bingnan Cui, Xuemin Wang, Jianing Bi, Xiaohong Wu, Liu Yang, Li Liu, Shengyuan Qu, Zhu Fan, Jiao Yang, Yuhe Yan
{"title":"Treatment of Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea With Collateral Puncture Therapy: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Aolin Song, Bingnan Cui, Xuemin Wang, Jianing Bi, Xiaohong Wu, Liu Yang, Li Liu, Shengyuan Qu, Zhu Fan, Jiao Yang, Yuhe Yan","doi":"10.2196/59682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR) is the most common subtype of rosacea, characterized by persistent facial erythema and telangiectasia of varying calibers. It causes significant aesthetic impairment and is often accompanied by uncomfortable symptoms, such as burning, stinging, dryness, and itching, profoundly affecting patients' quality of life. Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy demonstrates notable improvement in persistent erythema and telangiectasia; however, it is associated with issues such as a prolonged treatment course and high costs. Collateral puncture therapy involves rapid puncturing of specific acupuncture points followed by gentle squeezing around the needle holes to induce minor bleeding. Previous studies have shown that collateral puncture therapy for ETR offers advantages such as rapid onset of effect, a simple procedure, and low cost. Nevertheless, more high-quality clinical research data are needed to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to observe the clinical efficacy and safety of collateral puncture therapy in treating ETR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 60 patients diagnosed with ETR. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: one group underwent 4 sessions of collateral puncture therapy with 1-week intervals between treatments, and the other group received a single session of IPL therapy. The primary efficacy end points were the clinician's erythema assessment and the clinician's telangiectasia assessment. The secondary efficacy end points included the investigator's global assessment, patient's self-assessment, Flushing Assessment Tool results, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and Rosacea-specific Quality-of-Life instrument. The evaluation points were before treatment, immediately after treatment, and during follow-up. The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS (version 25.0; IBM Corp) to compare intragroup and intergroup differences between the 2 sets of data before and after treatment, with a significance level of α=.05 for hypothesis testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment began on June 1, 2023. All participants have been recruited. Data analysis will be complete by the end of August 2025, with study findings available by December 2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has the potential to verify the clinical efficacy and safety of collateral puncture therapy in the treatment of ETR, supplement rosacea treatment methods, standardize treatment protocols, and fill a current clinical gap in treating rosacea.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200062639; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177100.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/59682.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e59682"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12214693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR) is the most common subtype of rosacea, characterized by persistent facial erythema and telangiectasia of varying calibers. It causes significant aesthetic impairment and is often accompanied by uncomfortable symptoms, such as burning, stinging, dryness, and itching, profoundly affecting patients' quality of life. Intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy demonstrates notable improvement in persistent erythema and telangiectasia; however, it is associated with issues such as a prolonged treatment course and high costs. Collateral puncture therapy involves rapid puncturing of specific acupuncture points followed by gentle squeezing around the needle holes to induce minor bleeding. Previous studies have shown that collateral puncture therapy for ETR offers advantages such as rapid onset of effect, a simple procedure, and low cost. Nevertheless, more high-quality clinical research data are needed to confirm these findings.

Objective: This study aims to observe the clinical efficacy and safety of collateral puncture therapy in treating ETR.

Methods: This study enrolled 60 patients diagnosed with ETR. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: one group underwent 4 sessions of collateral puncture therapy with 1-week intervals between treatments, and the other group received a single session of IPL therapy. The primary efficacy end points were the clinician's erythema assessment and the clinician's telangiectasia assessment. The secondary efficacy end points included the investigator's global assessment, patient's self-assessment, Flushing Assessment Tool results, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and Rosacea-specific Quality-of-Life instrument. The evaluation points were before treatment, immediately after treatment, and during follow-up. The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS (version 25.0; IBM Corp) to compare intragroup and intergroup differences between the 2 sets of data before and after treatment, with a significance level of α=.05 for hypothesis testing.

Results: Recruitment began on June 1, 2023. All participants have been recruited. Data analysis will be complete by the end of August 2025, with study findings available by December 2025.

Conclusions: This study has the potential to verify the clinical efficacy and safety of collateral puncture therapy in the treatment of ETR, supplement rosacea treatment methods, standardize treatment protocols, and fill a current clinical gap in treating rosacea.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200062639; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177100.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/59682.

侧枝穿刺治疗红斑毛细血管扩张型酒糟鼻:一项随机对照试验方案。
背景:红斑毛细血管扩张型酒渣鼻(ETR)是最常见的酒渣鼻亚型,其特征是持续的面部红斑和不同口径的毛细血管扩张。它会造成严重的审美损害,并常伴有不适症状,如灼烧、刺痛、干燥、瘙痒,严重影响患者的生活质量。强脉冲光(IPL)治疗对持续性红斑和毛细血管扩张有显著改善;然而,它与治疗过程延长和费用高等问题有关。侧枝穿刺疗法包括快速穿刺特定的穴位,然后在针孔周围轻柔地挤压,以引起少量出血。既往研究表明,侧枝穿刺治疗ETR具有起效快、操作简单、费用低等优点。然而,需要更多高质量的临床研究数据来证实这些发现。目的:观察侧枝穿刺治疗ETR的临床疗效和安全性。方法:本研究纳入60例诊断为ETR的患者。将患者随机分为两组,一组进行4次侧支穿刺治疗,治疗间隔1周,另一组进行单次IPL治疗。主要疗效终点是临床医生的红斑评估和临床医生的毛细血管扩张评估。次要疗效终点包括研究者总体评估、患者自我评估、潮红评估工具结果、皮肤病生活质量指数和酒渣鼻特异性生活质量工具。评价点为治疗前、治疗后即刻、随访期间。采用SPSS (version 25.0;IBM公司)比较治疗前后两组数据的组内和组间差异,显著性水平为α=。05为假设检验。结果:招聘于2023年6月1日开始。所有参与者都已被招募。数据分析将于2025年8月底完成,研究结果将于2025年12月公布。结论:本研究具有验证侧支穿刺治疗ETR的临床疗效和安全性,补充酒渣鼻治疗方法,规范治疗方案,填补目前临床上治疗酒渣鼻的空白的潜力。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR2200062639;https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=177100.International注册报告标识符(irrid): DERR1-10.2196/59682。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信