Impact of diclofenac risk minimization measures addressing cardiovascular risk on analgesic use in musculoskeletal disorders.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tomas Lasys, Yared Santa-Ana-Tellez, Satu J Siiskonen, Daniala L Weir, Rolf H H Groenwold, Helga Gardarsdottir
{"title":"Impact of diclofenac risk minimization measures addressing cardiovascular risk on analgesic use in musculoskeletal disorders.","authors":"Tomas Lasys, Yared Santa-Ana-Tellez, Satu J Siiskonen, Daniala L Weir, Rolf H H Groenwold, Helga Gardarsdottir","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In 2013, risk minimization measures (RMMs) were introduced in Europe to address the increased cardiovascular risk linked to diclofenac. This study aimed to assess the impact of those RMMs on analgesic use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary care data from CPRD GOLD (UK) were used. Patients newly diagnosed with musculoskeletal disorders during 2010-2019 were categorized into 4 cohorts, according to their diagnosis: acute (inflammatory) musculoskeletal conditions, chronic arthritic conditions, secondary arthritic conditions, or other painful conditions. The impact of the RMMs was studied using interrupted time series and survival analyses. Analyses were stratified by cardiovascular risk: (i) no risk factors or contraindications mentioned by RMMs; (ii) at least 1 risk factor; and (iii) at least 1 contraindication (prior cardiovascular events).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1 798 885 patients were included, with >28% having at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor and >7% having at least 1 contraindication for diclofenac. Initiation of diclofenac was already decreasing before the RMMs, but the RMMs were associated with a further immediate decrease in 2 cohorts (from -0.9 to -1.6%). No substantial difference in impact was observed depending on cardiovascular risk. The time from diagnosis to analgesic treatment increased after RMMs implementation, especially in patients with chronic arthritic conditions: median time increased from 4.2 to 7.6 months [95% confidence interval 4.0-4.5 and 7.4-7.8, respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The observed decrease of diclofenac initiation was unrelated to patients' cardiovascular risk. Continued prescribing of systemic diclofenac to patients with contraindications suggests limited impact of RMMs. Increased time from diagnosis to analgesic treatment suggests broader changes in analgesic prescribing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: In 2013, risk minimization measures (RMMs) were introduced in Europe to address the increased cardiovascular risk linked to diclofenac. This study aimed to assess the impact of those RMMs on analgesic use.

Methods: Primary care data from CPRD GOLD (UK) were used. Patients newly diagnosed with musculoskeletal disorders during 2010-2019 were categorized into 4 cohorts, according to their diagnosis: acute (inflammatory) musculoskeletal conditions, chronic arthritic conditions, secondary arthritic conditions, or other painful conditions. The impact of the RMMs was studied using interrupted time series and survival analyses. Analyses were stratified by cardiovascular risk: (i) no risk factors or contraindications mentioned by RMMs; (ii) at least 1 risk factor; and (iii) at least 1 contraindication (prior cardiovascular events).

Results: In total, 1 798 885 patients were included, with >28% having at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor and >7% having at least 1 contraindication for diclofenac. Initiation of diclofenac was already decreasing before the RMMs, but the RMMs were associated with a further immediate decrease in 2 cohorts (from -0.9 to -1.6%). No substantial difference in impact was observed depending on cardiovascular risk. The time from diagnosis to analgesic treatment increased after RMMs implementation, especially in patients with chronic arthritic conditions: median time increased from 4.2 to 7.6 months [95% confidence interval 4.0-4.5 and 7.4-7.8, respectively].

Conclusion: The observed decrease of diclofenac initiation was unrelated to patients' cardiovascular risk. Continued prescribing of systemic diclofenac to patients with contraindications suggests limited impact of RMMs. Increased time from diagnosis to analgesic treatment suggests broader changes in analgesic prescribing practices.

针对心血管风险的双氯芬酸风险最小化措施对肌肉骨骼疾病中止痛药使用的影响
目的:2013年,欧洲引入了风险最小化措施(RMMs),以解决与双氯芬酸相关的心血管风险增加问题。本研究旨在评估这些RMMs对镇痛药使用的影响。方法:使用CPRD GOLD (UK)的初级保健数据。2010-2019年期间新诊断为肌肉骨骼疾病的患者根据其诊断分为4组:急性(炎症性)肌肉骨骼疾病、慢性关节炎、继发性关节炎或其他疼痛疾病。使用中断时间序列和生存分析来研究RMMs的影响。根据心血管风险对分析进行分层:(i)没有RMMs提到的危险因素或禁忌症;(ii)至少一个风险因素;(iii)至少有1项禁忌症(既往心血管事件)。结果:共纳入1 798 885例患者,其中>28%至少有1项心血管危险因素,>7%至少有1项双氯芬酸禁忌症。在RMMs之前,双氯芬酸的起始剂量已经在下降,但在2个队列中,RMMs与进一步的立即下降相关(从-0.9到-1.6%)。没有观察到心血管风险的影响有实质性差异。实施RMMs后,从诊断到镇痛治疗的时间增加,特别是慢性关节炎患者:中位时间从4.2个月增加到7.6个月[95%置信区间分别为4.0-4.5和7.4-7.8]。结论:双氯芬酸起始剂量的降低与患者心血管风险无关。对有禁忌症的患者继续开全身性双氯芬酸处方表明RMMs的影响有限。从诊断到止痛治疗的时间增加,表明止痛处方的做法发生了更广泛的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信