{"title":"SPARTA: A flux adjustment methodology to interpret complex experiments","authors":"Paul A. Ferney, Ben A. Baker, Mark D. DeHart","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To accurately determine reactivity from a detector count rate, correcting spatial effects is of prime importance. Simulation methodologies are often used for spatial correction, but they may introduce an additional source of uncertainty if the results of the experiment are also used as the input data for the simulation. This work presents a flux adjustment methodology that can infer experimental reactivity and correct spatial effects without the need for a simulation. It can process the detector signal(s) from a complex experiment, such as a heat balance measurement in the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) in which control rods are continuously adjusted to maintain a constant power. The methodology presented in this work successfully computed the reactivity and the local spatial variation of the flux from a generated signal. It also proved to be robust against noise and errors on kinetic parameters and provided a credible interpretation of a heat balance experiment in TREAT. An efficient flux adjustment method for complex experiments enables better experiment interpretation that is less reliant on nuclear data evaluations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 111623"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454925004402","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To accurately determine reactivity from a detector count rate, correcting spatial effects is of prime importance. Simulation methodologies are often used for spatial correction, but they may introduce an additional source of uncertainty if the results of the experiment are also used as the input data for the simulation. This work presents a flux adjustment methodology that can infer experimental reactivity and correct spatial effects without the need for a simulation. It can process the detector signal(s) from a complex experiment, such as a heat balance measurement in the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) in which control rods are continuously adjusted to maintain a constant power. The methodology presented in this work successfully computed the reactivity and the local spatial variation of the flux from a generated signal. It also proved to be robust against noise and errors on kinetic parameters and provided a credible interpretation of a heat balance experiment in TREAT. An efficient flux adjustment method for complex experiments enables better experiment interpretation that is less reliant on nuclear data evaluations.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.