Establishing a System for Medical Certification of Cause of Death for Noninstitutional Deaths in a Selected Area of Kolar District, Karnataka, India: Protocol for a Population-Based Feasibility and Validation Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Madhusudan Muralidhar, Sukanya Rangamani, Vaitheeswaran Kulothungan, Priyanka Das, Monesh B Vishwakarma, Prashant Mathur
{"title":"Establishing a System for Medical Certification of Cause of Death for Noninstitutional Deaths in a Selected Area of Kolar District, Karnataka, India: Protocol for a Population-Based Feasibility and Validation Study.","authors":"Madhusudan Muralidhar, Sukanya Rangamani, Vaitheeswaran Kulothungan, Priyanka Das, Monesh B Vishwakarma, Prashant Mathur","doi":"10.2196/72330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical Certification of Cause of Death (MCCD) coverage in India is only 22.5%, largely due to a significant proportion of deaths occurring outside hospitals (noninstitutional deaths). The cause of death (CoD) in such cases is unlikely to be certified by any doctor. This study attempts to address this gap by developing an MCCD system for noninstitutional deaths in India.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study will assess the feasibility of a physician-derived cause of death (PhyCoD) approach for deducing CoD in noninstitutional deaths in a selected area of Kolar Taluk, Karnataka, and validate this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based feasibility and validation study will be conducted in 4 selected hospitals and 2 Primary Health Centre (PHC) areas in Kolar taluk, Kolar district, Karnataka, India. We developed 4 PhyCoD questionnaires: maternal, neonatal, child, and adult. Institutional deaths that occurred over the previous 10 months in these selected hospitals with detailed case records available were selected as \"gold standard\" cases. Trained investigators abstracted the history from these case records into the questionnaires and deduced the CoD sequence of events. The investigators then elicited the history from the deceased's relatives using the PhyCoD questionnaire and deduced the CoD sequence of events. This will be compared with the gold standard CoD sequence of events deduced from medical records. The extent of agreement will be measured. The tool will be revised based on the pilot phase experiences. For all brought dead cases to the 4 hospitals and home deaths in the 2 PHC areas over a 3-month period, doctors in these hospitals and PHC medical officers, respectively, will elicit the history from the deceased's kin using the PhyCoD questionnaires and arrive at a CoD sequence of events. This CoD sequence of events will be validated against the gold standard autopsy whenever possible (in brought dead cases). The PhyCoD approach will also be tested for inter-rater reliability by independent investigators on a random sample of noninstitutional deaths.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Institutional ethics committee clearance (January 2024), recruitment and training of project staff (January 2024-January 2025), preparation of questionnaires and application (August 2024-February 2025), pilot phase data collection (48 cases; August 2024-December 2024), and training of the doctors in the participating hospitals and PHC medical officers (December 2024) are complete. A total of 48 cases (32 adult, 7 child, 3 maternal, and 6 neonatal) were included in the pilot phase. Data review and analysis of the pilot phase data are underway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study is expected to provide information about the validity and feasibility of the PhyCoD approach. Depending on the study's outcomes, the tool may be adopted by more states, leading to increased coverage of noninstitutional deaths under MCCD, improved accuracy, and reduced delay of CoD reporting for noninstitutional deaths.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/72330.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":" ","pages":"e72330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12402730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/72330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical Certification of Cause of Death (MCCD) coverage in India is only 22.5%, largely due to a significant proportion of deaths occurring outside hospitals (noninstitutional deaths). The cause of death (CoD) in such cases is unlikely to be certified by any doctor. This study attempts to address this gap by developing an MCCD system for noninstitutional deaths in India.

Objective: This study will assess the feasibility of a physician-derived cause of death (PhyCoD) approach for deducing CoD in noninstitutional deaths in a selected area of Kolar Taluk, Karnataka, and validate this approach.

