Actions for stakeholders to develop better real-world evidence for HTA bodies/payers decision making.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ashley A Jaksa, Alina N Pavel, Matti Aapro, Niklas Hedberg, Victoria Hodgkinson, Laurie J Lambert, Francois Meyer, Matias Olsen, Piia K Rannanheimo, Karen M Facey
{"title":"Actions for stakeholders to develop better real-world evidence for HTA bodies/payers decision making.","authors":"Ashley A Jaksa, Alina N Pavel, Matti Aapro, Niklas Hedberg, Victoria Hodgkinson, Laurie J Lambert, Francois Meyer, Matias Olsen, Piia K Rannanheimo, Karen M Facey","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325100238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In 2020, RWE4Decisions, a multi-stakeholder initiative commissioned by the Belgian payer, published stakeholder actions to support the generation, analysis, and interpretation of real-world evidence (RWE) to inform the decision making of health technology assessment (HTA) bodies/payers for highly innovative medicines in the European Union (EU). Since 2020, changes in the decision-making environment and advancements in RWE have created an impetus to update stakeholder actions for the EU and Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RWE4Decisions' experts led focus groups with individual stakeholder groups (HTA bodies/payers, pharmaceutical industry, clinicians, patients, registry holders, and data analytical experts). Each focus group crafted new actions for their stakeholder, then the actions were discussed and revised in a multi-stakeholder meeting, a public webinar, and a public consultation. Themes across actions and meetings were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Detailed new actions for each stakeholder group are presented. Key themes identified are the need to address interorganizational fragmentation regarding secondary data use and methodologies to build robust RWE. HTA bodies/payers need to develop a common vision about the potential use of RWE. The role of the whole clinical team as primary data collectors is critical. Opportunities for scientific advice across the life cycle of a medicine are essential, and the implementation of RWE guidance related to HTA is paramount. Progress requires specific, operational actions and a collective effort by a variety of stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carrying out these actions will facilitate the development of methodological best practices for generating RWE to inform HTA of highly innovative medicines and build trust between stakeholders in the use of RWE.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12350084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325100238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In 2020, RWE4Decisions, a multi-stakeholder initiative commissioned by the Belgian payer, published stakeholder actions to support the generation, analysis, and interpretation of real-world evidence (RWE) to inform the decision making of health technology assessment (HTA) bodies/payers for highly innovative medicines in the European Union (EU). Since 2020, changes in the decision-making environment and advancements in RWE have created an impetus to update stakeholder actions for the EU and Canada.

Methods: RWE4Decisions' experts led focus groups with individual stakeholder groups (HTA bodies/payers, pharmaceutical industry, clinicians, patients, registry holders, and data analytical experts). Each focus group crafted new actions for their stakeholder, then the actions were discussed and revised in a multi-stakeholder meeting, a public webinar, and a public consultation. Themes across actions and meetings were identified.

Results: Detailed new actions for each stakeholder group are presented. Key themes identified are the need to address interorganizational fragmentation regarding secondary data use and methodologies to build robust RWE. HTA bodies/payers need to develop a common vision about the potential use of RWE. The role of the whole clinical team as primary data collectors is critical. Opportunities for scientific advice across the life cycle of a medicine are essential, and the implementation of RWE guidance related to HTA is paramount. Progress requires specific, operational actions and a collective effort by a variety of stakeholders.

Conclusions: Carrying out these actions will facilitate the development of methodological best practices for generating RWE to inform HTA of highly innovative medicines and build trust between stakeholders in the use of RWE.

Abstract Image

利益相关者为HTA/付款人决策提供更好的现实证据的行动。
目标:2020年,由比利时支付方委托的多方利益相关者倡议RWE4Decisions发布了利益相关者行动,以支持真实世界证据(RWE)的生成、分析和解释,为欧盟(EU)高度创新药物的卫生技术评估(HTA)机构/支付方的决策提供信息。自2020年以来,决策环境的变化和莱茵集团的进步推动了欧盟和加拿大利益相关者行动的更新。方法:RWE4Decisions的专家领导了与个人利益相关者群体(HTA机构/付款人、制药行业、临床医生、患者、注册持有人和数据分析专家)的焦点小组。每个焦点小组都为他们的利益相关者制定了新的行动,然后在多利益相关者会议、公共网络研讨会和公众咨询中讨论和修改这些行动。确定了跨行动和会议的主题。结果:提出了每个利益相关者群体的详细新行动。确定的关键主题是需要解决关于辅助数据使用和构建健壮RWE的方法的组织间碎片化问题。HTA机构/支付方需要对RWE的潜在用途形成一个共同的愿景。整个临床团队作为主要数据收集者的作用是至关重要的。在药物的整个生命周期中提供科学建议的机会至关重要,实施与HTA相关的RWE指南至关重要。要取得进展,需要采取具体的业务行动,并需要各利益攸关方共同努力。结论:开展这些行动将有助于开发方法上的最佳实践,以产生RWE,向卫生管理局通报高度创新的药物,并在RWE的使用中建立利益相关者之间的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信