Missed opportunities: Germline testing following tumor sequencing

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hannah C. Karpel , Simone Sasse , Bhavana Pothuri
{"title":"Missed opportunities: Germline testing following tumor sequencing","authors":"Hannah C. Karpel ,&nbsp;Simone Sasse ,&nbsp;Bhavana Pothuri","doi":"10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Tumor next generation sequencing (NGS) may identify potential germline DNA mutations associated with cancer susceptibility. We describe the frequency of tumor NGS results in patients meeting ESMO 2019 recommendations for germline genetic testing (GT) and reasons for not undergoing germline GT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study (Sept. 2019-Feb. 2022) in a large, urban healthcare system identified patients meeting ESMO guidelines for potentially actionable germline mutations on NGS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 3470 patients who underwent tumor NGS, 326 (9.4 %) had at least one potential actionable germline mutation. Of eligible patients, 189 (58.0 %) did not receive germline GT. Reasons for not undergoing GT include: 127 (67.2 %), not referred for GT; 30 (15.9 %), referred but did not attend genetic counseling; 32 (16.9 %), declined, died before GT, had insufficient samples, lacked insurance or lost to follow-up. Among 127 patients not referred for germline GT (39.0 % of the total eligible cohort), the most common cancer types were lung (33.0 %), colorectal (9.4 %), and cancer of unknown primary (9.4 %). Overall, 64 (50.4 %) patients not referred for germline GT had mutations in <em>BRCA1</em>/2 and/or Lynch syndrome genes. Of 137 patients who underwent germline GT, 86 (62.8 %) had positive GT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this cohort, 60 % of the eligible population by ESMO criteria did not receive GT, most commonly due to lack of referral (over 2/3 of patients). Further, 50 % of patients not referred for GT had mutations in commonly known genes (i.e., <em>BRCA1</em>/<em>2</em>). Education on germline eligibility and reflex clinical protocols are needed to ensure patients receive germline GT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12853,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic oncology","volume":"199 ","pages":"Pages 51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825825008789","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Tumor next generation sequencing (NGS) may identify potential germline DNA mutations associated with cancer susceptibility. We describe the frequency of tumor NGS results in patients meeting ESMO 2019 recommendations for germline genetic testing (GT) and reasons for not undergoing germline GT.

Methods

A retrospective study (Sept. 2019-Feb. 2022) in a large, urban healthcare system identified patients meeting ESMO guidelines for potentially actionable germline mutations on NGS.

Results

Of 3470 patients who underwent tumor NGS, 326 (9.4 %) had at least one potential actionable germline mutation. Of eligible patients, 189 (58.0 %) did not receive germline GT. Reasons for not undergoing GT include: 127 (67.2 %), not referred for GT; 30 (15.9 %), referred but did not attend genetic counseling; 32 (16.9 %), declined, died before GT, had insufficient samples, lacked insurance or lost to follow-up. Among 127 patients not referred for germline GT (39.0 % of the total eligible cohort), the most common cancer types were lung (33.0 %), colorectal (9.4 %), and cancer of unknown primary (9.4 %). Overall, 64 (50.4 %) patients not referred for germline GT had mutations in BRCA1/2 and/or Lynch syndrome genes. Of 137 patients who underwent germline GT, 86 (62.8 %) had positive GT.

Conclusions

In this cohort, 60 % of the eligible population by ESMO criteria did not receive GT, most commonly due to lack of referral (over 2/3 of patients). Further, 50 % of patients not referred for GT had mutations in commonly known genes (i.e., BRCA1/2). Education on germline eligibility and reflex clinical protocols are needed to ensure patients receive germline GT.
错失的机会:肿瘤测序后的种系检测
目的肿瘤新一代测序(NGS)可识别与肿瘤易感性相关的潜在种系DNA突变。我们描述了符合ESMO 2019生殖系基因检测(GT)建议的患者肿瘤NGS结果的频率以及不进行生殖系基因检测的原因。2022)在一个大型城市医疗保健系统中确定了符合ESMO指南的患者,这些患者可能存在可操作的NGS种系突变。结果在3470例接受肿瘤NGS的患者中,326例(9.4%)至少有一种潜在的可操作的种系突变。在符合条件的患者中,189例(58.0%)未接受生殖系GT。未接受GT的原因包括:127例(67.2%)未转介GT;30例(15.9%)被转诊但未参加遗传咨询;32例(16.9%),下降,在GT前死亡,样本不足,缺乏保险或随访失败。在127名未接受生殖系GT的患者中(占总符合条件队列的39.0%),最常见的癌症类型是肺癌(33.0%)、结直肠癌(9.4%)和原发不明的癌症(9.4%)。总体而言,64例(50.4%)未接受生殖系GT的患者存在BRCA1/2和/或Lynch综合征基因突变。在137例接受生殖系GT的患者中,86例(62.8%)GT阳性。结论在该队列中,60%符合ESMO标准的人群未接受GT,最常见的原因是缺乏转诊(超过2/3的患者)。此外,50%未接受GT治疗的患者存在已知基因突变(即BRCA1/2)。需要对生殖系资格和反射性临床方案进行教育,以确保患者接受生殖系GT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gynecologic oncology
Gynecologic oncology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.40%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology, an international journal, is devoted to the publication of clinical and investigative articles that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract. Investigations relating to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of female cancers, as well as research from any of the disciplines related to this field of interest, are published. Research Areas Include: • Cell and molecular biology • Chemotherapy • Cytology • Endocrinology • Epidemiology • Genetics • Gynecologic surgery • Immunology • Pathology • Radiotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信