Reinforcement effectiveness of stacked prefabricated vertical drain (S-PVD) vacuum preloading method: A case study

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Huayang Lei , Jiankai Li , Shuangxi Feng , Tianlu Ma , Guoqing Zhang , Shengpeng Yu
{"title":"Reinforcement effectiveness of stacked prefabricated vertical drain (S-PVD) vacuum preloading method: A case study","authors":"Huayang Lei ,&nbsp;Jiankai Li ,&nbsp;Shuangxi Feng ,&nbsp;Tianlu Ma ,&nbsp;Guoqing Zhang ,&nbsp;Shengpeng Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address the issue of vacuum pressure attenuation in traditional vacuum preloading ground reinforcement methods, this study proposes a stacked prefabricated vertical drain (S-PVD) vacuum preloading method based on the stratified sealing drainage technology. A comprehensive field test was conducted to comparatively analyze the reinforcement effectiveness of three vacuum preloading approaches: conventional prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs), reverse prefabricated vertical drains (R-PVDs), and the novel S-PVDs. Test results demonstrate that the S-PVD method not only significantly enhances the ground reinforcement effect, effectively increasing surface settlement and vane shear strength of the soil, but also improves the uniformity of the reinforced soil, with only a 4.6 % difference in the vane shear strength between the top and bottom of the drainage board. In addition, the S-PVD method can meet the unloading criteria in less than 30 days, reducing the consolidation period by 34.1 %. The optimized S-PVD system demonstrates notable cost-effectiveness through energy-efficient operation and accelerated consolidation, achieving 26.5 % reduction in unit area cost of materials and electricity compared to conventional vacuum preloading. These findings suggest that the S-PVD method represents a promising innovation in deep soil stabilization technology, offering a technically and economically viable solution for soft ground improvement in coastal regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 1266-1280"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114425000779","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address the issue of vacuum pressure attenuation in traditional vacuum preloading ground reinforcement methods, this study proposes a stacked prefabricated vertical drain (S-PVD) vacuum preloading method based on the stratified sealing drainage technology. A comprehensive field test was conducted to comparatively analyze the reinforcement effectiveness of three vacuum preloading approaches: conventional prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs), reverse prefabricated vertical drains (R-PVDs), and the novel S-PVDs. Test results demonstrate that the S-PVD method not only significantly enhances the ground reinforcement effect, effectively increasing surface settlement and vane shear strength of the soil, but also improves the uniformity of the reinforced soil, with only a 4.6 % difference in the vane shear strength between the top and bottom of the drainage board. In addition, the S-PVD method can meet the unloading criteria in less than 30 days, reducing the consolidation period by 34.1 %. The optimized S-PVD system demonstrates notable cost-effectiveness through energy-efficient operation and accelerated consolidation, achieving 26.5 % reduction in unit area cost of materials and electricity compared to conventional vacuum preloading. These findings suggest that the S-PVD method represents a promising innovation in deep soil stabilization technology, offering a technically and economically viable solution for soft ground improvement in coastal regions.
堆垛预制垂直排水管(S-PVD)真空预压加固效果的实例研究
针对传统真空预压地面加固方法存在的真空压力衰减问题,提出了一种基于分层密封排水技术的堆叠预制垂直排水(S-PVD)真空预压方法。通过现场综合试验,对比分析了传统预制垂直排水管(PVDs)、反向预制垂直排水管(R-PVDs)和新型S-PVDs三种真空预压方式的加固效果。试验结果表明,S-PVD法不仅显著增强了地基加固效果,有效提高了土体的地表沉降和叶片抗剪强度,而且改善了加筋土的均匀性,排水板顶部和底部的叶片抗剪强度仅相差4.6%。此外,S-PVD法可在30天内达到卸载标准,将固结周期缩短34.1%。优化后的S-PVD系统具有显著的成本效益,通过节能操作和加速固化,与传统真空预压相比,单位面积材料和电力成本降低了26.5%。这些研究结果表明,S-PVD方法代表了深土稳定技术的一个有前途的创新,为沿海地区软土地基的改善提供了技术和经济上可行的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotextiles and Geomembranes 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
21.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident. Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信