{"title":"Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Repair of Primary Lumbar Hernia Using Self-Gripping Mesh.","authors":"Huadong Du, Yingmo Shen, Huiqi Yang, Yilin Zhu","doi":"10.1177/15533506251348535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic repair of primary lumbar hernia using Self-Gripping mesh.MethodsThis retrospective study included 11 patients with primary lumbar hernias who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic repair with Self-Gripping mesh from May 2020 to October 2023 in our hospital. Observation indicators were intraoperative measured diameter of hernia ring defect, operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative follow-up, complications, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, chronic pain.ResultsThe operations were completed successfully in 11 cases. The mean diameter of hernia ring was 2.57 ± 0.49 cm (ranged from 2.0 to 3.0 cm), the mean operation time was 53.31 ± 19.33 min (ranged from 35 to 90 min), the intraoperative blood loss was 3.01 ± 1.43 mL (ranged from 2 to 10 mL), and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.43 ± 1.41 days (ranged from 1 to 4 days). The mean postoperative VAS scores at 24 h were 1.10 ± 0.32 (ranged from 1 to 2). All cases were followed up for 21.05 ± 16.73 months (ranged from 3 to 42 months) without seroma, hematoma, incision or mesh infection, recurrence and obvious chronic pain.ConclusionRetroperitoneal laparoscopic repair of primary lumbar hernia using Self-Gripping mesh is safe and feasible. Its efficacy in the short term is favorable.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"428-434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251348535","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic repair of primary lumbar hernia using Self-Gripping mesh.MethodsThis retrospective study included 11 patients with primary lumbar hernias who underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic repair with Self-Gripping mesh from May 2020 to October 2023 in our hospital. Observation indicators were intraoperative measured diameter of hernia ring defect, operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative follow-up, complications, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, chronic pain.ResultsThe operations were completed successfully in 11 cases. The mean diameter of hernia ring was 2.57 ± 0.49 cm (ranged from 2.0 to 3.0 cm), the mean operation time was 53.31 ± 19.33 min (ranged from 35 to 90 min), the intraoperative blood loss was 3.01 ± 1.43 mL (ranged from 2 to 10 mL), and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.43 ± 1.41 days (ranged from 1 to 4 days). The mean postoperative VAS scores at 24 h were 1.10 ± 0.32 (ranged from 1 to 2). All cases were followed up for 21.05 ± 16.73 months (ranged from 3 to 42 months) without seroma, hematoma, incision or mesh infection, recurrence and obvious chronic pain.ConclusionRetroperitoneal laparoscopic repair of primary lumbar hernia using Self-Gripping mesh is safe and feasible. Its efficacy in the short term is favorable.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).