Effectiveness of mucoactives (carbocisteine and hypertonic saline) in addition to usual airway clearance management with usual airway clearance management alone in acute respiratory failure (MARCH): study protocol for a multi-centre 2x2 factorial, randomised, controlled, open-label, Phase 3, pragmatic, clinical and cost-effectiveness trial with internal pilot.

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2025-04-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13905.1
Bronwen Connolly, Naomi Dickson, Ashley Agus, Bronagh Blackwood, Mark Borthwick, Judy Bradley, Christina Campbell, Marc Chikhani, Mike Clarke, Paul Dark, Ranjit Lall, Cliona McDowell, Margaret McFarland, Michael McKelvey, Cecilia O'Kane, Brenda O'Neill, Gavin Perkins, Murali Shyamsundar, Gordon Sturmey, Clifford C Taggart, John Warburton, Barry Williams, Daniel F McAuley
{"title":"Effectiveness of mucoactives (carbocisteine and hypertonic saline) in addition to usual airway clearance management with usual airway clearance management alone in acute respiratory failure (MARCH): study protocol for a multi-centre 2x2 factorial, randomised, controlled, open-label, Phase 3, pragmatic, clinical and cost-effectiveness trial with internal pilot.","authors":"Bronwen Connolly, Naomi Dickson, Ashley Agus, Bronagh Blackwood, Mark Borthwick, Judy Bradley, Christina Campbell, Marc Chikhani, Mike Clarke, Paul Dark, Ranjit Lall, Cliona McDowell, Margaret McFarland, Michael McKelvey, Cecilia O'Kane, Brenda O'Neill, Gavin Perkins, Murali Shyamsundar, Gordon Sturmey, Clifford C Taggart, John Warburton, Barry Williams, Daniel F McAuley","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13905.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Usual airway clearance management in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure includes suctioning, humidification, use of isotonic saline, and respiratory physiotherapy techniques. Escalation to use of mucoactives occurs when secretions are difficult to clear. Use of mucoactives in clinical practice for this patient population is extensive, yet empirical and variable. Carbocisteine and hypertonic saline are the most used agents, but evidence for their effectiveness is absent or minimal. The lack of existing large-scale randomised trials comparing mucoactives to usual airway clearance management alone in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure highlights the urgency and necessity of this study.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether the use of mucoactives in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure improves clinical outcomes and is cost effective, compared to usual airway clearance management alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A UK multi-centre, 2x2 factorial, randomised, controlled, open-label, Phase 3, pragmatic, clinical and cost effectiveness trial with internal pilot. The target sample is 1956 critically ill adults. Participants will be equally allocated across four trial arms. All participants will receive usual airway clearance management. In three intervention groups, participants will receive either carbocisteine, hypertonic saline, or a combination of carbocisteine and hypertonic saline. In the fourth comparator group, participants will receive usual airway clearance management alone. The primary outcome is the duration of mechanical ventilation with secondary clinical, safety, and health resource utilisation outcomes. The trial will be reported in accordance with CONSORT guidelines. Ethical approval was granted by Leeds East (Yorkshire & The Humber) Research Ethics Committee (reference 21/YH/0234) on 28 <sup>th</sup> October 2021. All participants will provide written, informed consent via either Personal or Professional Legal Representatives, and subsequently directly once capacity is regained.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Main trial: ISRCTN17683568, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17683568, 25 <sup>th</sup> November 2021Study Within A Trial: ISRCTN16675252, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16675252, 3 <sup>rd</sup> November 2021EudraCT Number, 2021-003763-94.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"5 ","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13905.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Usual airway clearance management in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure includes suctioning, humidification, use of isotonic saline, and respiratory physiotherapy techniques. Escalation to use of mucoactives occurs when secretions are difficult to clear. Use of mucoactives in clinical practice for this patient population is extensive, yet empirical and variable. Carbocisteine and hypertonic saline are the most used agents, but evidence for their effectiveness is absent or minimal. The lack of existing large-scale randomised trials comparing mucoactives to usual airway clearance management alone in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure highlights the urgency and necessity of this study.

Aim: To determine whether the use of mucoactives in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure improves clinical outcomes and is cost effective, compared to usual airway clearance management alone.

Methods: A UK multi-centre, 2x2 factorial, randomised, controlled, open-label, Phase 3, pragmatic, clinical and cost effectiveness trial with internal pilot. The target sample is 1956 critically ill adults. Participants will be equally allocated across four trial arms. All participants will receive usual airway clearance management. In three intervention groups, participants will receive either carbocisteine, hypertonic saline, or a combination of carbocisteine and hypertonic saline. In the fourth comparator group, participants will receive usual airway clearance management alone. The primary outcome is the duration of mechanical ventilation with secondary clinical, safety, and health resource utilisation outcomes. The trial will be reported in accordance with CONSORT guidelines. Ethical approval was granted by Leeds East (Yorkshire & The Humber) Research Ethics Committee (reference 21/YH/0234) on 28 th October 2021. All participants will provide written, informed consent via either Personal or Professional Legal Representatives, and subsequently directly once capacity is regained.

Trial registration: Main trial: ISRCTN17683568, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17683568, 25 th November 2021Study Within A Trial: ISRCTN16675252, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16675252, 3 rd November 2021EudraCT Number, 2021-003763-94.

在急性呼吸衰竭(MARCH)中,除常规气道清除管理外,使用黏液活性药物(卡西汀和高渗盐水)的有效性:一项多中心2x2因子、随机、对照、开放标签、3期、实用、临床和成本效益的内部试点试验的研究方案。
背景:急性呼吸衰竭危重患者的常规气道清除管理包括吸痰、湿化、使用等渗生理盐水和呼吸物理治疗技术。当分泌物难以清除时,会升级到使用黏液活性物质。在临床实践中使用黏液活性物质的患者群体是广泛的,但经验和变量。卡西汀和高渗盐水是最常用的药物,但其有效性的证据缺失或很少。目前还没有大规模的随机试验来比较在重症急性呼吸衰竭患者中使用黏液活性药物和单独使用常规气道清除率,这凸显了本研究的紧迫性和必要性。目的:确定与单独使用常规气道清除率管理相比,在急性呼吸衰竭危重患者中使用粘活性药物是否能改善临床结果并具有成本效益。方法:一项英国多中心、2x2因子、随机、对照、开放标签、3期、实用、临床和成本效益的内部试点试验。目标样本是1956名危重成人。参与者将被平均分配到四个试验组。所有参与者将接受常规的气道清理管理。在三个干预组中,参与者将接受卡西汀,高渗盐水,或卡西汀和高渗盐水的组合。在第四个比较组中,参与者将单独接受常规的气道清除管理。主要结局是机械通气的持续时间,其次是临床、安全和卫生资源利用结局。试验将按照CONSORT指南进行报告。利兹东(约克郡和亨伯)研究伦理委员会(参考文献21/YH/0234)于2021年10月28日批准了伦理批准。所有参与者将通过个人或专业法律代表提供书面知情同意书,并在恢复行为能力后直接提供。试验注册:主要试验:ISRCTN17683568, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17683568, 2021年11月25日;试验内研究:ISRCTN16675252, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN16675252, 2021年11月3日;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信