Trends in low birth weight across 36 states and union territories in India, 1993-2021.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Omar Karlsson, Akhil Kumar, Rockli Kim, S V Subramanian
{"title":"Trends in low birth weight across 36 states and union territories in India, 1993-2021.","authors":"Omar Karlsson, Akhil Kumar, Rockli Kim, S V Subramanian","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low birth weight is an important measure of the health of pregnant women and newborns. We investigated the prevalence of low birth weights in India over nearly three decades to assess trends and convergence across states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came from five waves of the National Family Health Survey (1992-93 to 2019-21). The prevalence of low birth weight was estimated. To explore the sensitivity of our results to missing birth weight data-since the completeness of birth weight information has changed drastically-we also estimated prevalence from multiple imputation models, Heckman selection models, and by reweighting the data so that socioeconomic characteristics of children with birth weight data matched across surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of low birth weight in India declined from 26% to 18% during the period. The 2019-21 survey revealed that four states, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Maharashtra, and West Bengal accounted for almost half of all low-birth-weight births in India. The Pearson's correlation between the prevalence of low birth weight in 1992-93 and percentage point change across the period was -0.85, suggesting convergence between states, where states with greater prevalence in 1992-93 had faster declines. Convergence was robust across sensitivity specifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>State-level convergence indicates a potential 'catch-up' phenomenon, where states with initially higher prevalence have experienced greater declines. This finding suggested a possible impact of interventions prompted by dire figures in the earliest surveys, yet also stresses the necessity for continued interventions across all states to maintain and further progress. Our analysis, however, warrants a cautious interpretation due to data limitations. However, we observed convergence in the prevalence of low birth weight across states in all sensitivity specifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016732","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Low birth weight is an important measure of the health of pregnant women and newborns. We investigated the prevalence of low birth weights in India over nearly three decades to assess trends and convergence across states.

Methods: Data came from five waves of the National Family Health Survey (1992-93 to 2019-21). The prevalence of low birth weight was estimated. To explore the sensitivity of our results to missing birth weight data-since the completeness of birth weight information has changed drastically-we also estimated prevalence from multiple imputation models, Heckman selection models, and by reweighting the data so that socioeconomic characteristics of children with birth weight data matched across surveys.

Results: The overall prevalence of low birth weight in India declined from 26% to 18% during the period. The 2019-21 survey revealed that four states, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Maharashtra, and West Bengal accounted for almost half of all low-birth-weight births in India. The Pearson's correlation between the prevalence of low birth weight in 1992-93 and percentage point change across the period was -0.85, suggesting convergence between states, where states with greater prevalence in 1992-93 had faster declines. Convergence was robust across sensitivity specifications.

Conclusion: State-level convergence indicates a potential 'catch-up' phenomenon, where states with initially higher prevalence have experienced greater declines. This finding suggested a possible impact of interventions prompted by dire figures in the earliest surveys, yet also stresses the necessity for continued interventions across all states to maintain and further progress. Our analysis, however, warrants a cautious interpretation due to data limitations. However, we observed convergence in the prevalence of low birth weight across states in all sensitivity specifications.

1993-2021年印度36个邦和联邦直辖区低出生体重趋势。
低出生体重是衡量孕妇和新生儿健康状况的重要指标。我们调查了近三十年来印度低出生体重的流行情况,以评估各州的趋势和趋同程度。方法:数据来自全国家庭健康调查(1992-93年至2019-21年)的五波。估计了低出生体重的患病率。为了探索我们的结果对缺失出生体重数据的敏感性——因为出生体重信息的完整性已经发生了巨大的变化——我们还从多个imputation模型、Heckman选择模型中估计了患病率,并通过重新加权数据,使具有出生体重数据的儿童的社会经济特征在调查中相匹配。结果:在此期间,印度低出生体重的总体患病率从26%下降到18%。2019-21年的调查显示,北方邦、比哈尔邦、马哈拉施特拉邦和西孟加拉邦这四个邦几乎占了印度所有低体重新生儿的一半。1992-93年低出生体重的患病率与这一时期的百分点变化之间的Pearson相关性为-0.85,表明各州之间存在趋同,1992-93年患病率较高的州下降速度更快。各灵敏度指标的收敛性都很强。结论:州一级的趋同表明了一种潜在的“追赶”现象,即最初患病率较高的州经历了更大的下降。这一发现表明,早期调查中可怕的数字可能引发干预措施的影响,但也强调了在所有州继续进行干预以保持和进一步进展的必要性。然而,由于数据的限制,我们的分析需要谨慎的解释。然而,我们观察到,在所有敏感性指标中,各州的低出生体重患病率趋于一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信