Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as a standard of care for pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.7 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Mohammed Saed Shorbagy, Ramy Mahrose, Amr A Kasem, Yasmin Abdelrazik Ali, Sally Hamdy Abdelaziz
{"title":"Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as a standard of care for pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Mohammed Saed Shorbagy, Ramy Mahrose, Amr A Kasem, Yasmin Abdelrazik Ali, Sally Hamdy Abdelaziz","doi":"10.5114/ait/200231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sedative premedication may hold notable significance in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization, as it minimizes anxiety, facilitates parental separation, and allows for the acceptance of inhalational induction. The intranasal route is a reliable method for administering sedatives as pre- medication in pediatric patients. This study compared and evaluated the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as premedication in pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blind study included 40 pediatric patients aged 3 to 6 years scheduled for transcatheter perimembranous VSD closure under general anesthesia. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal midazolam at 0.2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> body mass or intranasal dexmedetomidine at 0.5 μg kg<sup>-1</sup> body mass. The primary outcome measured was the effect of preoperative sedatives on the Ramsay sedation score. Secondary outcomes included the child-parent separation score, child emergence agitation level, effects on hemodynamics, and oxygen saturation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 40 individuals with similar demographic profiles and comparable duration of the procedure (<i>P</i> = 0.152) in both groups. No statistically significant differences were detected in the Ramsay sedation score (<i>P</i> = 0.582), child-parent separation score (<i>P</i> = 1.000) 20 minutes after drug administration, or postoperative child emergence agitation level (<i>P</i> = 0.351). No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pediatric patients were successfully and effectively sedated with both intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam, with stable hemodynamics and oxygen saturation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"57 1","pages":"115-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12210370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait/200231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sedative premedication may hold notable significance in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization, as it minimizes anxiety, facilitates parental separation, and allows for the acceptance of inhalational induction. The intranasal route is a reliable method for administering sedatives as pre- medication in pediatric patients. This study compared and evaluated the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as premedication in pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects.

Material and methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study included 40 pediatric patients aged 3 to 6 years scheduled for transcatheter perimembranous VSD closure under general anesthesia. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal midazolam at 0.2 mg kg-1 body mass or intranasal dexmedetomidine at 0.5 μg kg-1 body mass. The primary outcome measured was the effect of preoperative sedatives on the Ramsay sedation score. Secondary outcomes included the child-parent separation score, child emergence agitation level, effects on hemodynamics, and oxygen saturation.

Results: This study included 40 individuals with similar demographic profiles and comparable duration of the procedure (P = 0.152) in both groups. No statistically significant differences were detected in the Ramsay sedation score (P = 0.582), child-parent separation score (P = 1.000) 20 minutes after drug administration, or postoperative child emergence agitation level (P = 0.351). No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation between the two groups.

Conclusions: Pediatric patients were successfully and effectively sedated with both intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam, with stable hemodynamics and oxygen saturation.

鼻内右美托咪定与鼻内咪达唑仑作为经导管膜周室间隔缺损(VSD)闭合的儿科患者的标准护理:一项随机对照试验
导读:在接受诊断性和介入性心导管插入术的儿科患者中,镇静预用药可能具有显著的意义,因为它可以最大限度地减少焦虑,促进父母分离,并允许接受吸入诱导。鼻内途径是一种可靠的方法,给药镇静作为前用药的儿科患者。本研究比较和评估了鼻内右美托咪定与鼻内咪达唑仑作为经导管闭合术治疗室间隔缺损的儿科患者的前用药的镇静效果。材料和方法:这项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究纳入了40例3至6岁的儿童患者,他们计划在全身麻醉下进行经导管膜周室间隔闭合术。受试者被随机分配接受0.2 mg kg-1体重的咪达唑仑鼻内治疗或0.5 mg kg-1体重的右美托咪定鼻内治疗。测量的主要结局是术前镇静剂对Ramsay镇静评分的影响。次要结局包括亲子分离评分、儿童出现时躁动程度、对血流动力学的影响和血氧饱和度。结果:本研究纳入了40名患者,两组患者具有相似的人口统计学特征和相当的手术时间(P = 0.152)。给药后20分钟Ramsay镇静评分(P = 0.582)、亲子分离评分(P = 1.000)、患儿术后出现躁动水平(P = 0.351)差异均无统计学意义。两组患者血压、心率、血氧饱和度差异无统计学意义。结论:患儿鼻用右美托咪定和鼻用咪达唑仑均可成功有效镇静患儿,血流动力学和血氧饱和度稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信