Cultural security in the context of globalization: A bibliometric analysis and trend exploration

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Haohan Meng , Zihan Wang, Xiaoyu Li, Jinhua Sun
{"title":"Cultural security in the context of globalization: A bibliometric analysis and trend exploration","authors":"Haohan Meng ,&nbsp;Zihan Wang,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Li,&nbsp;Jinhua Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As globalization advances, both cultural diversity and homogenization spread globally, intensifying local communities’ concerns about cultural security. This study uses bibliometric analysis of 520 articles from the Web of Science Core Collection, combining quantitative and qualitative methods, to explore the relationship between globalization and cultural security. It identifies key issues, examines research trends, and highlights the evolution of the field. Findings show that globalization accelerates cultural exchange through international networks but also exacerbates cultural homogenization, undermining individuals’ sense of security. The spread of foreign cultures threatens indigenous traditions, prompting nationalism and cultural protectionism, and raising awareness of cultural security. Research in this area focuses on three main themes: psychological and social behavioral changes, challenges to cultural identity and heritage preservation, and debates on nationalism. Over time, the focus has shifted from globalization’s risks to cultural identity toward strategies for cultural protection and localized responses, with a growing interest in the polarizing effects of globalization. Cultural security has become a national priority, with emphasis on both cultural preservation and integration. Regionally, cultural security imbalances persist, especially in areas where cultures face erosion or marginalization. High-impact citations underscore the need for a multidisciplinary approach to studying the sociocultural effects of globalization, though theoretical contributions remain limited. This paper offers a comprehensive overview and calls for further research and international collaboration to address the challenges of globalization on cultural security.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 102234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176725000975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As globalization advances, both cultural diversity and homogenization spread globally, intensifying local communities’ concerns about cultural security. This study uses bibliometric analysis of 520 articles from the Web of Science Core Collection, combining quantitative and qualitative methods, to explore the relationship between globalization and cultural security. It identifies key issues, examines research trends, and highlights the evolution of the field. Findings show that globalization accelerates cultural exchange through international networks but also exacerbates cultural homogenization, undermining individuals’ sense of security. The spread of foreign cultures threatens indigenous traditions, prompting nationalism and cultural protectionism, and raising awareness of cultural security. Research in this area focuses on three main themes: psychological and social behavioral changes, challenges to cultural identity and heritage preservation, and debates on nationalism. Over time, the focus has shifted from globalization’s risks to cultural identity toward strategies for cultural protection and localized responses, with a growing interest in the polarizing effects of globalization. Cultural security has become a national priority, with emphasis on both cultural preservation and integration. Regionally, cultural security imbalances persist, especially in areas where cultures face erosion or marginalization. High-impact citations underscore the need for a multidisciplinary approach to studying the sociocultural effects of globalization, though theoretical contributions remain limited. This paper offers a comprehensive overview and calls for further research and international collaboration to address the challenges of globalization on cultural security.
全球化背景下的文化安全:文献计量分析与趋势探索
随着全球化进程的推进,文化多样性和同质化在全球蔓延,加剧了当地社区对文化安全的担忧。本研究以Web of Science核心馆藏520篇文献为研究对象,采用定量与定性相结合的方法,探讨全球化与文化安全的关系。它确定了关键问题,检查了研究趋势,并强调了该领域的发展。研究结果表明,全球化通过国际网络加速了文化交流,但也加剧了文化同质化,破坏了个人的安全感。外来文化的传播威胁着本土传统,助长了民族主义和文化保护主义,提高了文化安全意识。这一领域的研究主要集中在三个主题:心理和社会行为的变化,对文化认同和遗产保护的挑战,以及对民族主义的辩论。随着时间的推移,研究的焦点已经从全球化对文化认同的风险转向文化保护和本地化应对策略,对全球化的两极分化效应越来越感兴趣。文化安全已成为国家的优先事项,强调文化保护和文化融合。从区域来看,文化安全失衡仍然存在,特别是在文化受到侵蚀或边缘化的地区。高影响力引用强调需要多学科方法来研究全球化的社会文化影响,尽管理论贡献仍然有限。本文提供了一个全面的概述,并呼吁进一步的研究和国际合作,以应对全球化对文化安全的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信