The clinical efficacy and safety of ERCP in traumatic pancreatic injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Hulusi Can Karpuzcu, Çağdaş Erdoğan
{"title":"The clinical efficacy and safety of ERCP in traumatic pancreatic injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Hulusi Can Karpuzcu, Çağdaş Erdoğan","doi":"10.1186/s13017-025-00631-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traumatic pancreatic injuries (TPI) are rare, critical complications increasingly managed by minimally invasive Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed ERCP’s efficacy and safety for TPI regarding pancreatic duct integrity and clinical outcomes in diverse populations. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched (2000–2024) for studies reporting on ERCP for TPI. Primary outcomes were pancreatic duct integrity and complications; secondary outcomes included mortality and hospital stay. Pediatric and adult populations were compared via subgroup analysis. Publication bias was assessed. Fifteen studies comprising 1,823 patients (54% male, 32% pediatric) were included in the meta-analysis. ERCP demonstrated a pooled clinical success rate of 89% (95% CI: 83–93%) and significantly improved pancreatic duct integrity (OR for pancreatic duct integrity: 9.17, 95% CI: 6.73–12.49). Complication rates ranged from 4 to 17%, with pancreatitis and bleeding being the most common adverse events. Mortality rates were low (3–5%), and ERCP significantly reduced hospital stay by an average of 3.1 days compared to surgical interventions. Pediatric patients had slightly lower success rates (OR: 6.73, 95% CI: 4.01–11.31) compared to adults (OR: 10.87, 95% CI: 7.40–15.98). ERCP is an effective and safe modality for managing TPI in both pediatric and adult patients, yielding high success rates in maintaining ductal integrity and reducing complications, although interpretation requires caution due to potential publication bias. Further prospective studies are required to optimize standardized protocols.","PeriodicalId":48867,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-025-00631-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traumatic pancreatic injuries (TPI) are rare, critical complications increasingly managed by minimally invasive Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed ERCP’s efficacy and safety for TPI regarding pancreatic duct integrity and clinical outcomes in diverse populations. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched (2000–2024) for studies reporting on ERCP for TPI. Primary outcomes were pancreatic duct integrity and complications; secondary outcomes included mortality and hospital stay. Pediatric and adult populations were compared via subgroup analysis. Publication bias was assessed. Fifteen studies comprising 1,823 patients (54% male, 32% pediatric) were included in the meta-analysis. ERCP demonstrated a pooled clinical success rate of 89% (95% CI: 83–93%) and significantly improved pancreatic duct integrity (OR for pancreatic duct integrity: 9.17, 95% CI: 6.73–12.49). Complication rates ranged from 4 to 17%, with pancreatitis and bleeding being the most common adverse events. Mortality rates were low (3–5%), and ERCP significantly reduced hospital stay by an average of 3.1 days compared to surgical interventions. Pediatric patients had slightly lower success rates (OR: 6.73, 95% CI: 4.01–11.31) compared to adults (OR: 10.87, 95% CI: 7.40–15.98). ERCP is an effective and safe modality for managing TPI in both pediatric and adult patients, yielding high success rates in maintaining ductal integrity and reducing complications, although interpretation requires caution due to potential publication bias. Further prospective studies are required to optimize standardized protocols.
ERCP治疗外伤性胰腺损伤的临床疗效和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
外伤性胰腺损伤(TPI)是罕见的,严重的并发症越来越多地通过微创内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)来治疗。我们系统地回顾和荟萃分析了ERCP治疗TPI的有效性和安全性,涉及不同人群的胰管完整性和临床结果。检索PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library和Web of Science(2000-2024)关于ERCP治疗TPI的研究报告。主要结局是胰管完整性和并发症;次要结局包括死亡率和住院时间。通过亚组分析比较儿科和成人人群。评估发表偏倚。15项研究包括1823例患者(54%男性,32%儿科)纳入meta分析。ERCP的总临床成功率为89% (95% CI: 83-93%),显著改善了胰管完整性(胰管完整性OR: 9.17, 95% CI: 6.73-12.49)。并发症发生率从4%到17%不等,胰腺炎和出血是最常见的不良事件。死亡率低(3-5%),与手术干预相比,ERCP显着减少了平均3.1天的住院时间。与成人(OR: 10.87, 95% CI: 7.40-15.98)相比,儿科患者的成功率略低(OR: 6.73, 95% CI: 4.01-11.31)。ERCP是治疗儿童和成人TPI的一种有效且安全的方式,在维持导管完整性和减少并发症方面具有很高的成功率,尽管由于潜在的发表偏倚,解释需要谨慎。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来优化标准化方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
World Journal of Emergency Surgery EMERGENCY MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Emergency Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal covering all facets of clinical and basic research in traumatic and non-traumatic emergency surgery and related fields. Topics include emergency surgery, acute care surgery, trauma surgery, intensive care, trauma management, and resuscitation, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信