Nasal nitric oxide measurement for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia: summary of the European Respiratory Society technical standard.

IF 2.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Breathe Pub Date : 2025-06-17 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1183/20734735.0230-2024
Diana Marangu-Boore, Jane S Lucas, Nicole Beydon
{"title":"Nasal nitric oxide measurement for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia: summary of the European Respiratory Society technical standard.","authors":"Diana Marangu-Boore, Jane S Lucas, Nicole Beydon","doi":"10.1183/20734735.0230-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) measurement is important in the primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) diagnostic pathway because levels are consistently very low in most patients. Machine type, environmental factors, respiratory manoeuvres and report interpretation are fundamental considerations when performing nNO testing. A European Respiratory Society Task Force recently published standards for testing which we summarise and discuss in this article. There are two main types of nNO machines: chemiluminescence and electrochemical analysers. Chemiluminescence analysers are highly accurate, reliable, real-time and have been validated in multicentre studies but are less portable and more expensive to purchase and maintain in comparison to electrochemical devices. Several factors may influence nNO levels and need to be addressed during patient preparation for testing. Factors including acute viral infections and nose bleeds may contribute to falsely low nNO levels, whereas high ambient NO levels may falsely increase nNO. Tidal breathing, breath-hold and exhalation against resistance are the three main respiratory manoeuvres used in nNO sampling and require a minimal, modest and high level of patient cooperation respectively. Finally, standardised reporting of nNO testing and the correct interpretation helps clinicians to formulate an appropriate clinical plan towards an accurate PCD diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9292,"journal":{"name":"Breathe","volume":"21 2","pages":"240230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12171850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breathe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.0230-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) measurement is important in the primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) diagnostic pathway because levels are consistently very low in most patients. Machine type, environmental factors, respiratory manoeuvres and report interpretation are fundamental considerations when performing nNO testing. A European Respiratory Society Task Force recently published standards for testing which we summarise and discuss in this article. There are two main types of nNO machines: chemiluminescence and electrochemical analysers. Chemiluminescence analysers are highly accurate, reliable, real-time and have been validated in multicentre studies but are less portable and more expensive to purchase and maintain in comparison to electrochemical devices. Several factors may influence nNO levels and need to be addressed during patient preparation for testing. Factors including acute viral infections and nose bleeds may contribute to falsely low nNO levels, whereas high ambient NO levels may falsely increase nNO. Tidal breathing, breath-hold and exhalation against resistance are the three main respiratory manoeuvres used in nNO sampling and require a minimal, modest and high level of patient cooperation respectively. Finally, standardised reporting of nNO testing and the correct interpretation helps clinicians to formulate an appropriate clinical plan towards an accurate PCD diagnosis.

鼻部一氧化氮测量诊断原发性纤毛运动障碍:欧洲呼吸学会技术标准综述。
鼻腔一氧化氮(nNO)测量在原发性纤毛运动障碍(PCD)诊断途径中很重要,因为大多数患者的水平一直很低。机器类型,环境因素,呼吸操作和报告解释是进行nNO测试时的基本考虑因素。欧洲呼吸学会工作组最近发布了我们在本文中总结和讨论的测试标准。有两种主要类型的nNO机器:化学发光和电化学分析仪。化学发光分析仪高度准确、可靠、实时,并已在多中心研究中得到验证,但与电化学设备相比,便携性较差,购买和维护成本较高。有几个因素可能影响一氧化氮水平,需要在患者准备检测期间加以解决。包括急性病毒感染和流鼻血在内的因素可能导致一氧化氮水平虚低,而高环境一氧化氮水平可能导致一氧化氮水平虚高。潮汐呼吸、屏气和抗阻力呼气是nNO采样中使用的三种主要呼吸方法,分别要求患者进行最低限度、适度和高度的配合。最后,标准化的nNO检测报告和正确的解释有助于临床医生制定适当的临床计划,以准确诊断PCD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breathe
Breathe RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信