Frederik Emil Juul, Michael Bretthauer, Peter H Johnsen, Faye Samy, Kristian Tonby, Jan Erik Berdal, Dag Arne L Hoff, Eirik H Ofstad, Awet Abraham, Birgitte Seip, Håvard Wiig, Øyvind Bakken Rognstad, Ida F Glad, Jørgen Valeur, Axel E Nissen-Lie, Eivind Ness-Jensen, Kristine M A Lund, Linn K Skjevling, Kurt Hanevik, Hilde Skudal, Ellen J Melsom, Raziye Boyar, Trond J Cooper, Trond E Ranheim, Esben M Riise, Hans-Olov Adami, Mette Kalager, Magnus Løberg, Kjetil K Garborg
{"title":"Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Versus Vancomycin for Primary <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection : A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Frederik Emil Juul, Michael Bretthauer, Peter H Johnsen, Faye Samy, Kristian Tonby, Jan Erik Berdal, Dag Arne L Hoff, Eirik H Ofstad, Awet Abraham, Birgitte Seip, Håvard Wiig, Øyvind Bakken Rognstad, Ida F Glad, Jørgen Valeur, Axel E Nissen-Lie, Eivind Ness-Jensen, Kristine M A Lund, Linn K Skjevling, Kurt Hanevik, Hilde Skudal, Ellen J Melsom, Raziye Boyar, Trond J Cooper, Trond E Ranheim, Esben M Riise, Hans-Olov Adami, Mette Kalager, Magnus Løberg, Kjetil K Garborg","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-03285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is recommended for recurrent <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI), but its role in primary CDI is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of FMT in primary CDI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, open-label, noninferiority, multicenter trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03796650).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospitals and primary care facilities in Norway.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with CDI (<i>C difficile</i> toxin in stool and ≥3 loose stools daily) and no previous CDI within 365 days before enrollment.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>FMT without antibiotic pretreatment versus oral vancomycin, 125 mg 4 times daily for 10 days.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The primary end point was clinical cure (firm stools or <3 bowel movements daily) at day 14 and no disease recurrence within 60 days with the assigned treatment alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 104 randomly assigned patients, 100 received FMT or the first dose of vancomycin and were eligible for analysis. Clinical cure and no disease recurrence within 60 days without additional treatment was observed in 34 of 51 patients (66.7%) with FMT versus 30 of 49 (61.2%) with vancomycin (difference, 5.4 percentage points [95.2% CI, -13.5 to 24.4 percentage points]; <i>P</i> for noninferiority < 0.001, rejecting the hypothesis that response to FMT is 25 percentage points lower than response to vancomycin). Eleven patients in the FMT group and 4 in the vancomycin group had additional <i>C difficile</i> treatment. Clinical cure at day 14 and no recurrence with or without additional treatment was observed in 40 of 51 patients (78.4%) with FMT and 30 of 49 (61.2%) with vancomycin (difference, 17.2 percentage points [95.2% CI, -0.7 to 35.1 percentage points]). No significant differences in adverse events were observed between groups.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Open-label design and reliance on clinical end points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FMT may be considered as first-line therapy in primary CDI.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>South-East Norway Health Trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-03285","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is recommended for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), but its role in primary CDI is unclear.
Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of FMT in primary CDI.
Setting: Hospitals and primary care facilities in Norway.
Patients: Adults with CDI (C difficile toxin in stool and ≥3 loose stools daily) and no previous CDI within 365 days before enrollment.
Intervention: FMT without antibiotic pretreatment versus oral vancomycin, 125 mg 4 times daily for 10 days.
Measurements: The primary end point was clinical cure (firm stools or <3 bowel movements daily) at day 14 and no disease recurrence within 60 days with the assigned treatment alone.
Results: Of 104 randomly assigned patients, 100 received FMT or the first dose of vancomycin and were eligible for analysis. Clinical cure and no disease recurrence within 60 days without additional treatment was observed in 34 of 51 patients (66.7%) with FMT versus 30 of 49 (61.2%) with vancomycin (difference, 5.4 percentage points [95.2% CI, -13.5 to 24.4 percentage points]; P for noninferiority < 0.001, rejecting the hypothesis that response to FMT is 25 percentage points lower than response to vancomycin). Eleven patients in the FMT group and 4 in the vancomycin group had additional C difficile treatment. Clinical cure at day 14 and no recurrence with or without additional treatment was observed in 40 of 51 patients (78.4%) with FMT and 30 of 49 (61.2%) with vancomycin (difference, 17.2 percentage points [95.2% CI, -0.7 to 35.1 percentage points]). No significant differences in adverse events were observed between groups.
Limitations: Open-label design and reliance on clinical end points.
Conclusion: FMT may be considered as first-line therapy in primary CDI.
Primary funding source: South-East Norway Health Trust.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.