Independent validation and outlier analysis of EuroPOND alzheimer's disease staging model using ADNI and real-world clinical data.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mandy M J Wittens, Diana M Sima, Arne Brys, Hanne Struyfs, Ellis Niemantsverdriet, Ellen De Roeck, Christine Bastin, Florence Benoit, Bruno Bergmans, Jean-Christophe Bier, Peter Paul de Deyn, Olivier Deryck, Bernard Hanseeuw, Adrian Ivanoiu, Gaëtane Picard, Eric Salmon, Kurt Segers, Anne Sieben, Evert Thiery, Jos Tournoy, Anne-Marie van Binst, Jan Versijpt, Dirk Smeets, Maria Bjerke, Maura Bellio, Neil P Oxtoby, Daniel C Alexander, Annemie Ribbens, Sebastiaan Engelborghs
{"title":"Independent validation and outlier analysis of EuroPOND alzheimer's disease staging model using ADNI and real-world clinical data.","authors":"Mandy M J Wittens, Diana M Sima, Arne Brys, Hanne Struyfs, Ellis Niemantsverdriet, Ellen De Roeck, Christine Bastin, Florence Benoit, Bruno Bergmans, Jean-Christophe Bier, Peter Paul de Deyn, Olivier Deryck, Bernard Hanseeuw, Adrian Ivanoiu, Gaëtane Picard, Eric Salmon, Kurt Segers, Anne Sieben, Evert Thiery, Jos Tournoy, Anne-Marie van Binst, Jan Versijpt, Dirk Smeets, Maria Bjerke, Maura Bellio, Neil P Oxtoby, Daniel C Alexander, Annemie Ribbens, Sebastiaan Engelborghs","doi":"10.1186/s13195-025-01788-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Event-based modeling (EBM) traces sequential progression of events in complex processes like neurodegenerative diseases, adept at handling uncertainties. This study validated an EBM for Alzheimer's disease (AD) staging designed by EuroPOND, an EU-funded Horizon 2020 project, using research and real-world datasets, a crucial step towards application in multi-center trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The training dataset comprised 1737 subjects from ADNI-1/GO/2, using the EuroPOND EBM toolbox. Testing datasets included a research cohort from University of Antwerp (controls, CN (n = 46), subjective cognitive decline, SCD (n = 10), mild cognitive impairment, MCI (n = 47), AD dementia, ADD (n = 16)) and a real-world cohort from 9 Belgian Dementia Council memory clinics (CN (n = 91), SCD (n = 66), (non-amnestic) naMCI (n = 54), aMCI (n = 255), and ADD (n = 220). Biomarkers included: 2 clinical scores (Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)); 3 CSF-biomarkers (Aβ<sub>1-42</sub>, P-tau<sub>181</sub>, total-Tau); and 4 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers (volumes of the hippocampi, temporal, parietal, and frontal cortices) computed with icobrain dm. The naMCI and aMCI groups were compared by EBM stage proportions, and the model's effectiveness at patient level was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The research cohort's maximum likelihood event sequence comprised CSF Aβ<sub>1-42</sub>, P-tau<sub>181</sub>, T-tau, RAVLT, MMSE, and cortical volumes. The clinical cohort's order was frontal cortex volume, MMSE, and remaining cortical regions. aMCI subjects showed higher staging than naMCI, with 54% in the two most advanced stages compared to 38% in naMCI. In the research cohort, 10 outliers were identified with potential mismatches between assigned stages and clinical or biomarker profiles, with CN (n = 4) and SCD (n = 2) subjects assigned in stage 4, one control in stage 9 with abnormal imaging, and three aMCI cases in stage 0 despite clinical or volumetric signs of impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the generalizability of EuroPOND's AD EBM model across research and real-world clinical datasets, supporting its use in multi-center trials. aMCI subjects generally reside in more advanced stages than naMCI, who may not necessarily have AD, demonstrating utility for precision recruitment/screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12172318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-025-01788-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Event-based modeling (EBM) traces sequential progression of events in complex processes like neurodegenerative diseases, adept at handling uncertainties. This study validated an EBM for Alzheimer's disease (AD) staging designed by EuroPOND, an EU-funded Horizon 2020 project, using research and real-world datasets, a crucial step towards application in multi-center trials.

