Inequalities in Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy in Australia by Educational Attainment.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sheridan E Rodda, Melanie Lloyd, Jennifer Welsh, Jedidiah Morton, Rosemary Korda, Zanfina Ademi
{"title":"Inequalities in Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy in Australia by Educational Attainment.","authors":"Sheridan E Rodda, Melanie Lloyd, Jennifer Welsh, Jedidiah Morton, Rosemary Korda, Zanfina Ademi","doi":"10.1007/s40273-025-01517-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Summary measures such as quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) are increasingly used to monitor health inequalities. Socioeconomic inequalities in health are well documented in Australia, including inequalities by education. However, estimates for QALE by level of education are lacking for Australia. We aimed to provide QALE stratified by age and sex across levels of educational attainment for the Australian population aged 25 years and above.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We categorized educational attainment as low (completed year 11 or below), intermediate (completed year 12 and/or other non-tertiary or vocational qualification) or high (completed a bachelor's degree or above). Mean Short-Form Six-Dimension health utility was estimated for sex- and education-specific subgroups from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey (2022). We constructed life tables using age-sex-education-specific mortality rates for 2019 obtained from linked 2016 Census and Death Registrations data. Health utility was incorporated into the life tables to derive age- and sex-specific QALE across education levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At age 25 years, males with high education had 7.3 years greater life expectancy than those with low education (61.0 versus 53.7 years undiscounted) and larger QALE (39.9 versus 28.8 years undiscounted), a gap of 11.1 years (39% relative difference). Females aged 25 years with a high level of education experienced 3.9 years greater life expectancy (LE; 63.1 versus 59.2 years, undiscounted) and an additional 7.6 years of QALE (36.9 versus 29.3 years, undiscounted), compared with those with low education, a 26% relative difference in QALE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant disparities in QALE by educational attainment exist in Australia. These findings can inform policies aimed at reducing health inequity by guiding resource allocation and supporting future equity-informative economic evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19807,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01517-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Summary measures such as quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) are increasingly used to monitor health inequalities. Socioeconomic inequalities in health are well documented in Australia, including inequalities by education. However, estimates for QALE by level of education are lacking for Australia. We aimed to provide QALE stratified by age and sex across levels of educational attainment for the Australian population aged 25 years and above.

Methods: We categorized educational attainment as low (completed year 11 or below), intermediate (completed year 12 and/or other non-tertiary or vocational qualification) or high (completed a bachelor's degree or above). Mean Short-Form Six-Dimension health utility was estimated for sex- and education-specific subgroups from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey (2022). We constructed life tables using age-sex-education-specific mortality rates for 2019 obtained from linked 2016 Census and Death Registrations data. Health utility was incorporated into the life tables to derive age- and sex-specific QALE across education levels.

Results: At age 25 years, males with high education had 7.3 years greater life expectancy than those with low education (61.0 versus 53.7 years undiscounted) and larger QALE (39.9 versus 28.8 years undiscounted), a gap of 11.1 years (39% relative difference). Females aged 25 years with a high level of education experienced 3.9 years greater life expectancy (LE; 63.1 versus 59.2 years, undiscounted) and an additional 7.6 years of QALE (36.9 versus 29.3 years, undiscounted), compared with those with low education, a 26% relative difference in QALE.

Conclusions: Significant disparities in QALE by educational attainment exist in Australia. These findings can inform policies aimed at reducing health inequity by guiding resource allocation and supporting future equity-informative economic evaluations.

澳大利亚受教育程度对质量调整预期寿命的影响。
导言:质量调整预期寿命(QALE)等简要措施越来越多地用于监测健康不平等现象。在澳大利亚,卫生方面的社会经济不平等,包括教育方面的不平等,都有充分的记录。然而,澳大利亚缺乏按教育水平对QALE的估计。我们的目的是为25岁及以上的澳大利亚人口提供按年龄和性别分层的教育程度的QALE。方法:我们将受教育程度分为低(完成11年级或以下)、中等(完成12年级和/或其他非高等教育或职业资格)和高(完成学士学位或以上)。根据澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态调查(2022年),估计了性别和教育特定亚组的平均短格式六维度健康效用。我们使用从相关的2016年人口普查和死亡登记数据中获得的2019年特定年龄性教育死亡率构建了生命表。将健康效用纳入生命表,以得出不同教育水平的年龄和性别的QALE。结果:在25岁时,高学历男性的预期寿命比低学历男性多7.3岁(61.0岁对53.7岁,未折现),QALE更大(39.9岁对28.8岁,未折现),差距为11.1岁(相对差异39%)。25岁受教育程度高的女性的预期寿命增加3.9年(LE;63.1年对59.2年,未打折)和额外7.6年的QALE(36.9年对29.3年,未打折),与受教育程度低的人相比,QALE的相对差异为26%。结论:澳大利亚受教育程度对QALE的影响存在显著差异。这些发现可以为旨在通过指导资源分配和支持未来公平信息经济评估来减少卫生不平等的政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PharmacoEconomics
PharmacoEconomics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics is the benchmark journal for peer-reviewed, authoritative and practical articles on the application of pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life assessment to optimum drug therapy and health outcomes. An invaluable source of applied pharmacoeconomic original research and educational material for the healthcare decision maker. PharmacoEconomics is dedicated to the clear communication of complex pharmacoeconomic issues related to patient care and drug utilization. PharmacoEconomics offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信