Retrospective Study of 43 Cases of Visceral Artery Aneurysms: Evaluation of Surgical Indications Based on the 2020 Revised Guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery.
{"title":"Retrospective Study of 43 Cases of Visceral Artery Aneurysms: Evaluation of Surgical Indications Based on the 2020 Revised Guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery.","authors":"Nozomu Ishikawa, Kazunori Inuzuka, Masaki Sano, Kazuto Katahashi, Hajime Tsuyuki, Yusuke Endo, Takaaki Saito, Hiroya Takeuchi, Naoki Unno","doi":"10.3400/avd.oa.24-00128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Advancements in imaging technology have led to an increase in the incidental detection of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs), which are associated with high mortality when ruptured. In 2020, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) released updated guidelines, replacing the previous 2005 ACC/AHA recommendations. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the new guidelines through a retrospective analysis of VAA cases treated at our department. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively reviewed 43 cases of VAA treated between 2002 and 2024 at our department. Each case was re-evaluated to determine whether it met the treatment criteria defined in the 2020 SVS guidelines. <b>Results:</b> Of the 43 cases, 23 (53.5%) met the new guideline criteria. Notably, treatment eligibility for renal and splenic artery aneurysms decreased significantly due to the revised aneurysm size threshold, raised from 2 to 3 cm. The remaining 20 cases were considered ineligible based solely on size, with the exception of cases involving young female patients, ruptured aneurysms, symptomatic lesions, or pseudoaneurysms. <b>Conclusions:</b> The 2020 SVS guidelines impose stricter treatment indications for VAAs. However, clinical decisions should also consider aneurysm location, patient age, gender, symptoms, and rupture risk on an individual basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7995,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular diseases","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.24-00128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Advancements in imaging technology have led to an increase in the incidental detection of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs), which are associated with high mortality when ruptured. In 2020, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) released updated guidelines, replacing the previous 2005 ACC/AHA recommendations. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the new guidelines through a retrospective analysis of VAA cases treated at our department. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 43 cases of VAA treated between 2002 and 2024 at our department. Each case was re-evaluated to determine whether it met the treatment criteria defined in the 2020 SVS guidelines. Results: Of the 43 cases, 23 (53.5%) met the new guideline criteria. Notably, treatment eligibility for renal and splenic artery aneurysms decreased significantly due to the revised aneurysm size threshold, raised from 2 to 3 cm. The remaining 20 cases were considered ineligible based solely on size, with the exception of cases involving young female patients, ruptured aneurysms, symptomatic lesions, or pseudoaneurysms. Conclusions: The 2020 SVS guidelines impose stricter treatment indications for VAAs. However, clinical decisions should also consider aneurysm location, patient age, gender, symptoms, and rupture risk on an individual basis.