Real-World Analysis of Healthcare Utilization, Treatment Patterns, and Economic Burden in Medicare Beneficiaries with Parkinson's Disease: Implications by Levodopa Formulation and Disease Severity.

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS
Renée J G Arnold, Winona Tse, Kimberly Martin, Renee Kuan
{"title":"Real-World Analysis of Healthcare Utilization, Treatment Patterns, and Economic Burden in Medicare Beneficiaries with Parkinson's Disease: Implications by Levodopa Formulation and Disease Severity.","authors":"Renée J G Arnold, Winona Tse, Kimberly Martin, Renee Kuan","doi":"10.1007/s41669-025-00588-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate healthcare utilization, costs, and treatment patterns of Medicare beneficiaries with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with different carbidopa-levodopa regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using 100% fee-for-service Medicare research identifiable claims data from 2017 to 2019. The study population included 201,241 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65-90 years with PD who received at least one prescription for a carbidopa-levodopa-containing regimen. Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were analyzed, stratified by medication regimen containing levodopa and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), the latter as a proxy for disease severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immediate release (IR) carbidopa-levodopa was the most common initial prescription (83%). Extended release (ER) formulations had the highest mean daily dose (1140 mg, although the equivalent dose in a non-ER formulation is approximately 570 mg, in line with the other three primary regimens). Treatment persistence and cost generally increased with higher LEDD. Concomitant medication use, particularly dopamine agonists, also increased with higher LEDD. Total 3-year per patient healthcare costs were lower for patients prescribed controlled release (CR) carbidopa-levodopa (US $98,650); compared with US $116,394 for patients prescribed IR carbidopa-levodopa; US $123,650 for those prescribed CR + IR carbidopa-levodopa; and US $125,802 for ER carbidopa-levodopa. Costs tended to increase with higher LEDD, primarily driven by outpatient care and medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides comprehensive real-world evidence on carbidopa-levodopa use in Medicare beneficiaries with PD. Findings highlight the need for individualized treatment approaches, considering both symptom control and healthcare costs. Future research should focus on prospective studies to assess long-term outcomes and economic impact of different treatment strategies in PD, considering disease severity and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-025-00588-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate healthcare utilization, costs, and treatment patterns of Medicare beneficiaries with Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with different carbidopa-levodopa regimens.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using 100% fee-for-service Medicare research identifiable claims data from 2017 to 2019. The study population included 201,241 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65-90 years with PD who received at least one prescription for a carbidopa-levodopa-containing regimen. Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were analyzed, stratified by medication regimen containing levodopa and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), the latter as a proxy for disease severity.

Results: Immediate release (IR) carbidopa-levodopa was the most common initial prescription (83%). Extended release (ER) formulations had the highest mean daily dose (1140 mg, although the equivalent dose in a non-ER formulation is approximately 570 mg, in line with the other three primary regimens). Treatment persistence and cost generally increased with higher LEDD. Concomitant medication use, particularly dopamine agonists, also increased with higher LEDD. Total 3-year per patient healthcare costs were lower for patients prescribed controlled release (CR) carbidopa-levodopa (US $98,650); compared with US $116,394 for patients prescribed IR carbidopa-levodopa; US $123,650 for those prescribed CR + IR carbidopa-levodopa; and US $125,802 for ER carbidopa-levodopa. Costs tended to increase with higher LEDD, primarily driven by outpatient care and medications.

Conclusions: This study provides comprehensive real-world evidence on carbidopa-levodopa use in Medicare beneficiaries with PD. Findings highlight the need for individualized treatment approaches, considering both symptom control and healthcare costs. Future research should focus on prospective studies to assess long-term outcomes and economic impact of different treatment strategies in PD, considering disease severity and quality of life.

帕金森病患者医疗保险受益人的医疗保健利用、治疗模式和经济负担的现实世界分析:左旋多巴制剂和疾病严重程度的影响
目的:本研究旨在评估不同卡比多巴-左旋多巴方案治疗帕金森病(PD)的医疗保健利用、成本和治疗模式。方法:采用2017年至2019年100%按服务收费的医疗保险研究可识别索赔数据进行回顾性队列研究。研究人群包括201,241名年龄在65-90岁的PD患者,他们接受了至少一个含卡比多巴-左旋多巴方案的处方。根据左旋多巴和左旋多巴当量日剂量(LEDD)的用药方案对治疗模式、医疗资源利用和成本进行了分析,LEDD是疾病严重程度的代表。结果:卡比多巴-左旋多巴是最常见的初始处方(83%)。缓释制剂的平均日剂量最高(1140毫克,尽管非缓释制剂的等效剂量约为570毫克,与其他三种主要方案一致)。治疗持续时间和费用通常随着led的增加而增加。伴随用药,尤其是多巴胺激动剂,也随着LEDD的升高而增加。处方控释(CR)卡比多巴-左旋多巴患者的每名患者3年总医疗保健费用较低(98,650美元);相比之下,服用IR卡比多巴-左旋多巴的患者花费为116,394美元;处方CR + IR卡比多巴-左旋多巴的费用为123,650美元;ER卡比多巴-左旋多巴的费用为125,802美元。成本往往随着较高的led而增加,主要是由门诊护理和药物驱动的。结论:本研究为PD患者使用卡比多巴-左旋多巴提供了全面的现实证据。研究结果强调了个性化治疗方法的必要性,同时考虑到症状控制和医疗费用。未来的研究应侧重于前瞻性研究,以评估PD不同治疗策略的长期结果和经济影响,同时考虑疾病严重程度和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信