Proof of concept of an Automated Battlefield Trauma System for large-scale combat operations.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jay B Baker, John Blumhorst, Simon J Strating, Heather Holub, Matthew Perry, Mason H Remondelli, Ryan Leone, Stacy A Shackelford, Jennifer M Gurney
{"title":"Proof of concept of an Automated Battlefield Trauma System for large-scale combat operations.","authors":"Jay B Baker, John Blumhorst, Simon J Strating, Heather Holub, Matthew Perry, Mason H Remondelli, Ryan Leone, Stacy A Shackelford, Jennifer M Gurney","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large-scale combat operations (LSCO) generate high casualty volumes, challenging battlefield trauma care and necessitating a synchronized approach that integrates medical operations with warfighting functions. Existing casualty management tools, such as the Medical Planners Toolkit and Joint Medical Planning Tool, provide static estimates and lack predictive capabilities for evacuation and medical resupply. The Automated Battlefield Trauma System (ABTS) was developed to address these limitations by automating casualty categorization, resource estimation, and Medical Common Operating Picture reporting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tested during the US Army I Corps' Warfighter Exercise (WFX) 25-02, ABTS used casualty data derived from the Russo-Ukrainian conflict to estimate critical resource needs for medical units across different echelons. Integrated with Warfighter Simulation data, ABTS provided automated dashboards to track casualty categories, estimate died-of-wounds rates, and predict resource shortages. Initially relying on Excel-based dashboards, late-stage integration with Palantir's Maven Smart Systems enabled enhanced real-time data visualization and decision support for commanders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key takeaways from the proof of concept include the following: (1) automation significantly improves casualty care management in LSCO; (2) ABTS enhances predictive logistics for evacuation and medical resupply; (3) it serves as a critical risk management tool for commanders; and (4) integration with warfighting functions is essential for operational effectiveness. While successful, future iterations must refine casualty modeling, enhance data integration with emerging artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities, and expand interoperability with Joint and allied forces.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Automated Battlefield Trauma System demonstrated its potential to transform battlefield casualty management by leveraging automation and predictive analytics. Continued development will refine its capabilities, improve real-time data integration, and ensure its applicability across military operations, enhancing survivability and operational efficiency in LSCO environments.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Proof of Concept; Level V.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Large-scale combat operations (LSCO) generate high casualty volumes, challenging battlefield trauma care and necessitating a synchronized approach that integrates medical operations with warfighting functions. Existing casualty management tools, such as the Medical Planners Toolkit and Joint Medical Planning Tool, provide static estimates and lack predictive capabilities for evacuation and medical resupply. The Automated Battlefield Trauma System (ABTS) was developed to address these limitations by automating casualty categorization, resource estimation, and Medical Common Operating Picture reporting.

Methods: Tested during the US Army I Corps' Warfighter Exercise (WFX) 25-02, ABTS used casualty data derived from the Russo-Ukrainian conflict to estimate critical resource needs for medical units across different echelons. Integrated with Warfighter Simulation data, ABTS provided automated dashboards to track casualty categories, estimate died-of-wounds rates, and predict resource shortages. Initially relying on Excel-based dashboards, late-stage integration with Palantir's Maven Smart Systems enabled enhanced real-time data visualization and decision support for commanders.

Results: Key takeaways from the proof of concept include the following: (1) automation significantly improves casualty care management in LSCO; (2) ABTS enhances predictive logistics for evacuation and medical resupply; (3) it serves as a critical risk management tool for commanders; and (4) integration with warfighting functions is essential for operational effectiveness. While successful, future iterations must refine casualty modeling, enhance data integration with emerging artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities, and expand interoperability with Joint and allied forces.

Conclusion: The Automated Battlefield Trauma System demonstrated its potential to transform battlefield casualty management by leveraging automation and predictive analytics. Continued development will refine its capabilities, improve real-time data integration, and ensure its applicability across military operations, enhancing survivability and operational efficiency in LSCO environments.

Level of evidence: Proof of Concept; Level V.

用于大规模作战行动的自动化战场创伤系统的概念验证。
背景:大规模作战行动(LSCO)造成高伤亡,挑战战场创伤护理,需要一种将医疗行动与作战功能相结合的同步方法。现有的伤亡管理工具,如医疗规划人员工具包和联合医疗规划工具,提供的是静态估计,缺乏后送和医疗再补给的预测能力。自动化战场创伤系统(ABTS)通过自动化伤亡分类、资源评估和医疗通用操作图像报告来解决这些限制。方法:ABTS在美国陆军第1军团的作战人员演习(WFX) 25-02期间进行了测试,使用来自俄罗斯-乌克兰冲突的伤亡数据来估计不同梯队医疗单位的关键资源需求。与作战人员模拟数据相结合,ABTS提供自动化仪表板来跟踪伤亡类别,估计伤亡率,并预测资源短缺。最初依赖于基于excel的仪表板,后期与Palantir的Maven智能系统集成,增强了实时数据可视化和指挥官的决策支持。结果:概念验证的关键结论包括:(1)自动化显著改善了LSCO的伤亡护理管理;(2) ABTS增强了后送和医疗补给的预测性后勤;(3)作为指挥员的关键风险管理工具;(4)与作战功能的集成对作战效能至关重要。虽然取得了成功,但未来的迭代必须改进伤亡建模,增强与新兴人工智能和机器学习能力的数据集成,并扩大与联合和盟军的互操作性。结论:自动化战场创伤系统展示了其利用自动化和预测分析改变战场伤亡管理的潜力。继续发展将完善其能力,改进实时数据集成,并确保其在军事行动中的适用性,增强LSCO环境中的生存能力和作战效率。证据水平:概念证明;水平V。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信