Acceptability and feasibility of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing using SD Biosensor by village malaria workers in Cambodia: a qualitative study.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sarah A Cassidy-Seyoum, Bipin Adhikari, Keoratha Chheng, Phal Chanpheakdey, Agnes Meershoek, Michelle S Hsiang, Lorenz von Seidlein, Rupam Tripura, Benedikt Ley, Ric N Price, Lek Dysoley, Kamala Thriemer, Nora Engel
{"title":"Acceptability and feasibility of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing using SD Biosensor by village malaria workers in Cambodia: a qualitative study.","authors":"Sarah A Cassidy-Seyoum, Bipin Adhikari, Keoratha Chheng, Phal Chanpheakdey, Agnes Meershoek, Michelle S Hsiang, Lorenz von Seidlein, Rupam Tripura, Benedikt Ley, Ric N Price, Lek Dysoley, Kamala Thriemer, Nora Engel","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong><i>Plasmodium vivax</i> is the predominant cause of malaria in the Greater Mekong Subregion. To ensure safe treatment with primaquine, point-of-care glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing was rolled out in Cambodia at the health facility level, although most malaria patients are diagnosed in the community. The current study aims to explore the acceptability and feasibility of implementing community-level G6PD testing in Cambodia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews and focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted. Across eight study sites in three provinces, 142 respondents, including policymakers, programme officers, healthcare providers and patients, participated in 67 interviews and 19 FGDs in 2022 and 2023. Data were analysed thematically using an adapted framework derived from Bowen <i>et al</i>'s feasibility framework and Sekhon <i>et al</i>'s acceptability framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All stakeholders attributed value to the intervention. Acknowledging an intervention's different values can help discern policy implications for an intervention's successful implementation. Building and maintaining confidence in the device, end users, infrastructure and health systems were found to be key elements of acceptability. In general, health centre workers and village malaria workers (VMWs) had confidence that VMWs could conduct the test and administer treatment given appropriate initial training, monthly refresher training and the test's repeated use. More is required to build policymakers' confidence, while some implementation challenges, including the test's regulatory approval, stability above 30°C and cost, need to be overcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of G6PD testing at the community level in Cambodia is an acceptable and potentially feasible option but requires addressing implementation challenges and building and maintaining confidence among stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019615","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Plasmodium vivax is the predominant cause of malaria in the Greater Mekong Subregion. To ensure safe treatment with primaquine, point-of-care glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing was rolled out in Cambodia at the health facility level, although most malaria patients are diagnosed in the community. The current study aims to explore the acceptability and feasibility of implementing community-level G6PD testing in Cambodia.

Methods: Semistructured interviews and focus group discussions (FGD) were conducted. Across eight study sites in three provinces, 142 respondents, including policymakers, programme officers, healthcare providers and patients, participated in 67 interviews and 19 FGDs in 2022 and 2023. Data were analysed thematically using an adapted framework derived from Bowen et al's feasibility framework and Sekhon et al's acceptability framework.

Results: All stakeholders attributed value to the intervention. Acknowledging an intervention's different values can help discern policy implications for an intervention's successful implementation. Building and maintaining confidence in the device, end users, infrastructure and health systems were found to be key elements of acceptability. In general, health centre workers and village malaria workers (VMWs) had confidence that VMWs could conduct the test and administer treatment given appropriate initial training, monthly refresher training and the test's repeated use. More is required to build policymakers' confidence, while some implementation challenges, including the test's regulatory approval, stability above 30°C and cost, need to be overcome.

Conclusion: Implementation of G6PD testing at the community level in Cambodia is an acceptable and potentially feasible option but requires addressing implementation challenges and building and maintaining confidence among stakeholders.

柬埔寨乡村疟疾工作者使用SD生物传感器检测葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶(G6PD)的可接受性和可行性:一项定性研究
导言:间日疟原虫是大湄公河次区域疟疾的主要病因。为确保用伯氨喹进行安全治疗,柬埔寨在卫生机构一级推出了即时葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶(G6PD)检测,尽管大多数疟疾患者是在社区得到诊断的。本研究旨在探讨在柬埔寨实施社区级G6PD检测的可接受性和可行性。方法:采用半结构化访谈法和焦点小组讨论法。在三个省的八个研究地点,142名受访者,包括政策制定者、方案官员、医疗保健提供者和患者,在2022年和2023年参加了67次访谈和19次fgd。使用Bowen等人的可行性框架和Sekhon等人的可接受性框架衍生的改编框架对数据进行主题分析。结果:所有利益相关者都认为干预有价值。承认干预措施的不同价值有助于辨别干预措施成功实施的政策含义。建立和保持对设备、最终用户、基础设施和卫生系统的信心是可接受性的关键因素。总的来说,保健中心工作人员和乡村疟疾工作人员相信,只要接受适当的初步培训、每月的进修培训和反复使用测试,乡村疟疾工作人员就可以进行测试并实施治疗。建立政策制定者的信心还需要做更多的工作,同时还需要克服一些实施方面的挑战,包括测试的监管批准、30℃以上的稳定性和成本。结论:在柬埔寨社区层面实施G6PD测试是一种可接受的、潜在可行的选择,但需要解决实施挑战,并在利益相关者之间建立和维护信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信