The untranslatability of environmental affective scales: insights from indigenous soundscape perceptions in China.

IF 9.1 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
npj urban sustainability Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-14 DOI:10.1038/s42949-025-00228-6
Duotuo Wu, Rumei Han, Ruining Zhang, Xinhao Yang, Yuan Zhang, Jian Kang
{"title":"The untranslatability of environmental affective scales: insights from indigenous soundscape perceptions in China.","authors":"Duotuo Wu, Rumei Han, Ruining Zhang, Xinhao Yang, Yuan Zhang, Jian Kang","doi":"10.1038/s42949-025-00228-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soundscapes significantly impact human well-being, yet standard Western-based Soundscape Affective Quality (SAQ) scales may not accurately represent culturally specific perceptions. This study explored structural differences in soundscape emotional experiences between Chinese and Western cultures using an indigenous approach. An Indigenous Chinese SAQ (ICSAQ) scale was developed through perceptual evaluations of 132 representative Chinese soundscape excerpts by 264 participants from 30 provinces, employing 108 culturally relevant descriptors. Principal component analysis revealed two dimensions-Comfort and Richness-differing notably from the global Pleasantness-Eventfulness model. Comparison with the translated global SAQ scale showed significant measurement bias, with the imported scale overestimating positive emotions and activation levels. Regression analyses confirmed the ICSAQ scale's stronger interpretability regarding objective acoustic indicators. The findings highlight critical limitations of translation-based environmental affective measurements, emphasizing the necessity of culturally appropriate assessment tools for inclusive urban environmental management.</p>","PeriodicalId":74322,"journal":{"name":"npj urban sustainability","volume":"5 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12167170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj urban sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-025-00228-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soundscapes significantly impact human well-being, yet standard Western-based Soundscape Affective Quality (SAQ) scales may not accurately represent culturally specific perceptions. This study explored structural differences in soundscape emotional experiences between Chinese and Western cultures using an indigenous approach. An Indigenous Chinese SAQ (ICSAQ) scale was developed through perceptual evaluations of 132 representative Chinese soundscape excerpts by 264 participants from 30 provinces, employing 108 culturally relevant descriptors. Principal component analysis revealed two dimensions-Comfort and Richness-differing notably from the global Pleasantness-Eventfulness model. Comparison with the translated global SAQ scale showed significant measurement bias, with the imported scale overestimating positive emotions and activation levels. Regression analyses confirmed the ICSAQ scale's stronger interpretability regarding objective acoustic indicators. The findings highlight critical limitations of translation-based environmental affective measurements, emphasizing the necessity of culturally appropriate assessment tools for inclusive urban environmental management.

环境情感尺度的不可译性:来自中国本土音景感知的见解。
音景显著地影响着人类的幸福感,然而标准的基于西方的音景情感质量(SAQ)量表可能不能准确地代表特定文化的感知。本研究采用本土视角探讨了中西方文化在音景情感体验上的结构性差异。本研究采用108个文化相关描述词,对来自30个省份的264名被试的132个具有代表性的中国声景片段进行感知评价,并编制了一份中国本土声景质量量表。主成分分析揭示了两个维度——舒适度和丰富性——与全球愉悦-事件性模型明显不同。与翻译后的全球SAQ量表比较显示出显著的测量偏差,进口量表高估了积极情绪和激活水平。回归分析证实了ICSAQ量表在客观声学指标方面具有较强的可解释性。研究结果强调了基于翻译的环境情感测量的关键局限性,强调了文化上适当的评估工具对包容性城市环境管理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信