Determination of the Optimal Channel Configuration for Land Surface Temperature Retrieval Using Split Window Algorithm

Youying Guo;Xiaopo Zheng;Zhongliang Zhou;Dahui Li;Zhenyu Wang
{"title":"Determination of the Optimal Channel Configuration for Land Surface Temperature Retrieval Using Split Window Algorithm","authors":"Youying Guo;Xiaopo Zheng;Zhongliang Zhou;Dahui Li;Zhenyu Wang","doi":"10.1109/LGRS.2025.3579608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, various algorithms have been developed to retrieve regional and global land surface temperature (LST) from satellite thermal infrared (TIR) observations, among which the split window (SW) algorithm is the most widely used one. However, the LST retrieval accuracy would be affected by the channel centers and channel widths owing to the vast atmospheric conditions and land surface types around the world. The theoretical channel configuration leading to the best performance of the SW algorithm is still not well investigated currently. In this study, the LST retrieval accuracies of the SW algorithm using different channel configurations were studied iteratively through the whole TIR atmospheric window. Consequently, the two channels centered at 10.3 and <inline-formula> <tex-math>$11.5~\\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>m with the widths of 0.3 and <inline-formula> <tex-math>$0.4~\\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>m were found to be the optimal channel configuration for applying the SW algorithm. Based on the global atmospheric profiles provided in the ERA5 and SeeBor V5.0 database and the emissivity spectra provided in the ECOSTRESS library, the performance of the SW algorithm using the determined channel configuration was delicately evaluated. Results show that the LST retrieval root mean square error (RMSE) of the determined channel configuration was 1.09 K, better than that of the MODIS (1.28 K), Landsat-9 (1.24 K), and Sentinel-3 A (1.24 K) instruments regarding the global atmospheric profiles provided in the ERA5 database. Similar results were obtained corresponding to SeeBor V5.0 atmospheric profiles with the LST retrieval RMSE of 1.28 K (determined channel configuration), 1.49 K (MODIS), 1.96 K (Landsat-9), and 1.94 K (Sentinel-3 A).","PeriodicalId":91017,"journal":{"name":"IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters : a publication of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society","volume":"22 ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters : a publication of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11036179/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, various algorithms have been developed to retrieve regional and global land surface temperature (LST) from satellite thermal infrared (TIR) observations, among which the split window (SW) algorithm is the most widely used one. However, the LST retrieval accuracy would be affected by the channel centers and channel widths owing to the vast atmospheric conditions and land surface types around the world. The theoretical channel configuration leading to the best performance of the SW algorithm is still not well investigated currently. In this study, the LST retrieval accuracies of the SW algorithm using different channel configurations were studied iteratively through the whole TIR atmospheric window. Consequently, the two channels centered at 10.3 and $11.5~\mu $ m with the widths of 0.3 and $0.4~\mu $ m were found to be the optimal channel configuration for applying the SW algorithm. Based on the global atmospheric profiles provided in the ERA5 and SeeBor V5.0 database and the emissivity spectra provided in the ECOSTRESS library, the performance of the SW algorithm using the determined channel configuration was delicately evaluated. Results show that the LST retrieval root mean square error (RMSE) of the determined channel configuration was 1.09 K, better than that of the MODIS (1.28 K), Landsat-9 (1.24 K), and Sentinel-3 A (1.24 K) instruments regarding the global atmospheric profiles provided in the ERA5 database. Similar results were obtained corresponding to SeeBor V5.0 atmospheric profiles with the LST retrieval RMSE of 1.28 K (determined channel configuration), 1.49 K (MODIS), 1.96 K (Landsat-9), and 1.94 K (Sentinel-3 A).
利用分割窗算法确定地表温度检索的最优通道配置
目前,从卫星热红外(TIR)观测数据中提取区域和全球地表温度(LST)的算法有多种,其中劈裂窗(SW)算法应用最为广泛。然而,由于全球大气条件和地表类型的差异,地表温度反演精度会受到通道中心和通道宽度的影响。导致SW算法最佳性能的理论信道配置目前还没有得到很好的研究。在整个TIR大气窗口中,迭代研究了不同信道配置下SW算法的地表温度反演精度。因此,以10.3和$11.5~\mu $ m为中心,宽度分别为0.3和$0.4~\mu $ m的两个通道是应用SW算法的最佳通道配置。基于ERA5和SeeBor V5.0数据库提供的全球大气廓线和ECOSTRESS数据库提供的发射率光谱,在确定通道配置的情况下,对SW算法的性能进行了精细评估。结果表明,在ERA5数据库提供的全球大气廓线上,通道配置的地表温度反演均方根误差(RMSE)为1.09 K,优于MODIS (1.28 K)、Landsat-9 (1.24 K)和Sentinel-3 A (1.24 K)仪器。sebor V5.0大气剖面对应的LST反演RMSE分别为1.28 K(确定通道配置)、1.49 K (MODIS)、1.96 K (Landsat-9)和1.94 K (Sentinel-3 A)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信