Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a Danish single center 10-year follow-up study.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Martin H Pedersen, Niels Christian Bjerregaard, Frederik Hvid-Jensen, Daniel W Kjaer
{"title":"Peroral endoscopic myotomy: a Danish single center 10-year follow-up study.","authors":"Martin H Pedersen, Niels Christian Bjerregaard, Frederik Hvid-Jensen, Daniel W Kjaer","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11832-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder that in many cases can be treated effectively with Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). However, long-term outcomes regarding clinical efficacy, patient satisfaction, and the prevalence of post-POEM gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains elusive and thus require further investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study followed 63 patients treated for achalasia with POEM. Clinical success (Eckardt-score ≤ 3, and no subsequent treatments), GERD prevalence (GerdQ-score ≥ 8), and patient satisfaction were assessed via medical record reviews and telephone interviews. Statistical analyses identified risk factors for treatment failure, lower levels of satisfaction, and GERD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 10 years, clinical success was 74%. The average Eckardt-score improved from 7,6 pre-POEM to 2,16 (p < 0.0001). The majority of treatment failures occurred within three months post-POEM, with no new failures after 5 years. GERD symptoms were reported by 33% of patients. Patient satisfaction was high with 91% reporting to be satisfied or very satisfied. Treatment-naïve patients had higher success rates (85%) compared to those with prior Heller's myotomy (40%, p < 0.0001). No other risk factors for clinical failure were found. RePOEM showed superior outcomes for salvage treatment compared to balloon dilation, botulinum toxin injections, and Heller's myotomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POEM has a good and lasting efficacy at a median follow-up of 10 years. Clinical failure was not observed beyond 5 years post-POEM. The majority of patients were satisfied with POEM at follow-up. Symptomatic GERD was a highly experienced side effect at follow-up, however, not associated with lower levels of satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11832-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder that in many cases can be treated effectively with Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). However, long-term outcomes regarding clinical efficacy, patient satisfaction, and the prevalence of post-POEM gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains elusive and thus require further investigation.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study followed 63 patients treated for achalasia with POEM. Clinical success (Eckardt-score ≤ 3, and no subsequent treatments), GERD prevalence (GerdQ-score ≥ 8), and patient satisfaction were assessed via medical record reviews and telephone interviews. Statistical analyses identified risk factors for treatment failure, lower levels of satisfaction, and GERD.

Results: At a median follow-up of 10 years, clinical success was 74%. The average Eckardt-score improved from 7,6 pre-POEM to 2,16 (p < 0.0001). The majority of treatment failures occurred within three months post-POEM, with no new failures after 5 years. GERD symptoms were reported by 33% of patients. Patient satisfaction was high with 91% reporting to be satisfied or very satisfied. Treatment-naïve patients had higher success rates (85%) compared to those with prior Heller's myotomy (40%, p < 0.0001). No other risk factors for clinical failure were found. RePOEM showed superior outcomes for salvage treatment compared to balloon dilation, botulinum toxin injections, and Heller's myotomy.

Conclusion: POEM has a good and lasting efficacy at a median follow-up of 10 years. Clinical failure was not observed beyond 5 years post-POEM. The majority of patients were satisfied with POEM at follow-up. Symptomatic GERD was a highly experienced side effect at follow-up, however, not associated with lower levels of satisfaction.

经口内窥镜下肌切开术:丹麦单中心10年随访研究。
摘要贲门失弛缓症是一种罕见的食管运动障碍,在许多情况下可以通过经口内窥镜肌切开术(POEM)有效治疗。然而,关于临床疗效、患者满意度和poem后胃食管反流病(GERD)患病率的长期结果仍然难以捉摸,因此需要进一步研究。方法:对63例经POEM治疗的贲门失弛缓症患者进行回顾性队列研究。临床成功(eckardt评分≤3分,无后续治疗)、GERD患病率(gerdq评分≥8分)和患者满意度通过病历回顾和电话访谈进行评估。统计分析确定了治疗失败、满意度较低和胃食管反流的危险因素。结果:中位随访10年,临床成功率为74%。平均eckardt评分从POEM前的7,6分提高到2,16分(p)。结论:POEM在中位随访10年期间具有良好且持久的疗效。术后5年未见临床失败。随访时,大多数患者对POEM满意。然而,在随访中,症状性胃食管反流是一个非常常见的副作用,与较低的满意度水平无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信