Patients Evaluated and Discharged From the Waiting Room Do Not Have a Higher Rate of 72-Hour Returns - A Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Cynthia M Gaudet, Bryan A Stenson, Peter S Antkowiak, Anne V Grossestreuer, Daniel L Shaw, David T Chiu
{"title":"Patients Evaluated and Discharged From the Waiting Room Do Not Have a Higher Rate of 72-Hour Returns - A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Cynthia M Gaudet, Bryan A Stenson, Peter S Antkowiak, Anne V Grossestreuer, Daniel L Shaw, David T Chiu","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the rate of return visits to the emergency department (ED) within 72 hours of discharge for patients evaluated in the waiting room. ED crowding challenges throughput, and we hypothesized that some patients may be suitable for the completion of evaluation without rooming.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective analysis of a tertiary hospital ED. The primary outcome was 72-hour returns following discharge from the ED, stratified by location of initial physician evaluation and discharge: waiting room only, waiting room followed by treatment space, and treatment space only. Categorical data were compared using a chi-squared test and continuous data using a one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. The primary outcome was analyzed using a chi-squared test adjusting for age, biologic sex, Emergency Severity Index, primary language, time of day, and day of the week using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant overall difference in return visits within 72 hours of discharge based on the ED location where the evaluation occurred (<i>P</i> < .05; 5.0% in the waiting room only, 4.4% in the waiting room followed by treatment space, and 4.9% in the treatment space only). However, when comparing groups individually, there was a significantly lower rate of 72-hour return only for patients seen in the waiting room followed by a treatment space compared with treatment space only (<i>P</i> = .032). The patients evaluated and discharged from the waiting room tended to be younger, more likely to be male, with lower acuity Emergency Severity Index scores, and typically seen during an evening shift compared with the patients who were evaluated in a treatment space during their visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant increase in the rate of return for those patients seen primarily in the waiting room or for those where the initial work up started in the waiting room compared with those who were placed in a treatment space prior to a physician evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"6 3","pages":"100155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12169235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the rate of return visits to the emergency department (ED) within 72 hours of discharge for patients evaluated in the waiting room. ED crowding challenges throughput, and we hypothesized that some patients may be suitable for the completion of evaluation without rooming.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of a tertiary hospital ED. The primary outcome was 72-hour returns following discharge from the ED, stratified by location of initial physician evaluation and discharge: waiting room only, waiting room followed by treatment space, and treatment space only. Categorical data were compared using a chi-squared test and continuous data using a one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. The primary outcome was analyzed using a chi-squared test adjusting for age, biologic sex, Emergency Severity Index, primary language, time of day, and day of the week using logistic regression.

Results: There was a statistically significant overall difference in return visits within 72 hours of discharge based on the ED location where the evaluation occurred (P < .05; 5.0% in the waiting room only, 4.4% in the waiting room followed by treatment space, and 4.9% in the treatment space only). However, when comparing groups individually, there was a significantly lower rate of 72-hour return only for patients seen in the waiting room followed by a treatment space compared with treatment space only (P = .032). The patients evaluated and discharged from the waiting room tended to be younger, more likely to be male, with lower acuity Emergency Severity Index scores, and typically seen during an evening shift compared with the patients who were evaluated in a treatment space during their visit.

Conclusion: There was no significant increase in the rate of return for those patients seen primarily in the waiting room or for those where the initial work up started in the waiting room compared with those who were placed in a treatment space prior to a physician evaluation.

经过评估并从候诊室出院的患者没有更高的72小时复诊率——一项回顾性观察研究。
目的:评估在候诊室接受评估的患者出院后72小时内的急诊复诊率。急诊科拥挤挑战吞吐量,我们假设一些患者可能适合在没有房间的情况下完成评估。方法:这是一项对三级医院急诊科的单中心回顾性分析。主要结果是急诊科出院后72小时的回访,按初次医生评估和出院的地点分层:只有候诊室,只有候诊室后有治疗空间,只有治疗空间。分类资料采用卡方检验比较,连续资料采用Bonferroni校正的单向方差分析比较。主要结局采用卡方检验进行分析,对年龄、生理性别、紧急程度指数、主要语言、一天中的时间和一周中的哪一天进行logistic回归校正。结果:根据评估发生的急诊地点,出院后72小时内复诊的总体差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05;5.0%只在候诊室,4.4%在候诊室,其次是治疗室,4.9%只在治疗室)。然而,当单独比较组时,仅在候诊室就诊的患者在72小时内返回治疗空间的比率明显低于仅在治疗空间就诊的患者(P = 0.032)。接受评估并从候诊室出院的患者往往更年轻,更有可能是男性,急症严重程度指数评分较低,与在就诊期间在治疗室接受评估的患者相比,他们通常在夜班期间就诊。结论:与那些在医生评估之前被安排在治疗空间的患者相比,那些主要在候诊室看到的患者或那些在候诊室开始初步工作的患者的回报率没有显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信