{"title":"Bringing the EU Back In: Rethinking the United Kingdom's Post-Brexit Bilateralism","authors":"Cleo Davies, Hussein Kassim","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although the bilateral deals it has struck with European neighbours are a key element of the United Kingdom's post-Brexit diplomacy, it would be a mistake to view these understandings as evidence that the United Kingdom has escaped the EU's influence or orbit. Since the United Kingdom's co-signatories are bound by their legal and political commitments as EU member states, the deals they can conclude with non-members are limited. Inspired by the work of John Erik Fossum and his collaborators on post-Brexit Norway–UK relations, this article argues that the United Kingdom's interaction with EU member states forms one side of a triangular relationship constrained by both the obligations on the United Kingdom's European partners qua member states and EU–UK agreements. Drawing on a systematic analysis of UK bilaterals signed with EU countries since 2021, it shows how their form, scope and content are thereby limited by these constraints, with important implications for the United Kingdom's strategy of bilateralism post-Brexit.</p>","PeriodicalId":51369,"journal":{"name":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":"63 4","pages":"1318-1339"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcms.13716","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcms-Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.13716","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although the bilateral deals it has struck with European neighbours are a key element of the United Kingdom's post-Brexit diplomacy, it would be a mistake to view these understandings as evidence that the United Kingdom has escaped the EU's influence or orbit. Since the United Kingdom's co-signatories are bound by their legal and political commitments as EU member states, the deals they can conclude with non-members are limited. Inspired by the work of John Erik Fossum and his collaborators on post-Brexit Norway–UK relations, this article argues that the United Kingdom's interaction with EU member states forms one side of a triangular relationship constrained by both the obligations on the United Kingdom's European partners qua member states and EU–UK agreements. Drawing on a systematic analysis of UK bilaterals signed with EU countries since 2021, it shows how their form, scope and content are thereby limited by these constraints, with important implications for the United Kingdom's strategy of bilateralism post-Brexit.
尽管英国与欧洲邻国达成的双边协议是英国脱欧后外交的关键要素,但将这些协议视为英国已经脱离欧盟影响或轨道的证据将是错误的。由于英国作为欧盟成员国的共同签署国受到其法律和政治承诺的约束,它们可以与非欧盟成员国达成的协议是有限的。受John Erik Fossum及其合作者关于英国脱欧后挪威与英国关系的研究启发,本文认为,英国与欧盟成员国的互动构成了受英国作为成员国的欧洲伙伴义务和欧盟-英国协议约束的三角关系的一面。通过对英国自2021年以来与欧盟国家签署的双边协议的系统分析,揭示了这些协议的形式、范围和内容是如何受到这些约束的限制的,这对英国脱欧后的双边主义战略具有重要意义。