Comparison of three measurement modalities for 3D characterization of manufactured features and process-induced porosity in titanium alloy additively manufactured parts

Andrew Townsend , Chen Yee , Bryce Jolley , Nikola Draganic , Michael Chapman , Daniel Sparkman , Michael D. Uchic
{"title":"Comparison of three measurement modalities for 3D characterization of manufactured features and process-induced porosity in titanium alloy additively manufactured parts","authors":"Andrew Townsend ,&nbsp;Chen Yee ,&nbsp;Bryce Jolley ,&nbsp;Nikola Draganic ,&nbsp;Michael Chapman ,&nbsp;Daniel Sparkman ,&nbsp;Michael D. Uchic","doi":"10.1016/j.tmater.2025.100070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nondestructive characterization of internal features and defects within complex components is vital for many industrial applications, particularly with the advent of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. However, community understanding of the limitations of nondestructive methods such as X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) can be limited in certain industrial sectors as these may be emergent applications. In this paper, we investigate the limits of X-ray CT measurements and compare extracted data with mechanical polishing serial sectioning (MPSS) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The test object is an additively manufactured titanium alloy disk that contains both process-induced porosity and machined features, including focused ion beam milled features designed to probe the resolution limits of X-ray CT. Results show that each of these characterization techniques has advantages and disadvantages. We compare data acquisition times, spatial resolution, geometric measurement accuracy and defect visualization fidelity across these modalities to establish a practical framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101254,"journal":{"name":"Tomography of Materials and Structures","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100070"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomography of Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949673X25000233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nondestructive characterization of internal features and defects within complex components is vital for many industrial applications, particularly with the advent of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. However, community understanding of the limitations of nondestructive methods such as X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) can be limited in certain industrial sectors as these may be emergent applications. In this paper, we investigate the limits of X-ray CT measurements and compare extracted data with mechanical polishing serial sectioning (MPSS) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The test object is an additively manufactured titanium alloy disk that contains both process-induced porosity and machined features, including focused ion beam milled features designed to probe the resolution limits of X-ray CT. Results show that each of these characterization techniques has advantages and disadvantages. We compare data acquisition times, spatial resolution, geometric measurement accuracy and defect visualization fidelity across these modalities to establish a practical framework.
钛合金增材制造零件制造特征和工艺诱导孔隙度三维表征的三种测量方式的比较
复杂部件内部特征和缺陷的无损表征对于许多工业应用至关重要,特别是随着增材制造(AM)技术的出现。然而,社会对非破坏性方法(如x射线计算机断层扫描(CT))的局限性的理解在某些工业部门可能受到限制,因为这些方法可能是紧急应用。本文研究了x射线CT测量的局限性,并将提取的数据与机械抛光连续切片(MPSS)和共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)进行了比较。测试对象是一个增材制造的钛合金圆盘,包含工艺引起的孔隙和加工特征,包括用于探测x射线CT分辨率极限的聚焦离子束铣削特征。结果表明,每种表征技术都有其优缺点。我们比较了这些模式的数据采集时间、空间分辨率、几何测量精度和缺陷可视化保真度,以建立一个实用的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信