Minimally Invasive and Cost-Effective Access to Deep-Seated Intracranial Lesions Using 19F Peel-Away Sheath Introducer and "Dynamic" Retraction: Technical Note and a Case Series.

Elizabeth Siomin, Michael McDermott, Andrea Castaldi, Vitaly Siomin
{"title":"Minimally Invasive and Cost-Effective Access to Deep-Seated Intracranial Lesions Using 19F Peel-Away Sheath Introducer and \"Dynamic\" Retraction: Technical Note and a Case Series.","authors":"Elizabeth Siomin, Michael McDermott, Andrea Castaldi, Vitaly Siomin","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Minimally invasive (MIS) techniques for resection of deep-seated brain lesions (DSL) have become widespread in the past 2 decades. Various devices for endoscopic and open microscopic procedures are now common in many institutions. Most setups use image-guided tubular brain retractors inserted along the paths sparing the eloquent cortical and subcortical structures. The cost of the commercially available retractors may be significant, making them unaffordable in the developing world and even in countries with well-developed economies. The authors introduce a novel, cost-effective technique involving the use of the 19F peel-away sheath introducer and subsequent \"dynamic\" retraction to remove DSL. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new MIS technique in patients with various cerebral pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report on 13 patients who underwent transcortical resection of the DSL. Six patients (46%) had the diagnosis of glioblastoma (2 of which were recurrent). The remaining 7 patients had metastases (3 cases), cavernous malformation (2 cases), thalamic pilocytic astrocytoma, and colloid cyst of the third ventricle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 13 patients underwent aggressive resection of the brain lesions without any complications, except one 37-year old patient with large left basal ganglia glioblastoma experienced worsening of the contralateral hemiparesis and transient expressive aphasia, which improved the baseline over 4 weeks after surgery. Gross total resection was achieved in 11 of the 13 cases after the initial surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The described MIS technique appears safe, technically feasible, and cost-effective alternative to the commonly used tubular retraction systems. The use of \"dynamic\" retraction through narrow surgical tract may become a viable surgical option in patients with deep-seated lesions. It could serve as an affordable alternative to the commercially available systems, particularly in medical centers with limited resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":"29 1","pages":"118-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Minimally invasive (MIS) techniques for resection of deep-seated brain lesions (DSL) have become widespread in the past 2 decades. Various devices for endoscopic and open microscopic procedures are now common in many institutions. Most setups use image-guided tubular brain retractors inserted along the paths sparing the eloquent cortical and subcortical structures. The cost of the commercially available retractors may be significant, making them unaffordable in the developing world and even in countries with well-developed economies. The authors introduce a novel, cost-effective technique involving the use of the 19F peel-away sheath introducer and subsequent "dynamic" retraction to remove DSL. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new MIS technique in patients with various cerebral pathologies.

Methods: We report on 13 patients who underwent transcortical resection of the DSL. Six patients (46%) had the diagnosis of glioblastoma (2 of which were recurrent). The remaining 7 patients had metastases (3 cases), cavernous malformation (2 cases), thalamic pilocytic astrocytoma, and colloid cyst of the third ventricle.

Results: All 13 patients underwent aggressive resection of the brain lesions without any complications, except one 37-year old patient with large left basal ganglia glioblastoma experienced worsening of the contralateral hemiparesis and transient expressive aphasia, which improved the baseline over 4 weeks after surgery. Gross total resection was achieved in 11 of the 13 cases after the initial surgery.

Conclusion: The described MIS technique appears safe, technically feasible, and cost-effective alternative to the commonly used tubular retraction systems. The use of "dynamic" retraction through narrow surgical tract may become a viable surgical option in patients with deep-seated lesions. It could serve as an affordable alternative to the commercially available systems, particularly in medical centers with limited resources.

使用19F剥去鞘引入器和“动态”回拉器,微创和经济有效地进入深部颅内病变:技术说明和病例系列。
背景和目的:在过去的20年里,微创(MIS)技术在深部脑病变(DSL)切除术中的应用越来越广泛。内窥镜和开放显微手术的各种设备现在在许多机构中很常见。大多数设置使用图像引导的管状脑牵开器沿着路径插入,保留了重要的皮层和皮层下结构。商用牵引器的成本可能很高,使发展中国家甚至经济发达的国家都负担不起。作者介绍了一种新颖、经济的技术,包括使用19F剥离鞘引入器和随后的“动态”回缩来去除DSL。本研究的目的是评估一种新的MIS技术在不同脑病理患者中的可行性和安全性。方法:我们报告了13例经皮质切除DSL的患者。6例(46%)被诊断为胶质母细胞瘤(2例复发)。其余7例有转移瘤(3例)、海绵状血管瘤(2例)、丘脑毛细胞星形细胞瘤、第三脑室胶质囊肿。结果:13例患者均行脑病变积极切除,除1例37岁左侧基底节区大胶质母细胞瘤患者对侧偏瘫和一过性表达性失语加重外,无并发症,术后4周基线改善。初次手术后,13例患者中有11例实现了大体全切除。结论:所描述的MIS技术是安全的,技术上可行的,并且具有成本效益的替代常用的管状内收系统。在深部病变患者中,通过狭窄手术道的“动态”内收可能成为一种可行的手术选择。它可以作为一种可负担得起的商用系统替代品,特别是在资源有限的医疗中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信