Guidelines for the testing and reporting of cytogenetic results for risk stratification of multiple myeloma: a report of the Cancer Genomics Consortium Plasma Cell Neoplasm Working Group

IF 12.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Xinyan Lu, Erica F. Andersen, Rahul Banerjee, Celeste C. Eno, Patrick R. Gonzales, Shaji Kumar, Angela M. Lager, Patricia M. Miron, Trevor Pugh, Fabiola Quintero-Rivera, Virginia C. Thurston, Daynna J. Wolff, Jian Zhao, Rafael Fonseca, Linda B. Baughn
{"title":"Guidelines for the testing and reporting of cytogenetic results for risk stratification of multiple myeloma: a report of the Cancer Genomics Consortium Plasma Cell Neoplasm Working Group","authors":"Xinyan Lu, Erica F. Andersen, Rahul Banerjee, Celeste C. Eno, Patrick R. Gonzales, Shaji Kumar, Angela M. Lager, Patricia M. Miron, Trevor Pugh, Fabiola Quintero-Rivera, Virginia C. Thurston, Daynna J. Wolff, Jian Zhao, Rafael Fonseca, Linda B. Baughn","doi":"10.1038/s41408-025-01286-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remains the gold-standard clinical assay to detect genetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma (MM). However, FISH panel design, use of conventional chromosome banding analysis and reporting practices have been reported to vary among laboratories. Therefore, standardization in FISH testing and reporting practices is needed to improve report clarity and avoid misinterpretation. The recommendations in this paper represent a consensus of our Cancer Genomics Consortium Plasma Cell Neoplasm Working Group, comprising a joint panel of cytogenetic laboratory directors and clinical investigators with expertise in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment of multiple myeloma. Prior to developing these consensus recommendations, we performed a full literature review and conducted a survey of 102 oncologists to assess current variations and challenges in MM cytogenetic/FISH testing and reporting. Our guidelines establish best practices for the optimization of FISH panel selection, and recommendations for standardized reporting of cytogenetic results to align with the 2025 International Myeloma Society (IMS)/International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Updated Risk Stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-025-01286-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remains the gold-standard clinical assay to detect genetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma (MM). However, FISH panel design, use of conventional chromosome banding analysis and reporting practices have been reported to vary among laboratories. Therefore, standardization in FISH testing and reporting practices is needed to improve report clarity and avoid misinterpretation. The recommendations in this paper represent a consensus of our Cancer Genomics Consortium Plasma Cell Neoplasm Working Group, comprising a joint panel of cytogenetic laboratory directors and clinical investigators with expertise in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment of multiple myeloma. Prior to developing these consensus recommendations, we performed a full literature review and conducted a survey of 102 oncologists to assess current variations and challenges in MM cytogenetic/FISH testing and reporting. Our guidelines establish best practices for the optimization of FISH panel selection, and recommendations for standardized reporting of cytogenetic results to align with the 2025 International Myeloma Society (IMS)/International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Updated Risk Stratification.

Abstract Image

多发性骨髓瘤风险分层的细胞遗传学检测和报告指南:癌症基因组学联盟浆细胞肿瘤工作组的报告
荧光原位杂交(FISH)仍然是检测多发性骨髓瘤(MM)遗传异常的金标准临床检测方法。然而,据报道,FISH小组设计,使用传统的染色体带分析和报告实践在实验室之间有所不同。因此,需要对FISH测试和报告实践进行标准化,以提高报告的清晰度并避免误解。本文中的建议代表了我们癌症基因组学联盟浆细胞肿瘤工作组的共识,该工作组由细胞遗传学实验室主任和具有多发性骨髓瘤诊断、风险分层和治疗专业知识的临床研究人员组成。在形成这些共识建议之前,我们进行了完整的文献综述,并对102名肿瘤学家进行了调查,以评估MM细胞遗传学/FISH检测和报告的当前变化和挑战。我们的指南建立了优化FISH小组选择的最佳实践,并建议细胞遗传学结果的标准化报告,以与2025年国际骨髓瘤协会(IMS)/国际骨髓瘤工作组(IMWG)更新的风险分层保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as: Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights Clinical trials and observations Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信