Pilot Study: Development and Evaluation of Validity Evidence of a Low-Cost, Low-Fidelity Hand Model to Teach Clinical Assessment of Small Joint Swelling in Inflammatory Arthritis.

Ibtissam Gad, Christopher Podgorski, Kylie Springer, Amita Bishnoi, Deborah M Rooney, Lisa Zickuhr
{"title":"Pilot Study: Development and Evaluation of Validity Evidence of a Low-Cost, Low-Fidelity Hand Model to Teach Clinical Assessment of Small Joint Swelling in Inflammatory Arthritis.","authors":"Ibtissam Gad, Christopher Podgorski, Kylie Springer, Amita Bishnoi, Deborah M Rooney, Lisa Zickuhr","doi":"10.1097/RHU.0000000000002252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create an affordable, easily reproducible, low-fidelity hand model and present a validity argument for its use to support residents' learning to identify inflammatory arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a hand model to simulate small joint swelling and evaluated evidence to support its use using Messick's Framework between April 2023 and April 2024. Rheumatologists nationwide rated our model (content validity). At 2 tertiary institutions, rheumatologists (experts) and internal medicine residents (learners) evaluated 3 sets of models for small joint swelling, and their scores were compared with Mann-Whitney U test (construct validity). Learners applied their skills to 3 patient encounters, and patient versus model scores were compared with Wilcoxon signed rank test (predictive validity).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One set of 2 hand models cost less than US $5 to create. Thirteen rheumatologists rated our model at 7.23 ± 2.52 out of 10 points; 11 of the 13 (84.6%) rheumatologists thought the model was helpful for training learners to examine swollen joints. Median model evaluation scores for 12 experts (98.9%; range, 92.2%-100%) and 32 learners (100%; range, 84.4%-100%) were not significantly different (p = 0.143). The 18 learners who also evaluated patients had a significantly lower median score when evaluating patients versus the hand models (difference 10.0%; range, 5.6-15.6; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Content validity evidence supported our model's use in internal medicine training; however, the model needs improvement for greater construct and predictive validity. Our easily constructed, low-cost hand model may be a promising introductory training tool for rheumatology medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":520664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000002252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To create an affordable, easily reproducible, low-fidelity hand model and present a validity argument for its use to support residents' learning to identify inflammatory arthritis.

Methods: We designed a hand model to simulate small joint swelling and evaluated evidence to support its use using Messick's Framework between April 2023 and April 2024. Rheumatologists nationwide rated our model (content validity). At 2 tertiary institutions, rheumatologists (experts) and internal medicine residents (learners) evaluated 3 sets of models for small joint swelling, and their scores were compared with Mann-Whitney U test (construct validity). Learners applied their skills to 3 patient encounters, and patient versus model scores were compared with Wilcoxon signed rank test (predictive validity).

Results: One set of 2 hand models cost less than US $5 to create. Thirteen rheumatologists rated our model at 7.23 ± 2.52 out of 10 points; 11 of the 13 (84.6%) rheumatologists thought the model was helpful for training learners to examine swollen joints. Median model evaluation scores for 12 experts (98.9%; range, 92.2%-100%) and 32 learners (100%; range, 84.4%-100%) were not significantly different (p = 0.143). The 18 learners who also evaluated patients had a significantly lower median score when evaluating patients versus the hand models (difference 10.0%; range, 5.6-15.6; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Content validity evidence supported our model's use in internal medicine training; however, the model needs improvement for greater construct and predictive validity. Our easily constructed, low-cost hand model may be a promising introductory training tool for rheumatology medical education.

初步研究:开发和评估低成本、低保真度手模型用于炎性关节炎小关节肿胀临床评估的有效性证据。
目的:建立一个经济实惠、易于复制、低保真度的手部模型,并提出其用于支持居民学习识别炎性关节炎的有效性论证。方法:在2023年4月至2024年4月期间,我们设计了一个模拟小关节肿胀的手部模型,并利用梅西克框架评估证据来支持其使用。全国的风湿病学家对我们的模型进行了评价(内容效度)。在2所高等院校,风湿病学家(专家)和内科住院医师(学习者)对3组小关节肿胀模型进行评估,并采用Mann-Whitney U检验(结构效度)进行比较。学习者将他们的技能应用于3例患者接触,患者和模型得分通过Wilcoxon sign rank检验(预测效度)进行比较。结果:一套2个手模的制作成本不到5美元。13位风湿病学家给我们的模型打了7.23±2.52分(满分10分);13位风湿病学家中有11位(84.6%)认为该模型有助于训练学习者检查肿胀的关节。12位专家的模型评价得分中位数(98.9%;范围:92.2%-100%)和32名学习者(100%;范围为84.4% ~ 100%),差异无统计学意义(p = 0.143)。同时评估患者的18名学习者在评估患者时的中位数得分明显低于手模(差异10.0%;范围5.6 - -15.6;P < 0.001)。结论:内容效度证据支持本模型在内科培训中的应用;然而,该模型需要改进,以提高结构和预测效度。我们易于构建,低成本的手部模型可能是一个有前途的风湿病医学教育的入门培训工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信