Methods: This population-based feasibility and validation study will be conducted in 4 selected hospitals and 2 Primary Health Centre (PHC) areas in Kolar taluk, Kolar district, Karnataka, India. We developed 4 PhyCoD questionnaires: maternal, neonatal, child, and adult. Institutional deaths that occurred over the previous 10 months in these selected hospitals with detailed case records available were selected as "gold standard" cases. Trained investigators abstracted the history from these case records into the questionnaires and deduced the CoD sequence of events. The investigators then elicited the history from the deceased's relatives using the PhyCoD questionnaire and deduced the CoD sequence of events. This will be compared with the gold standard CoD sequence of events deduced from medical records. The extent of agreement will be measured. The tool will be revised based on the pilot phase experiences. For all brought dead cases to the 4 hospitals and home deaths in the 2 PHC areas over a 3-month period, doctors in these hospitals and PHC medical officers, respectively, will elicit the history from the deceased's kin using the PhyCoD questionnaires and arrive at a CoD sequence of events. This CoD sequence of events will be validated against the gold standard autopsy whenever possible (in brought dead cases). The PhyCoD approach will also be tested for inter-rater reliability by independent investigators on a random sample of noninstitutional deaths.

Results: Institutional ethics committee clearance (January 2024), recruitment and training of project staff (January 2024-January 2025), preparation of questionnaires and application (August 2024-February 2025), pilot phase data collection (48 cases; August 2024-December 2024), and training of the doctors in the participating hospitals and PHC medical officers (December 2024) are complete. A total of 48 cases (32 adult, 7 child, 3 maternal, and 6 neonatal) were included in the pilot phase. Data review and analysis of the pilot phase data are underway.

Conclusions: The study is expected to provide information about the validity and feasibility of the PhyCoD approach. Depending on the study's outcomes, the tool may be adopted by more states, leading to increased coverage of noninstitutional deaths under MCCD, improved accuracy, and reduced delay of CoD reporting for noninstitutional deaths.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/72330.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在印度卡纳塔克邦Kolar区选定地区建立非机构死亡医学死因证明系统:基于人口的可行性和验证研究议定书。
背景:目前印度死因医学证明(MCCD)的覆盖率仅为22.5%。这主要是由于很大比例的死亡发生在医院以外(非机构死亡)。这种情况下的死因不太可能得到任何医生的证明。本研究试图通过在该国建立一个非机构死亡的MCCD系统来解决这一差距。目的:在卡纳塔克邦Kolar Taluk选定地区,评估医生推断死亡原因(PhyCoD)方法在推断非机构死亡病例中的可行性,并验证该方法的有效性。方法:这将是一项基于人群的可行性和有效性研究,将在印度卡纳塔克邦Kolar Taluk选定的4家医院和2个初级保健区进行。对孕妇、新生儿、儿童和成人进行了问卷调查。过去10个月内在这些有详细病例记录的选定医院发生的机构死亡病例被选为“金标准”病例。训练有素的调查人员从这些病例的病例记录中提取病史到问卷中,并推断出事件的死亡顺序。然后,研究人员使用生理CoD问卷从死者亲属那里获得病史,并推断出事件的CoD顺序。这将与从医疗记录中推断出的“黄金标准”死亡事件序列进行比较。达成一致的程度将被衡量。该工具将根据试点阶段的经验进行修订。4所医院的医生和2个初级保健地区的医务人员将分别利用生理死亡问卷从死者亲属处询问病史,得出生理死亡事件的顺序。通过这种方法推断出的死亡事件顺序将在可能的情况下(在带来的死亡病例中)根据“金标准”尸检进行验证。该方法还将在家庭死亡的评估者之间进行可靠性测试。结果:完成了IEC审批(2024年1月)、项目人员招聘及培训(2024年1月- 2025年1月)、问卷编制及申请(2024年8月- 2025年2月)、试点阶段数据收集(48例)(2024年8月- 12月)、参与医院医生及PHC MOs培训(2024年12月)。试验阶段共纳入48例病例(32例成人、7例儿童、3例产妇和6例新生儿)。试点阶段数据的数据审查和分析正在进行中。结论:本研究有望为PhyCoD方法的有效性和可行性提供信息。根据研究结果,该工具可能会被更多的州采用,从而增加MCCD下非机构死亡的覆盖范围,提高准确性并减少非机构死亡原因报告的延迟。临床试验:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信