Student engagement with oral feedback on second language learning: A methodological review

IF 5.6 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jing Liu, Wei Su
{"title":"Student engagement with oral feedback on second language learning: A methodological review","authors":"Jing Liu,&nbsp;Wei Su","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2025.103752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The effectiveness of feedback and its impact on learning outcomes ultimately depend on whether and how students respond to feedback, that it, students' engagement with feedback. Research on this topic has received increasing scholarly attention. Compared to research on engagement with written feedback, less is known regarding how students engage with oral feedback. Given the real-time interactions between feedback givers and receivers enabled by oral feedback, coupled with multi-modality of visual and aural information exchanges, students' engagement with oral feedback is very likely to differ from that with written feedback. An investigation into this area can enhance the current understanding of engagement as a complex construct. Accordingly, this study systematically reviewed 40 empirical studies from a methodological perspective, since one possible reason for the limited attention to engagement with oral feedback is the difficulty of capturing and analyzing the highly transient oral delivery. The review found that most research did not provide clear or focused conceptualizations or theoretical frameworks of engagement. In addition, the most frequently adopted research design was the convergent design, the most frequent methods were surveys and observation, with the most common instruments being video/audio recordings and questionnaires. In response, it is suggested that, theoretically, more consensus should be reached concerning the terminology, theoretical frameworks, and conceptualizations. In terms of research foci, more efforts are needed to comprehensively explore the three dimensions of engagement (i.e., behavioral, cognitive, and affective), potential indicators, innovative methods, and engagement with alternative feedback types. Finally, the influencing factors in the engagement process (e.g., teaching contexts, feedback foci, learners’ motivation) merit special attention, since they are indispensable for a thorough comprehension of engagement with feedback.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103752"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X25001629","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effectiveness of feedback and its impact on learning outcomes ultimately depend on whether and how students respond to feedback, that it, students' engagement with feedback. Research on this topic has received increasing scholarly attention. Compared to research on engagement with written feedback, less is known regarding how students engage with oral feedback. Given the real-time interactions between feedback givers and receivers enabled by oral feedback, coupled with multi-modality of visual and aural information exchanges, students' engagement with oral feedback is very likely to differ from that with written feedback. An investigation into this area can enhance the current understanding of engagement as a complex construct. Accordingly, this study systematically reviewed 40 empirical studies from a methodological perspective, since one possible reason for the limited attention to engagement with oral feedback is the difficulty of capturing and analyzing the highly transient oral delivery. The review found that most research did not provide clear or focused conceptualizations or theoretical frameworks of engagement. In addition, the most frequently adopted research design was the convergent design, the most frequent methods were surveys and observation, with the most common instruments being video/audio recordings and questionnaires. In response, it is suggested that, theoretically, more consensus should be reached concerning the terminology, theoretical frameworks, and conceptualizations. In terms of research foci, more efforts are needed to comprehensively explore the three dimensions of engagement (i.e., behavioral, cognitive, and affective), potential indicators, innovative methods, and engagement with alternative feedback types. Finally, the influencing factors in the engagement process (e.g., teaching contexts, feedback foci, learners’ motivation) merit special attention, since they are indispensable for a thorough comprehension of engagement with feedback.
第二语言学习中学生口头反馈的参与:方法论回顾
反馈的有效性及其对学习成果的影响最终取决于学生是否以及如何回应反馈,也就是说,学生对反馈的参与。关于这一主题的研究已受到越来越多的学术关注。与参与书面反馈的研究相比,关于学生如何参与口头反馈的研究知之甚少。由于口头反馈使反馈的提供者和接受者之间能够实时互动,再加上视觉和听觉信息的多模态交流,学生对口头反馈的参与很可能与书面反馈不同。对这一领域的调查可以加强目前对敬业作为一个复杂结构的理解。因此,本研究从方法论的角度系统地回顾了40项实证研究,因为对口头反馈的关注有限的一个可能原因是难以捕捉和分析高度短暂的口头传递。审查发现,大多数研究没有提供明确或集中的概念或参与的理论框架。此外,最常采用的研究设计是趋同设计,最常用的方法是调查和观察,最常用的工具是录像/录音和问卷调查。因此,建议在理论上就术语、理论框架和概念化达成更多的共识。在研究重点方面,需要对参与的三个维度(即行为、认知和情感)、潜在指标、创新方法和替代反馈类型的参与进行更多的综合探索。最后,参与过程中的影响因素(如教学情境、反馈焦点、学习者动机)值得特别关注,因为它们对于全面理解参与反馈是不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信