{"title":"Unpacking COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Network Analysis Perspective on Related Beliefs and Responses.","authors":"Evangelos Karademas, Antonia Paschali","doi":"10.1007/s12529-025-10378-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although SARS-CoV-2 vaccination effectively prevents severe infection, many people hesitate to get vaccinated. Psychological factors contributing to vaccination hesitancy include beliefs about vaccine safety and effectiveness, perceived severity of infection, mistrust in authorities, misinformation and conspiracy beliefs, and pandemic-related distress and coping. This cross-sectional study, conducted in Greece, explored the relationships between vaccination and pandemic-related beliefs and responses and examined whether these relationships differed between vaccinated individuals and those hesitating or unwilling to vaccinate.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was conducted one year after the coronavirus vaccine was available for the entire population and the Omicron variant started to spread. The sample included 520 participants (358 females; mean age = 38.33 years). Network analysis was used to map the connections between the variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings revealed that people less concerned about infection severity and less confident in vaccine effectiveness were more likely to avoid vaccination. Notably, the network structure differed significantly between the two groups. Vaccinated participants exhibited a dense network of interconnected beliefs and responses, with vaccine safety, trust in authorities, worry regarding the pandemic or infection, and a positive outlook playing central roles. In contrast, the hesitant group displayed fewer connections, with vaccine safety and effectiveness beliefs linked primarily to trust in authorities and misinformation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These differences suggest that vaccinated individuals process pandemic and vaccine-related information more comprehensively, while hesitancy may stem from limited integration of related beliefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54208,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-025-10378-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although SARS-CoV-2 vaccination effectively prevents severe infection, many people hesitate to get vaccinated. Psychological factors contributing to vaccination hesitancy include beliefs about vaccine safety and effectiveness, perceived severity of infection, mistrust in authorities, misinformation and conspiracy beliefs, and pandemic-related distress and coping. This cross-sectional study, conducted in Greece, explored the relationships between vaccination and pandemic-related beliefs and responses and examined whether these relationships differed between vaccinated individuals and those hesitating or unwilling to vaccinate.
Method: The study was conducted one year after the coronavirus vaccine was available for the entire population and the Omicron variant started to spread. The sample included 520 participants (358 females; mean age = 38.33 years). Network analysis was used to map the connections between the variables.
Results: Findings revealed that people less concerned about infection severity and less confident in vaccine effectiveness were more likely to avoid vaccination. Notably, the network structure differed significantly between the two groups. Vaccinated participants exhibited a dense network of interconnected beliefs and responses, with vaccine safety, trust in authorities, worry regarding the pandemic or infection, and a positive outlook playing central roles. In contrast, the hesitant group displayed fewer connections, with vaccine safety and effectiveness beliefs linked primarily to trust in authorities and misinformation.
Conclusions: These differences suggest that vaccinated individuals process pandemic and vaccine-related information more comprehensively, while hesitancy may stem from limited integration of related beliefs.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (IJBM) is the official scientific journal of the International Society for Behavioral Medicine (ISBM). IJBM seeks to present the best theoretically-driven, evidence-based work in the field of behavioral medicine from around the globe. IJBM embraces multiple theoretical perspectives, research methodologies, groups of interest, and levels of analysis. The journal is interested in research across the broad spectrum of behavioral medicine, including health-behavior relationships, the prevention of illness and the promotion of health, the effects of illness on the self and others, the effectiveness of novel interventions, identification of biobehavioral mechanisms, and the influence of social factors on health. We welcome experimental, non-experimental, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies as well as implementation and dissemination research, integrative reviews, and meta-analyses.