Methods: The training dataset comprised 1737 subjects from ADNI-1/GO/2, using the EuroPOND EBM toolbox. Testing datasets included a research cohort from University of Antwerp (controls, CN (n = 46), subjective cognitive decline, SCD (n = 10), mild cognitive impairment, MCI (n = 47), AD dementia, ADD (n = 16)) and a real-world cohort from 9 Belgian Dementia Council memory clinics (CN (n = 91), SCD (n = 66), (non-amnestic) naMCI (n = 54), aMCI (n = 255), and ADD (n = 220). Biomarkers included: 2 clinical scores (Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)); 3 CSF-biomarkers (Aβ1-42, P-tau181, total-Tau); and 4 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers (volumes of the hippocampi, temporal, parietal, and frontal cortices) computed with icobrain dm. The naMCI and aMCI groups were compared by EBM stage proportions, and the model's effectiveness at patient level was evaluated.

Results: The research cohort's maximum likelihood event sequence comprised CSF Aβ1-42, P-tau181, T-tau, RAVLT, MMSE, and cortical volumes. The clinical cohort's order was frontal cortex volume, MMSE, and remaining cortical regions. aMCI subjects showed higher staging than naMCI, with 54% in the two most advanced stages compared to 38% in naMCI. In the research cohort, 10 outliers were identified with potential mismatches between assigned stages and clinical or biomarker profiles, with CN (n = 4) and SCD (n = 2) subjects assigned in stage 4, one control in stage 9 with abnormal imaging, and three aMCI cases in stage 0 despite clinical or volumetric signs of impairment.

Conclusions: This study highlights the generalizability of EuroPOND's AD EBM model across research and real-world clinical datasets, supporting its use in multi-center trials. aMCI subjects generally reside in more advanced stages than naMCI, who may not necessarily have AD, demonstrating utility for precision recruitment/screening.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用ADNI和真实世界临床数据的EuroPOND阿尔茨海默病分期模型的独立验证和离群分析。
背景:基于事件的建模(EBM)追踪神经退行性疾病等复杂过程中事件的顺序进展,擅长处理不确定性。该研究通过研究和现实世界数据集验证了由欧盟资助的Horizon 2020项目EuroPOND设计的阿尔茨海默病(AD)分期的循证医学,这是向多中心试验应用迈出的关键一步。方法:训练数据集包括来自ADNI-1/GO/2的1737名受试者,使用EuroPOND EBM工具箱。测试数据集包括来自安特卫普大学的研究队列(对照组,CN (n = 46),主观认知能力下降,SCD (n = 10),轻度认知障碍,MCI (n = 47), AD痴呆,ADD (n = 16))和来自9个比利时痴呆委员会记忆诊所的现实队列(CN (n = 91), SCD (n = 66),(非遗忘)naMCI (n = 54), aMCI (n = 255)和ADD (n = 220))。生物标志物包括:2项临床评分(迷你精神状态检查(MMSE), Rey听觉语言学习测试(RAVLT));3个csf生物标志物(a - β1-42, P-tau181, total-Tau);并用icobrain dm计算4种磁共振成像(MRI)生物标志物(海马、颞叶、顶叶和额叶皮质的体积)。通过EBM分期比例比较naMCI组和aMCI组,并评估模型在患者水平上的有效性。结果:研究队列的最大似然事件序列包括CSF a - β1-42、P-tau181、T-tau、RAVLT、MMSE和皮质体积。临床队列的顺序是额叶皮质体积、MMSE和剩余皮质区域。aMCI患者比naMCI患者表现出更高的分期,54%的患者处于两个最晚期,而naMCI患者为38%。在研究队列中,确定了10个异常值,在指定的分期与临床或生物标志物资料之间存在潜在的不匹配,CN (n = 4)和SCD (n = 2)受试者被分配为第4期,1名对照患者被分配为第9期,尽管有临床或体积损伤迹象,但仍有3名aMCI患者被分配为第0期。结论:本研究强调了EuroPOND的AD - EBM模型在研究和现实世界临床数据集中的普遍性,支持其在多中心试验中的应用。aMCI受试者通常处于比naMCI患者更晚期的阶段,他们不一定患有AD,这证明了精确招募/筛选的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信