"Open Notes" in Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology: Caregiver and Provider Experiences in a Single Center.

Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-05-14 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpedcp.2025.200147
Megan Rodts, Dana B Gal, Brittney K Hills, Elisa Marcuccio, Colleen M Pater, Samuel Hanke
{"title":"\"Open Notes\" in Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology: Caregiver and Provider Experiences in a Single Center.","authors":"Megan Rodts, Dana B Gal, Brittney K Hills, Elisa Marcuccio, Colleen M Pater, Samuel Hanke","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedcp.2025.200147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the utilization of shared medical notes, referred to as \"open notes,\" and the experience of caregivers and cardiology providers during inpatient hospitalization for congenital heart disease.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Single-center, cross-sectional, survey-based study utilizing convenience sampling of patient caregivers on a pediatric acute care cardiology unit and corresponding cardiology providers. Surveys assessed demographic information, health literacy of caregivers, and experiences during inpatient hospitalization that relate to open note use. Descriptive statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five caregivers (47% of eligible) and 21 cardiology providers (100% of eligible) were enrolled. There were no demographic differences between caregivers, or their children, who were open notes vs nonopen notes users (<i>P</i> > .05). Most caregivers were aware that the notes were available (87%), yet fewer enrolled in the program to read them (71%). Most caregivers had positive experiences with the notes (85%), while cardiology providers' opinions were overall neutral or negative (65%). Cardiology providers' suggestions for improvement of open notes were frequently infeasible based on regulations required by the 21st Century Cures Act.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Open notes in inpatient subspecialty pediatrics yields a novel opportunity for caregivers to engage positively and actively with the care team. Cardiology providers may value how positively caregivers view open notes as a method of receiving medical information and interacting with the care team. Cardiology providers may also benefit from further education on the new legislation in the 21st Century Cures Act.</p>","PeriodicalId":519930,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"200147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedcp.2025.200147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify the utilization of shared medical notes, referred to as "open notes," and the experience of caregivers and cardiology providers during inpatient hospitalization for congenital heart disease.

Study design: Single-center, cross-sectional, survey-based study utilizing convenience sampling of patient caregivers on a pediatric acute care cardiology unit and corresponding cardiology providers. Surveys assessed demographic information, health literacy of caregivers, and experiences during inpatient hospitalization that relate to open note use. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results: Forty-five caregivers (47% of eligible) and 21 cardiology providers (100% of eligible) were enrolled. There were no demographic differences between caregivers, or their children, who were open notes vs nonopen notes users (P > .05). Most caregivers were aware that the notes were available (87%), yet fewer enrolled in the program to read them (71%). Most caregivers had positive experiences with the notes (85%), while cardiology providers' opinions were overall neutral or negative (65%). Cardiology providers' suggestions for improvement of open notes were frequently infeasible based on regulations required by the 21st Century Cures Act.

Conclusions: Open notes in inpatient subspecialty pediatrics yields a novel opportunity for caregivers to engage positively and actively with the care team. Cardiology providers may value how positively caregivers view open notes as a method of receiving medical information and interacting with the care team. Cardiology providers may also benefit from further education on the new legislation in the 21st Century Cures Act.

儿科急症护理心脏病学的“开放笔记”:护理人员和提供者在单一中心的经验。
目的:确定共享医疗记录(称为“开放记录”)的使用情况,以及护理人员和心脏病学提供者在先天性心脏病住院期间的经验。研究设计:单中心,横断面,基于调查的研究,利用方便抽样的病人护理人员在儿科急症护理心脏病科和相应的心脏病学提供者。调查评估了人口统计信息、护理人员的健康素养以及住院期间与打开病历使用相关的经验。进行描述性统计。结果:45名护理人员(47%符合条件)和21名心脏病学提供者(100%符合条件)入组。在使用开放笔记和不使用开放笔记的照顾者或他们的孩子之间没有人口统计学差异(P < 0.05)。大多数护理人员都知道这些笔记是可用的(87%),但报名阅读这些笔记的人数较少(71%)。大多数护理人员对这些笔记有积极的体验(85%),而心脏病学提供者的意见总体上是中性或消极的(65%)。根据《21世纪治愈法案》(21st Century Cures Act)的规定,心脏病学提供者提出的改善开放式笔记的建议往往是不可行的。结论:儿科亚专科住院病人的开放记录为护理人员提供了一个积极参与护理团队的新机会。心脏病学提供者可能会重视护理人员如何积极地将公开笔记视为接收医疗信息和与护理团队互动的一种方法。心脏病学提供者也可以从《21世纪治愈法案》的新立法的进一步教育中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信