Feasibility of Ultralow-Dose CT With Deep-Learning Reconstruction for Aneurysm Diameter Measurement in Post-EVAR Follow-Up: A Prospective Comparative Study With Conventional CT.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Keigo Matsushiro, Takuya Okada, Koji Sasaki, Tomoyuki Gentsu, Eisuke Ueshima, Keitaro Sofue, Katsuhiro Yamanaka, Masatoshi Hori, Masato Yamaguchi, Koji Sugimoto, Kenji Okada, Takamichi Murakami
{"title":"Feasibility of Ultralow-Dose CT With Deep-Learning Reconstruction for Aneurysm Diameter Measurement in Post-EVAR Follow-Up: A Prospective Comparative Study With Conventional CT.","authors":"Keigo Matsushiro, Takuya Okada, Koji Sasaki, Tomoyuki Gentsu, Eisuke Ueshima, Keitaro Sofue, Katsuhiro Yamanaka, Masatoshi Hori, Masato Yamaguchi, Koji Sugimoto, Kenji Okada, Takamichi Murakami","doi":"10.1177/15266028251339345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the usefulness of ultralow-dose computed tomography (ULD-CT) with deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) compared with conventional standard-dose CT (SD-CT) for post-endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) surveillance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We prospectively performed post-EVAR surveillance using ULD-CT at a single center in 44 patients after they had received SD-CT. The ULD-CT images underwent DLR, whereas the SD-CT images underwent iterative reconstruction. Three radiologists blinded to the patient information and CT conditions independently measured the aneurysmal sac diameter and evaluated the overall image quality. Bland-Altman analysis and a linear mixed-effects model were used to assess and compare the measurement accuracy between SD-CT and ULD-CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean CT dose index volume and dose-length product were significantly lower for ULD-CT (1.0 ± 0.3 mGy and 71.4 ± 26.5 mGy•cm) than that for SD-CT (6.9 ± 0.9 mGy and 500.9 ± 96.0 mGy•cm; p<0.001). The mean short diameters of the aneurysmal sac measured by the 3 observers were 46.7 ± 10.8 mm on SD-CT and 46.3 ± 10.8 mm on ULD-CT. The mean difference in the short diameter of the aneurysmal sac between ULD-CT and SD-CT was -0.37 mm (95% confidence interval, -0.6 to -0.12 mm). The intraobserver limits of agreement (LOA) for measurements by ULD-CT and SD-CT were -3.5 to 2.6, -2.8 to 1.9, and -2.9 to 2.3 for Observers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The pairwise LOAs for assessing interobserver agreement, such as for the differences between Observers 1 and 2 measurements in SD-CT, were mostly within the predetermined acceptable range. The mean image-quality score was lower for ULD-CT (3.3 ± 0.6) than that for SD-CT (4.5 ± 0.5; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aneurysmal sac diameter measurements by ULD-CT with DLR were sufficiently accurate for post-EVAR surveillance, with substantial radiation reduction versus SD-CT.Clinical ImpactDeep-learning reconstruction (DLR) is implemented as a software-based algorithm rather than requiring dedicated hardware. As such, it is expected to be integrated into standard computed tomography (CT) systems in the near future. The ultralow-dose CT (ULD-CT) with DLR evaluated in this study has the potential to become widely accessible across various institutions. This advancement could substantially reduce radiation exposure in post-endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) CT imaging, thereby facilitating its adoption as a standard modality for post-EVAR surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251339345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251339345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the usefulness of ultralow-dose computed tomography (ULD-CT) with deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) compared with conventional standard-dose CT (SD-CT) for post-endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) surveillance.

Materials and methods: We prospectively performed post-EVAR surveillance using ULD-CT at a single center in 44 patients after they had received SD-CT. The ULD-CT images underwent DLR, whereas the SD-CT images underwent iterative reconstruction. Three radiologists blinded to the patient information and CT conditions independently measured the aneurysmal sac diameter and evaluated the overall image quality. Bland-Altman analysis and a linear mixed-effects model were used to assess and compare the measurement accuracy between SD-CT and ULD-CT.

Results: The mean CT dose index volume and dose-length product were significantly lower for ULD-CT (1.0 ± 0.3 mGy and 71.4 ± 26.5 mGy•cm) than that for SD-CT (6.9 ± 0.9 mGy and 500.9 ± 96.0 mGy•cm; p<0.001). The mean short diameters of the aneurysmal sac measured by the 3 observers were 46.7 ± 10.8 mm on SD-CT and 46.3 ± 10.8 mm on ULD-CT. The mean difference in the short diameter of the aneurysmal sac between ULD-CT and SD-CT was -0.37 mm (95% confidence interval, -0.6 to -0.12 mm). The intraobserver limits of agreement (LOA) for measurements by ULD-CT and SD-CT were -3.5 to 2.6, -2.8 to 1.9, and -2.9 to 2.3 for Observers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The pairwise LOAs for assessing interobserver agreement, such as for the differences between Observers 1 and 2 measurements in SD-CT, were mostly within the predetermined acceptable range. The mean image-quality score was lower for ULD-CT (3.3 ± 0.6) than that for SD-CT (4.5 ± 0.5; p<0.001).

Conclusion: Aneurysmal sac diameter measurements by ULD-CT with DLR were sufficiently accurate for post-EVAR surveillance, with substantial radiation reduction versus SD-CT.Clinical ImpactDeep-learning reconstruction (DLR) is implemented as a software-based algorithm rather than requiring dedicated hardware. As such, it is expected to be integrated into standard computed tomography (CT) systems in the near future. The ultralow-dose CT (ULD-CT) with DLR evaluated in this study has the potential to become widely accessible across various institutions. This advancement could substantially reduce radiation exposure in post-endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) CT imaging, thereby facilitating its adoption as a standard modality for post-EVAR surveillance.

超低剂量CT深度学习重建在evar后随访中测量动脉瘤直径的可行性:与常规CT的前瞻性比较研究。
目的:我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,以评估超低剂量计算机断层扫描(ld -CT)深度学习重建(DLR)与传统标准剂量CT (SD-CT)在血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)后监测中的实用性。材料和方法:我们前瞻性地对44例接受SD-CT治疗的患者在单中心使用ld - ct进行evar后监测。ld - ct图像进行DLR, SD-CT图像进行迭代重建。三位不知道患者信息和CT条件的放射科医生独立测量了动脉瘤囊直径并评估了整体图像质量。采用Bland-Altman分析和线性混合效应模型评估和比较SD-CT和ld - ct的测量精度。结果:ld -CT的CT平均剂量指数(1.0±0.3 mGy)、体积(71.4±26.5 mGy•cm)明显低于SD-CT(6.9±0.9 mGy、500.9±96.0 mGy•cm);结论:与SD-CT相比,使用ld - ct结合DLR测量动脉瘤囊直径对evar后的监测足够准确,辐射明显降低。临床影响深度学习重建(DLR)是一种基于软件的算法,而不需要专用的硬件。因此,它有望在不久的将来集成到标准的计算机断层扫描(CT)系统中。本研究评估的具有DLR的超低剂量CT (ld -CT)具有在各机构广泛使用的潜力。这一进展可以大大减少血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)后CT成像中的辐射暴露,从而促进其成为EVAR后监测的标准模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信