ECG-Based Detection of Acute Myocardial Infarction using a Wrist-Worn Device.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Karolina Janciuleviciute, Daivaras Sokas, Justinas Bacevicius, Leif Sornmo, Andrius Petrenas
{"title":"ECG-Based Detection of Acute Myocardial Infarction using a Wrist-Worn Device.","authors":"Karolina Janciuleviciute, Daivaras Sokas, Justinas Bacevicius, Leif Sornmo, Andrius Petrenas","doi":"10.1109/TBME.2025.3580154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A wrist-worn wearable device for acquiring limb and chest ECG leads (wECG) may constitute a promising approach to detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, it remains to be demonstrated whether the information conveyed by the wECG is sufficient for AMI detection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore explainable machine learning models for detecting AMI using the wECG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two types of machine learning models are explored: a convolutional neural network (CNN) using the raw ECG as input and a gradient-boosting decision tree (GBDT) using clinically informative features. 123 participants were included, divided into patients with AMI, patients with other cardiovascular diseases, and healthy individuals. A wristworn device equipped with three biopotential electrodes was used to acquire two ECG leads with a single touch: limb lead I and another lead involving a specific body site, i.e., either the V3 or V5 electrode positions, or the abdomen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best performance on the test dataset is obtained using models that incorporate all four leads. The CNN model performs slightly better than the GBDT model, with a sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.75 compared to 0.77 and 0.72, respectively. When distinguishing between AMI and healthy participants, the specificity increases to 0.94 for the CNN model and 0.90 for the GBDT model. Feature importance analysis shows that the GBDT model primarily relies on the J point, while the CNN model primarily relies on the QRS complex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>wECG-based AMI detection shows considerable promise in out-of-hospital settings. However, caution is needed as CNN explanations rarely agree with the ECG intervals typically analyzed in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13245,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2025.3580154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A wrist-worn wearable device for acquiring limb and chest ECG leads (wECG) may constitute a promising approach to detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, it remains to be demonstrated whether the information conveyed by the wECG is sufficient for AMI detection.

Objective: To explore explainable machine learning models for detecting AMI using the wECG.

Methods: Two types of machine learning models are explored: a convolutional neural network (CNN) using the raw ECG as input and a gradient-boosting decision tree (GBDT) using clinically informative features. 123 participants were included, divided into patients with AMI, patients with other cardiovascular diseases, and healthy individuals. A wristworn device equipped with three biopotential electrodes was used to acquire two ECG leads with a single touch: limb lead I and another lead involving a specific body site, i.e., either the V3 or V5 electrode positions, or the abdomen.

Results: The best performance on the test dataset is obtained using models that incorporate all four leads. The CNN model performs slightly better than the GBDT model, with a sensitivity of 0.77 and specificity of 0.75 compared to 0.77 and 0.72, respectively. When distinguishing between AMI and healthy participants, the specificity increases to 0.94 for the CNN model and 0.90 for the GBDT model. Feature importance analysis shows that the GBDT model primarily relies on the J point, while the CNN model primarily relies on the QRS complex.

Conclusions: wECG-based AMI detection shows considerable promise in out-of-hospital settings. However, caution is needed as CNN explanations rarely agree with the ECG intervals typically analyzed in clinical practice.

基于心电图的腕戴设备检测急性心肌梗死。
背景:一种用于获取肢体和胸部心电图导联(wECG)的腕戴式可穿戴设备可能是检测急性心肌梗死(AMI)的一种很有前途的方法。然而,wECG传递的信息是否足以用于AMI检测还有待证实。目的:探讨利用脑电信号检测AMI的可解释性机器学习模型。方法:研究了两种类型的机器学习模型:使用原始ECG作为输入的卷积神经网络(CNN)和使用临床信息特征的梯度增强决策树(GBDT)。123名参与者被纳入研究,分为AMI患者、其他心血管疾病患者和健康人。一个配备了三个生物电位电极的腕带装置通过一次触摸获得两个ECG导联:肢体导联I和另一个涉及特定身体部位的导联,即V3或V5电极位置,或腹部。结果:在测试数据集上使用包含所有四个引线的模型获得最佳性能。CNN模型的表现略好于GBDT模型,其灵敏度为0.77,特异性为0.75,而GBDT模型的灵敏度为0.77,特异性为0.72。当区分AMI和健康参与者时,CNN模型的特异性增加到0.94,GBDT模型的特异性增加到0.90。特征重要性分析表明,GBDT模型主要依赖于J点,而CNN模型主要依赖于QRS复合体。结论:基于wecg的AMI检测在院外环境中显示出相当大的前景。然而,需要谨慎,因为CNN的解释很少与临床分析的心电图间期一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
880
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering contains basic and applied papers dealing with biomedical engineering. Papers range from engineering development in methods and techniques with biomedical applications to experimental and clinical investigations with engineering contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信