Morphological differences between wild and game-farm Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) in North America

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q1 ORNITHOLOGY
Ibis Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1111/ibi.13391
Susannah L. Halligan, Michael L. Schummer, Auriel M. V. Fournier, Philip Lavretsky, J. Brian Davis, Cynthia J. Downs, Vergie Musni
{"title":"Morphological differences between wild and game-farm Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) in North America","authors":"Susannah L. Halligan,&nbsp;Michael L. Schummer,&nbsp;Auriel M. V. Fournier,&nbsp;Philip Lavretsky,&nbsp;J. Brian Davis,&nbsp;Cynthia J. Downs,&nbsp;Vergie Musni","doi":"10.1111/ibi.13391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large-scale releases of domesticated, game-farm Mallards <i>Anas platyrhynchos</i> to supplement wild populations have resulted in widespread introgressive hybridization that changed the genetic constitution of wild populations in eastern North America. The resulting gene flow is well documented between game-farm and wild Mallards, but the mechanistic consequences from such interactions remain unknown in North America. We provide the first study to characterize and investigate potential differences in morphology between genetically known, wild and game-farm Mallards in North America. We used nine morphological measurements to discriminate between wild and game-farm Mallards with 96% accuracy. Compared with their wild counterparts, game-farm Mallards had longer bodies and tarsi, shorter heads and wings, and shorter, wider and taller bills. The nail on the end of the bill of game-farm Mallards was longer, and game-farm Mallard bills had a greater lamellae:bill length ratio than wild Mallards. Differences in body morphologies between wild and game-farm Mallards are consistent with an artificial, terrestrial life whereby game-farm Mallards are fed pelleted foods, resulting in artificial selection for a more ‘goose-like’ bill. We posit that: (1) game-farm Mallards have diverged from their wild ancestral traits of flying and filter feeding towards becoming optimized to run and peck for food; (2) game-farm morphological traits optimized over the last 400 years in domestic environments are likely to be maladaptive in the wild; and (3) the introgression of such traits into wild populations is likely to reduce fitness. Understanding the effects of game-farm Mallard introgression requires analysis of various game-farm × wild hybrid generations to determine how domestically derived traits persist or diminish with each generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13254,"journal":{"name":"Ibis","volume":"167 3","pages":"720-733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ibi.13391","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibis","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ibi.13391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large-scale releases of domesticated, game-farm Mallards Anas platyrhynchos to supplement wild populations have resulted in widespread introgressive hybridization that changed the genetic constitution of wild populations in eastern North America. The resulting gene flow is well documented between game-farm and wild Mallards, but the mechanistic consequences from such interactions remain unknown in North America. We provide the first study to characterize and investigate potential differences in morphology between genetically known, wild and game-farm Mallards in North America. We used nine morphological measurements to discriminate between wild and game-farm Mallards with 96% accuracy. Compared with their wild counterparts, game-farm Mallards had longer bodies and tarsi, shorter heads and wings, and shorter, wider and taller bills. The nail on the end of the bill of game-farm Mallards was longer, and game-farm Mallard bills had a greater lamellae:bill length ratio than wild Mallards. Differences in body morphologies between wild and game-farm Mallards are consistent with an artificial, terrestrial life whereby game-farm Mallards are fed pelleted foods, resulting in artificial selection for a more ‘goose-like’ bill. We posit that: (1) game-farm Mallards have diverged from their wild ancestral traits of flying and filter feeding towards becoming optimized to run and peck for food; (2) game-farm morphological traits optimized over the last 400 years in domestic environments are likely to be maladaptive in the wild; and (3) the introgression of such traits into wild populations is likely to reduce fitness. Understanding the effects of game-farm Mallard introgression requires analysis of various game-farm × wild hybrid generations to determine how domestically derived traits persist or diminish with each generation.

Abstract Image

北美野生绿头鸭与圈养绿头鸭的形态差异
大规模的圈养野化绿头鸭(mallard Anas platyrhynchos)被放归以补充野生种群,导致了广泛的渐进杂交,改变了北美东部野生种群的遗传构成。由此产生的基因流动在游戏农场和野生绿头鸭之间有很好的记录,但这种相互作用的机制后果在北美仍然未知。我们提供了第一项研究,以表征和调查在遗传上已知的北美野鸭,野生野鸭和游戏农场野鸭之间的潜在形态学差异。我们使用了9种形态测量来区分野生绿头鸭和圈养绿头鸭,准确率为96%。与野生野鸭相比,农场野鸭的身体和跗关节更长,头部和翅膀更短,喙更短、更宽、更高。猎场野鸭的喙端钉较长,且比野生野鸭有更大的片喙长比。野生野鸭和圈养野鸭身体形态的差异与人工的陆地生活相一致,即圈养野鸭被喂食颗粒状食物,导致人工选择更“像鹅”的嘴。我们认为:(1)野场绿头鸭已经从其野生祖先的飞行和滤食特征向优化的奔跑和啄食特征转变;(2)过去400年在家养环境中优化的游戏农场形态特征可能在野外环境中不适应;(3)这些性状向野生种群的渗透可能会降低适应度。要了解野生鸭遗传渗入的影响,需要分析各种野生鸭和野生鸭的杂交后代,以确定每一代野生鸭的内源性状是如何持续或减少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ibis
Ibis 生物-鸟类学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: IBIS publishes original papers, reviews, short communications and forum articles reflecting the forefront of international research activity in ornithological science, with special emphasis on the behaviour, ecology, evolution and conservation of birds. IBIS aims to publish as rapidly as is consistent with the requirements of peer-review and normal publishing constraints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信