Omar Karlsson, Akhil Kumar, Rockli Kim, S V Subramanian
{"title":"Trends in low birth weight across 36 states and union territories in India, 1993-2021.","authors":"Omar Karlsson, Akhil Kumar, Rockli Kim, S V Subramanian","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low birth weight is an important measure of the health of pregnant women and newborns. We investigated the prevalence of low birth weights in India over nearly three decades to assess trends and convergence across states.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came from five waves of the National Family Health Survey (1992-93 to 2019-21). The prevalence of low birth weight was estimated. To explore the sensitivity of our results to missing birth weight data-since the completeness of birth weight information has changed drastically-we also estimated prevalence from multiple imputation models, Heckman selection models, and by reweighting the data so that socioeconomic characteristics of children with birth weight data matched across surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of low birth weight in India declined from 26% to 18% during the period. The 2019-21 survey revealed that four states, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Maharashtra, and West Bengal accounted for almost half of all low-birth-weight births in India. The Pearson's correlation between the prevalence of low birth weight in 1992-93 and percentage point change across the period was -0.85, suggesting convergence between states, where states with greater prevalence in 1992-93 had faster declines. Convergence was robust across sensitivity specifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>State-level convergence indicates a potential 'catch-up' phenomenon, where states with initially higher prevalence have experienced greater declines. This finding suggested a possible impact of interventions prompted by dire figures in the earliest surveys, yet also stresses the necessity for continued interventions across all states to maintain and further progress. Our analysis, however, warrants a cautious interpretation due to data limitations. However, we observed convergence in the prevalence of low birth weight across states in all sensitivity specifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016732","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Low birth weight is an important measure of the health of pregnant women and newborns. We investigated the prevalence of low birth weights in India over nearly three decades to assess trends and convergence across states.
Methods: Data came from five waves of the National Family Health Survey (1992-93 to 2019-21). The prevalence of low birth weight was estimated. To explore the sensitivity of our results to missing birth weight data-since the completeness of birth weight information has changed drastically-we also estimated prevalence from multiple imputation models, Heckman selection models, and by reweighting the data so that socioeconomic characteristics of children with birth weight data matched across surveys.
Results: The overall prevalence of low birth weight in India declined from 26% to 18% during the period. The 2019-21 survey revealed that four states, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Maharashtra, and West Bengal accounted for almost half of all low-birth-weight births in India. The Pearson's correlation between the prevalence of low birth weight in 1992-93 and percentage point change across the period was -0.85, suggesting convergence between states, where states with greater prevalence in 1992-93 had faster declines. Convergence was robust across sensitivity specifications.
Conclusion: State-level convergence indicates a potential 'catch-up' phenomenon, where states with initially higher prevalence have experienced greater declines. This finding suggested a possible impact of interventions prompted by dire figures in the earliest surveys, yet also stresses the necessity for continued interventions across all states to maintain and further progress. Our analysis, however, warrants a cautious interpretation due to data limitations. However, we observed convergence in the prevalence of low birth weight across states in all sensitivity specifications.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.